Jump to content

Lohse signs with Brewers


weams

Recommended Posts

So the Os move up one spot in the draft because the Brewers forfeit their pick.

It will be interesting to see if/when Milwaukee does not compete if they are able to trade Lohse for more than the equivalent of a mid-first round pick. I expect that will be the case unless Lohse falls off a cliff production-wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just hope this isn't going to be spun as some huge Boras victory. He was publicly asking for 3/45 and ended up on a non-frontrunner in a smaller market for 3/33.

Lohse ended up doing OK but this isn't a big win.

I agree about not wanting Boras to get anymore props...but really it was the draft pick that cost the dollars in this case, don't you think? I am actually surprised he even got multiple years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree about not wanting Boras to get anymore props...but really it was the draft pick that cost the dollars in this case, don't you think? I am actually surprised he even got multiple years.

I think his contract demands, his age, and his peripherals were more of an issue then the draft pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think his contract demands, his age, and his peripherals were more of an issue then the draft pick.

Probably a large part of it, but we have seen plenty of players with poor contract demands, age issues and poor peripherals....who have also signed contracts for more than that players actual value (especially Boras players).....well before the end of spring training. This is just the first year I have seen someone with numbers like Lohse go unsigned for this long....that I can remember.

Regardless, I still feel Lohse got screwed here somehow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably a large part of it, but we have seen plenty of players with poor contract demands, age issues and poor peripherals....who have also signed contracts for more than that players actual value (especially Boras players).....well before the end of spring training. This is just the first year I have seen someone with numbers like Lohse go unsigned for this long....that I can remember.

Regardless, I still feel Lohse got screwed here somehow.

I saw some numbers a few days ago showing that he wasn't been worth 3/45 at any point in his career. I find it hard to believe he will start now. I expect his numbers to drop off, pretty significantly by year three.

I think he might have gotten 3/33 earlier then he did without having the pick attached to him but I don't think 3/45 was going to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree about not wanting Boras to get anymore props...but really it was the draft pick that cost the dollars in this case, don't you think? I am actually surprised he even got multiple years.

No, because a good agent would have had him take the qualifying offer. And then when the Cardinals traded him, hold the new team up for ransom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think his contract demands, his age, and his peripherals were more of an issue then the draft pick.

I absolutely agree. Also that fact that he was a fluke last season. This would be a good template for a Hammel deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw some numbers a few days ago showing that he wasn't been worth 3/45 at any point in his career. I find it hard to believe he will start now. I expect his numbers to drop off, pretty significantly by year three.

I think he might have gotten 3/33 earlier then he did without having the pick attached to him but I don't think 3/45 was going to happen.

I do understand and even with his age, I feel if the Yankee's or Redsox of past or the Dodger's of now were severely pitching strapped, I think Lohse with his past two solid years would have gone for more years and more money....worth it or not. So, yes, not just the pick, but I still feel Lohse did not get what he would have gotten in a "normal" market place.

I cannot remember a close to prime pitcher with his consistent solid numbers signing until almost April in the past.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I absolutely agree. Also that fact that he was a fluke last season. This would be a good template for a Hammel deal.

But, it has been two years, two years sub 3.5 ERA and 1.2 WHIP. I am no sabermetrician, but were his peripherals that bad?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But, it has been two years, two years sub 3.5 ERA and 1.2 WHIP. I am no sabermetrician, but were his peripherals that bad?

He was pretty good last year but in 2011 he had an ERA+ of 109 which while above average is nothing special. He also had a K rate of 5.3. In 2012, at the age of 33 he lowered his hit and walk rate and increased his K rate. I can see why teams would be skeptical of that trend continuing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was pretty good last year but in 2011 he had an ERA+ of 109 which while above average is nothing special. He also had a K rate of 5.3. In 2012, at the age of 33 he lowered his hit and walk rate and increased his K rate. I can see why teams would be skeptical of that trend continuing.

I see that and I agree that is wise and sound thinking, just not used to it from MLB GM's with open pocketbooks. Just wasn't his year I guess....just feel sort of bad for him, if you can feel bad for a multi-millioniare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Orioles News and Information

Daily Organizational Boxscores

News

Orioles Roster Resource

Orioles Prospect Information

2022 Top 75 Prospects

Statistics

2022 Orioles Stats

2022 Orioles Minor League Stats

Baseball Savant Stats



  • Posts

    • I've been to 3 games this year.  I live inside the DC Beltway and quite a few of my son's friends and their families have gone as well.  That's definitely a first - can't ever remember family friends down here making treks up to Camden since the Nats started to play well ~2012.  
    • First off he doesn't know.  It might look like two weeks now and he has a setback. Also, seven weeks counts as weeks not months.  😉 I'm guessing the ASB.
    • Elias did say "weeks, not months" to Brian Kenny on MLB Network a few days back on a direct question about length of absence.     But it still may have been a bull sling. I'm hoping Adam Frazier's veteranosity has been duly honored by a couple games and we get leadoff Gunnar, at least against RHP.    I'm not very confident in anyone, but I have some hope Gunnar could actually do something against Logan Webb.
    • Reading the tea leaves, I don't think he likes Haskin or Pinto much either.  Rom got moved to Bowie after 67 strong innings in Aberdeen at age 21. Pinto is still in Aberdeen at age 22 after 134 strong innings. IIRC, Haskin didn't receive a ML ST invite despite a good statline last year at Bowie. Haskin and Handley need to get healthy and rake to get added. Pinto needs 50+ IP with a sub 4 FIP at Bowie to get added.
    • Yep, the Giants were 11-17 on May 1, since then they have reversed that and gone 17-11.   And as noted, we get their top 3 starters.  So although we are playing a .500 team, they have been playing like a .600 team for a month, and we are getting their best pitchers. On the bright side, they are 18-22 vs RH starters, and 10-6 vs LH starters, and they'll get nothin' but righties from us.
    • How does other people having good seasons excuse the poor call they’re making on keeping Mateo and Mountcastle in the lineup every day?
    • OMG if looks could kill.  Talk about adding insult to injury....."Grayson, you're demoted"......"Grayson, hold this please" In all seriousness it will be interested to see how he handles next few starts.  I hope he pitches like a man on a mission and realizes what gave him success at AAA isn't going to cut it in MLB and he starts to refine his game even more.  Biggest tests come after the player has been knocked on his back side and to see how he gets back up. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...