Perhaps your thoughts on them not signing 2 starters may turn out eventual outcome . You made your case why . However I’m of the view that they should aim to sign 2 FA starters . But Elias has shown he’s conservative and risk averse up to this point . Question is will he get more aggressive or bold now that he has a new owner ?
Nobody put words in your mouth. I asked you questions. That you can't answer them should suggest to you how thought out our positions are.
1) The goal is the World Series. What makes you think it isn't?
2) That's the most generic statement possible that is impossible to analyze,
3) So Elfin, Burnes, Bradish, Cano, etc. don't count because you don't want them to count. But other than that, he's got a bad track record of trading..... .like what trade? Are we all supposed to go insane and only evaluate one trade- the Rodgers trade- in the most hyperbolic terms necessary to justify our hyperbole?
4) So we judge him for hypothetical trades that we didn't make and can't even be analyzed? LOL.
Flaherty was a worthless trade? This is the same Flaherty that started Game 1 of the World Series this year, right?
Oh, so you just want to cry about Rodgers ad nauseum? Cry ahead.
So you want to fire the most successful GM we've had since Pat Gillick but you haven't even thought about who'd you replace him with? And wouldn't even bothered until he was fired? You understand how stupid that is, right?
This is as plausible a theory as any other that has been trotted out since the end of the regular season and it's one I fully subscribe to.
Personally however, I think restraint is advisable when it comes to comparing his historical business leadership to his newfound role as 75 year-old billionaire owner of a a sports franchise. Especially given his demonstrated propensity for dancing on the home team dugout during the seventh inning stretch.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.