Dark Helmet Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 But DH, even you said the team shouldn't have won 93 games last season - so you know they need to improve the roster. I do know, thats why what the team did in 2012 is so great. And the players deserve to be treated that way. Nit like a bunch of flukes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrungoHazewood Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 Im not talking about what happens in 2013. 2012 is being thrown out, like it never happened, because stats show it never should have. Thats showing the players no respect. Should Buck have told his guys to stop playing hard, once they got to the 80-82 wins, that stats said they shouldve won? The respect should be shown for the effort, to get to the 93 wins. Yet, they wont get any, because it was luck. I really, truly have no idea what you're talking about. You can respect the effort and the accomplishments of the 2012 Orioles, then move on and realize there's much work to be done for '13. That's what we're doing here: Great job guys, awesome season, now let's get back to work and figure out how to not have this be a one-off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Helmet Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 The way I read it was the O's shouldn't approach '13 thinking they just need a minor tweak or two to keep rolling at 90+ wins. And I agree with that. I guess it just bothers me, that we finally had a season to be proud of, but a lot of experts want to just write it off, like it never happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrungoHazewood Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 I do know, thats why what the team did in 2012 is so great. And the players deserve to be treated that way. Nit like a bunch of flukes. What does that respect look like? To me it seems you're saying predictions for '13 need to be modified to account for the awesomeness that was '12. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Helmet Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 I really, truly have no idea what you're talking about. You can respect the effort and the accomplishments of the 2012 Orioles, then move on and realize there's much work to be done for '13. That's what we're doing here: Great job guys, awesome season, now let's get back to work and figure out how to not have this be a one-off. I agree. But the Orioles arent even getting that. Oh well, i give in. It was a fluke. I dont see a lot of areas DD will upgrade. He basically said, claiming Casilla, took them out of the 2b market. McLouth will likely be back in LF. The rotation is almost set, and so is the bp. If the expected regression happens, we'll be lucky to win 75 games. Then 2012 can be officially written off as a fluke, and i.stead of saying we had 16 straight lising seasons, they'll jyst say "15 out of the last 16". Thats sounds much better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Helmet Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 What does that respect look like? To me it seems you're saying predictions for '13 need to be modified to account for the awesomeness that was '12. No, im saying give them the respect for what they did in 2012. 2013 has nothing to do with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Helmet Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 What does that respect look like? To me it seems you're saying predictions for '13 need to be modified to account for the awesomeness that was '12. Well, the folks that know more than I, predicted a bad 2012, because of 2011 suckiness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrungoHazewood Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 No, im saying give them the respect for what they did in 2012. 2013 has nothing to do with that. Ok. How is nobody respecting what they did? Do the "experts" need to explicitly state that the 93 wins in '12 were all because of hard work and guts and moxie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
primetime Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 Here's what I don't get....Sheehan writes that we were essentially a .500 team that got lucky and our focus shouldn't be aon next year but rather 2014 and beyond. Yet in the same space, he proposes going after expensive players in mid 30's...doesn't that seem a bit counterintuitive? Particularly with relation to the theory that he wrote? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Helmet Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 Ok. How is nobody respecting what they did? Do the "experts" need to explicitly state that the 93 wins in '12 were all because of hard work and guts and moxie? I don't expect experts to do that. But, to just chalk it up to luck, is just easier I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Number5 Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 Here's what I don't get....Sheehan writes that we were essentially a .500 team that got lucky and our focus shouldn't be aon next year but rather 2014 and beyond. Yet in the same space, he proposes going after expensive players in mid 30's...doesn't that seem a bit counterintuitive? Particularly with relation to the theory that he wrote? Great point. I agree with you. Sheehan's "solution" of re-signing Thome and going after Swisher, Youkilis, and Scutaro, while starting Machado in AAA, seems diametrically opposed to his statement of where the Orioles' "focus" should be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrungoHazewood Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 I don't expect experts to do that. But, to just chalk it up to luck, is just easier I guess. Easier, and at least as accurate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dark Helmet Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 Easier, and at least as accurate. Well, I guess Buck doesn't deserve to even be in the conversation, for manager of the year. Since obviously, all he did was sprinkle the players with magic fairy dust, before each game...well, before 93 of them atleast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaulFolk Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 OK Dark Helmet, fess up. Are you being paid by the comma? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roll Tide Posted November 7, 2012 Share Posted November 7, 2012 Well, I guess Buck doesn't deserve to even be in the conversation, for manager of the year. Since obviously, all he did was sprinkle the players with magic fairy dust, before each game...well, before 93 of them atleast. What happened in 2011 ? Did he misplace the fairy dust ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.