Jump to content

Lohse signs with Brewers


weams

Recommended Posts

No, because a good agent would have had him take the qualifying offer. And then when the Cardinals traded him, hold the new team up for ransom.

Why? Could a 35 year-old Lohse expect more than 2/$20 even with a decent year? No way should he have taken the qualifying offer, get the most money you can when you can get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why? Could a 35 year-old Lohse expect more than 2/$20 even with a decent year? No way should he have taken the qualifying offer, get the most money you can when you can get it.

The Milwaukee deal is $20M better than the qualifying offer. Lohse was right to take it. The only question is whether he should have held out until June 1st in hopes of getting a much better deal from a team desperate for starting pitching. I would say not.

Bernie Miklacz examines the Post-Cardinal Pitching Syndrome in today's St. Louis Post Dispatch.

Here?s a list of guys who left the Cardinals after making at least 15 starts here, with the Before and After ERAs.

Matt Morris: 3.61 ERA as a Cardinal; 5.19 post-Cardinals.

Andy Benes: 4.07 ERA as a Cardinal over two stints; 4.36 ERA during a two-year run with Arizona.

Jason Marquis: About the same, with a 4.60 ERA as a Cardinal and a 4.65 ERA post-Cardinal.

Woody Williams: 3.53 ERA as a Cardinal but a 4.66 post-Cardinal.

Jeff Suppan: 3.94 ERA as a Cardinal; 5.08 ERA in three-plus seasons in Milwaukee after signing as a free agent.

Todd Stottlemyre: 3.77 ERA as a Cardinal, 4.67 post-Cardinal.

Joel Pineiro: 4.14 ERA as a Cardinal; 4.47 after.

Jeff Weaver: he didn?t have much of a regular-season ERA for the Cardinals, but was a star of the 2006 postseason, winning a game in each round including the World Series clincher over Detroit. After that: 5.43 ERA.

Braden Looper: 4.50 ERA as a Cardinal starter; 5.22 after leaving.

Kent Bottenfield: 4.01 ERA as a Cardinal; 5.63 post-Cardinal.

Darren Oliver: 4.26 ERA as a Cardinal starter; 5.48 as a starter after departure.

Jason Simontacchi: 4.88 ERA as a Cardinal; 6.37 after.

I'm anxious to see how Lohse pitches his first time out. In 2008, he didn't sign until mid-March, then came into camp and was immediately the best starter in the rotation. Lohse has been good about working out and getting ready on his own, but he's 5 years older this time.

I like Lohse. He'd have been a lot better in 2009/2010 had it not been for a couple of fluke injuries. I wish him well, except when he faces the Cardinals, of course.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very good post above.

The before and after, IMO, speaks to two things:

Dave Duncan is a pretty good pitching coach

Cardinals pitching have benefited from pitching in the NL central over the past decade or so.

I agree with MurphDog, very doubtful he gets $20mm in 14-15.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very good post above.

Thanks!

...The before and after, IMO, speaks to two things:

Dave Duncan is a pretty good pitching coach

I'm reminded of the much more extensive analysis of the "Leo Mazzone effect", which concluded that pitching for Leo was worth an average 0.63 runs off a pitcher's ERA. Odd, that effect didn't carry over when Leo moved to Baltimore, did it?

I think evaluating pitching coaches, batting coaches, and managers accurately is virtually impossible. I'm willing to concede that Leo and Dave Duncan were good pitching coaches, but that's as far as I can go when trying to compare them against everyone else.

What Dave Duncan did in St. Louis was to create an "adjunct pitching coach panel". Whenever any of his starters were throwing side sessions, all the other starters were standing around observing, analyzing, and offering suggestions. This way, it wasn't just Duncan's eyes, it was 5 sets of eyes watching each pitch to see if they could pick up something.

The heart of that "adjunct pitching coach staff" was Chris Carpenter. Carpenter's leadership will be missed as much as his pitching, if not more. Adam Wainwright understands he's expected to pick up that leadership mantle, but Carpenter was unique.

...Cardinals pitching have benefited from pitching in the NL central over the past decade or so.

Ah, that old "AL superiority" shibboleth again. I don't buy it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks!

I'm reminded of the much more extensive analysis of the "Leo Mazzone effect", which concluded that pitching for Leo was worth an average 0.63 runs off a pitcher's ERA. Odd, that effect didn't carry over when Leo moved to Baltimore, did it?

You don't get pitches three inches off the plate called strikes when you are playing the Yankees and Red Sox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks!

I'm reminded of the much more extensive analysis of the "Leo Mazzone effect", which concluded that pitching for Leo was worth an average 0.63 runs off a pitcher's ERA. Odd, that effect didn't carry over when Leo moved to Baltimore, did it?

I think evaluating pitching coaches, batting coaches, and managers accurately is virtually impossible. I'm willing to concede that Leo and Dave Duncan were good pitching coaches, but that's as far as I can go when trying to compare them against everyone else.

What Dave Duncan did in St. Louis was to create an "adjunct pitching coach panel". Whenever any of his starters were throwing side sessions, all the other starters were standing around observing, analyzing, and offering suggestions. This way, it wasn't just Duncan's eyes, it was 5 sets of eyes watching each pitch to see if they could pick up something.

