Jump to content

Lohse signs with Brewers


weams

Recommended Posts

So the Os move up one spot in the draft because the Brewers forfeit their pick.

It will be interesting to see if/when Milwaukee does not compete if they are able to trade Lohse for more than the equivalent of a mid-first round pick. I expect that will be the case unless Lohse falls off a cliff production-wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just hope this isn't going to be spun as some huge Boras victory. He was publicly asking for 3/45 and ended up on a non-frontrunner in a smaller market for 3/33.

Lohse ended up doing OK but this isn't a big win.

I agree about not wanting Boras to get anymore props...but really it was the draft pick that cost the dollars in this case, don't you think? I am actually surprised he even got multiple years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree about not wanting Boras to get anymore props...but really it was the draft pick that cost the dollars in this case, don't you think? I am actually surprised he even got multiple years.

I think his contract demands, his age, and his peripherals were more of an issue then the draft pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think his contract demands, his age, and his peripherals were more of an issue then the draft pick.

Probably a large part of it, but we have seen plenty of players with poor contract demands, age issues and poor peripherals....who have also signed contracts for more than that players actual value (especially Boras players).....well before the end of spring training. This is just the first year I have seen someone with numbers like Lohse go unsigned for this long....that I can remember.

Regardless, I still feel Lohse got screwed here somehow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Probably a large part of it, but we have seen plenty of players with poor contract demands, age issues and poor peripherals....who have also signed contracts for more than that players actual value (especially Boras players).....well before the end of spring training. This is just the first year I have seen someone with numbers like Lohse go unsigned for this long....that I can remember.

Regardless, I still feel Lohse got screwed here somehow.

I saw some numbers a few days ago showing that he wasn't been worth 3/45 at any point in his career. I find it hard to believe he will start now. I expect his numbers to drop off, pretty significantly by year three.

I think he might have gotten 3/33 earlier then he did without having the pick attached to him but I don't think 3/45 was going to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree about not wanting Boras to get anymore props...but really it was the draft pick that cost the dollars in this case, don't you think? I am actually surprised he even got multiple years.

No, because a good agent would have had him take the qualifying offer. And then when the Cardinals traded him, hold the new team up for ransom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think his contract demands, his age, and his peripherals were more of an issue then the draft pick.

I absolutely agree. Also that fact that he was a fluke last season. This would be a good template for a Hammel deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw some numbers a few days ago showing that he wasn't been worth 3/45 at any point in his career. I find it hard to believe he will start now. I expect his numbers to drop off, pretty significantly by year three.

I think he might have gotten 3/33 earlier then he did without having the pick attached to him but I don't think 3/45 was going to happen.

I do understand and even with his age, I feel if the Yankee's or Redsox of past or the Dodger's of now were severely pitching strapped, I think Lohse with his past two solid years would have gone for more years and more money....worth it or not. So, yes, not just the pick, but I still feel Lohse did not get what he would have gotten in a "normal" market place.

I cannot remember a close to prime pitcher with his consistent solid numbers signing until almost April in the past.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I absolutely agree. Also that fact that he was a fluke last season. This would be a good template for a Hammel deal.

But, it has been two years, two years sub 3.5 ERA and 1.2 WHIP. I am no sabermetrician, but were his peripherals that bad?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But, it has been two years, two years sub 3.5 ERA and 1.2 WHIP. I am no sabermetrician, but were his peripherals that bad?

He was pretty good last year but in 2011 he had an ERA+ of 109 which while above average is nothing special. He also had a K rate of 5.3. In 2012, at the age of 33 he lowered his hit and walk rate and increased his K rate. I can see why teams would be skeptical of that trend continuing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was pretty good last year but in 2011 he had an ERA+ of 109 which while above average is nothing special. He also had a K rate of 5.3. In 2012, at the age of 33 he lowered his hit and walk rate and increased his K rate. I can see why teams would be skeptical of that trend continuing.

I see that and I agree that is wise and sound thinking, just not used to it from MLB GM's with open pocketbooks. Just wasn't his year I guess....just feel sort of bad for him, if you can feel bad for a multi-millioniare.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...