Jump to content

TT: Showalter should be leery on how he uses Johnson


Tony-OH

Recommended Posts

There's a lot that goes into these decisions. I think Buck's decision to use JJ was defensible, because even though he was pitching for three days in a row, he hadn't pitched for five days before that. On the other hand, he had struggled a bit the two previous nights, throwing 23 pitches in each outing, which is much higher than normal for him. If you look at the other two times he threw three days in a row:

April 22-24: 13 and 14 pitches the two previous days.

June 9-11: 9 and 9 pitches the two previous days.

For me, this was a borderline call. I can see the argument for going with Hunter (not O'Day, who is scuffling a bit right now) there. But I'm not going to fault Buck too much for going with a guy who had reeled off 12 saves in a row and allowed 1 run in 14 appearances.

Remember though, besides the number of pitches, he has to warm up as well so you have to count those pitches as well. The numbers speak for themselves. Without a day of rest, he struggles. When he pitches in three straight days, he's been terrible on that third day.

All closer are going to blow games and have bad outings, and I really don't have a problem with using a closer in closing situations. In fact, in most cases, Johnson should be the guy, but I think Buck was really bucking (yes pun intended) the odds when he used Johnson for a 3rd day in a row to protect a one-run lead.

It is amazing though how good Johnson is when used regularly on one day rest. I realize it's hard to use him this way because save situation don't always presents themselves at the most opportune time, but with as good as Hunter is throwing this year, I'd be more apt to use him to protect one-run leads if Johnson has pitched the last two days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 102
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Remember though, besides the number of pitches, he has to warm up as well so you have to count those pitches as well. The numbers speak for themselves. Without a day of rest, he struggles. When he pitches in three straight days, he's been terrible on that third day.

All closer are going to blow games and have bad outings, and I really don't have a problem with using a closer in closing situations. In fact, in most cases, Johnson should be the guy, but I think Buck was really bucking (yes pun intended) the odds when he used Johnson for a 3rd day in a row to protect a one-run lead.

It is amazing though how good Johnson is when used regularly on one day rest. I realize it's hard to use him this way because save situation don't always presents themselves at the most opportune time, but with as good as Hunter is throwing this year, I'd be more apt to use him to protect one-run leads if Johnson has pitched the last two days.

I seam to remember Earl begging Tippy to just go out and have a 1-2-3 for a change and give his ulcer a break. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember Gregg Olson when he was the closer, and they didnt keep blown save records then, but the year he saved 37, he also lost 5 games. The year before that, he saved 31 and lost 6.

It happens.

The problem is we are not even half way through the season. If this pace keeps up Johnson will have over 10 losses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As stated by many, the simple fact is that Johnson is only effective when his sinking fastball is working and pitches are low in the strike zone. Johnson quickly and clearly signals when that isn't going to be the case, like he did on Tuesday night, and again last night. Showalter has to be more cognizant of this, especially if he is going to pitch him on 3 consecutive days. The fact that he was wildly ineffective, and perhaps lucky, on Tuesday should have sent a message.

IMO, we need someone to share the load as closer, or Buck has to have a much shorter leash on Johnson when its obvious he doesn't have his control or his sinker. It seems like such a simple solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As stated by many, the simple fact is that Johnson is only effective when his sinking fastball is working and pitches are low in the strike zone. Johnson quickly and clearly signals when that isn't going to be the case, like he did on Tuesday night, and again last night. Showalter has to be more cognizant of this, especially if he is going to pitch him on 3 consecutive days. The fact that he was wildly ineffective, and perhaps lucky, on Tuesday should have sent a message.

IMO, we need someone to share the load as closer, or Buck has to have a much shorter leash on Johnson when its obvious he doesn't have his control or his sinker. It seems like such a simple solution.

I watched that game Tuesday night, and that strike zone was moving, pitches right at the knee was being called balls, so you have to elevate the pitch and it makes it more hittable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it normal of a closer to have 6 losses in June? If this pace keeps up it will be over 10 losses.

Huh?

You said that it might be the best time to trade JJ and I asked if you thought now was a better time then last offseason. (When I wanted to trade him)

WTH does that have to do with him having six losses?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched that game Tuesday night, and that strike zone was moving, pitches right at the knee was being called balls, so you have to elevate the pitch and it makes it more hittable.

Then wouldn't it make sense to bring in Hunter, who doesn't have to work in the bottom part of the zone to be effective, instead of Johnson?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then wouldn't it make sense to bring in Hunter, who doesn't have to work in the bottom part of the zone to be effective, instead of Johnson?

I disagree, I think the tandem of Hunter to Johnson, works very well, and is their best approach. He has 27 saves and 2 wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree, I think the tandem of Hunter to Johnson, works very well, and is their best approach. He has 27 saves and 2 wins.

You were saying that the Umps were not calling the low strike correct?

Then why bring in a pitcher that needs to pitch there?

The manager should be cognizant of the strike zones of the various umpires.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You were saying that the Umps were not calling the low strike correct?

Then why bring in a pitcher that needs to pitch there?

The manager should be cognizant of the strike zones of the various umpires.

I dont get all the gloom and doom.

The man saved 51 out of 54 games last year.

He has 27 and its not the all-star break even.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...