The heart of that "adjunct pitching coach staff" was Chris Carpenter. Carpenter's leadership will be missed as much as his pitching, if not more. Adam Wainwright understands he's expected to pick up that leadership mantle, but Carpenter was unique.

Ah, that old "AL superiority" shibboleth again. I don't buy it.

Not so much an AL superiority complex as much as the NL central has been so poor outside of St Louis. Pittsburgh, Houston, Chicago...not so strong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Milwaukee deal is $20M better than the qualifying offer. Lohse was right to take it. The only question is whether he should have held out until June 1st in hopes of getting a much better deal from a team desperate for starting pitching. I would say not.

Bernie Miklacz examines the Post-Cardinal Pitching Syndrome in today's St. Louis Post Dispatch.

Here?s a list of guys who left the Cardinals after making at least 15 starts here, with the Before and After ERAs.

...

I'm anxious to see how Lohse pitches his first time out. In 2008, he didn't sign until mid-March, then came into camp and was immediately the best starter in the rotation. Lohse has been good about working out and getting ready on his own, but he's 5 years older this time.

I like Lohse. He'd have been a lot better in 2009/2010 had it not been for a couple of fluke injuries. I wish him well, except when he faces the Cardinals, of course.

If you hadn't brought up 2008 and the freak injuries in 2009-2010 I would have. 3/33 is a good deal for Lohse and Milwaukee is a good destination for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Slight derail, but Migrant Redbird, what do you think about Wainwright's new deal?

I think it's a good deal for St. Louis, but risky. They probably purchased insurance. I think it's at or below "market value", considering recent extensions to potential FA pitchers. I was afraid the "Kyle Lohse effect" would harden the Cardinals negotiating position. I think Wainwright would have had a difficult time getting this good a contract as an FA next winter, even if he has another CYA year.

Elbow problems don't concern me that much. TJ relapse isn't all that frequent. I think it's highly likely we get the Wainwright of 2009/2010 the next few years, the guy who finished 3rd and 2nd in the CYA voting and might have won if he'd had a "freak" hairdo or hadn't been competing for votes with Carpenter on the same staff.

Wainwright is a competitor in the Chris Carpenter mode, just not as "Darth Vaderish". Adam has already acknowledged he's got to take over Chris's leadership role, but says he's not Chris's half of the "good cop/bad cop" routine.

Wainwright "loves" St. Louis (he says) and St. Louis fans return the feeling. Losing him would have alienated fans more than the defection of Pujols did. This was a great move from a public relations perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Nobody put words in your mouth.  I asked you questions.  That you can't answer them should suggest to you how thought out our positions are. 1) The goal is the World Series.  What makes you think it isn't? 2)  That's the most generic statement possible that is impossible to analyze, 3) So Elfin, Burnes, Bradish, Cano, etc.  don't count because you don't want them to count.  But other than that, he's got a bad track record of trading..... .like what trade?  Are we all supposed to go insane and only evaluate one trade- the Rodgers trade- in the most hyperbolic terms necessary to justify our hyperbole? 4) So we judge him for hypothetical trades that we didn't make and can't even be analyzed?  LOL. Flaherty was a worthless trade?  This is the same Flaherty that started Game 1 of the World Series this year, right? Oh, so you just want to cry about Rodgers ad nauseum?  Cry ahead. So you want to fire the most successful GM we've had since Pat Gillick but you haven't even thought about who'd you replace him with?  And wouldn't even bothered until he was fired?  You understand how stupid that is, right?
    • I think he’s all in. That’s why I have hope that he will resign Burnes and add some veteran offensive a talent to help the team play better in October 
    • This is as plausible a theory as any other that has been trotted out since the end of the regular season and it's one I fully subscribe to. Personally however, I think restraint is advisable when it comes to comparing his historical business leadership to his newfound role as 75 year-old billionaire owner of a a sports franchise.  Especially given his demonstrated propensity for dancing on the home team dugout during the seventh inning stretch.
    • Noted … I’d much rather have Teoscar. They would need to determine if Profar is the 2024 player or prior. 
    • Stop putting words in my mouth!    1) The goal needs to be the World Series 2) We need to spend wisely …but we need to spend 3) Oh Stop ….i gave him credit for Eflin and Burnes. The others were during the rebuild and selling trades. Which I said in my response to you,  4) It’s not one trade …. He’s tried to get help2 deadlines now. Beyond Eflin at two deadlines he’s done little to help the team reach the ultimate goal.    His moves in 2023 were Jack Flaherty who was basically worthless and Fuji who was so inconsistent that he’s not even pitching in the majors. Did I forget anyone? He did little to help an offense that was struggling mightily in 2024. He gave a lot away this deadline. They got Eflin but most everything else was mediocre or worse. The Rogers deal was just horrible. And why was he shopping in the bargain bin pile. Rogers was a 4.5 ERA starter before the trade which really wasn’t an upgrade and he crapped the bed after he got here.    I’m undecided over who I’d go after to replace Elias when the times comes.
    • In the estimation of bitter donkeys whose primary purpose for posting is to complain and criticize: infinite.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...