Jump to content

Orioles messing with Gausman again what's new.


Greg

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 473
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Good and cogent observations, yet I absolutely HATE that we don't have Gausman on the mound in a POSSIBLE game vs. Tanaka.If Gausman pitches like he did vs the Red Sox against the Yankees, he might negate the dominance of Tanaka until we could figure something else out late in that game. Now its almost a guaranteed loss because we can't hope to make him a non winner for three straight decisions.

Just make sure Schoop is in the lineup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Gausman is eligible to return right after break. Buck said Gausman will no longer be on innings limit. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/orioles?src=hash">#orioles</a></p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="

">July 7, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Sounds like after break he's getting the ball every 5th day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Gausman is eligible to return right after break. Buck said Gausman will no longer be on innings limit. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/orioles?src=hash">#orioles</a></p>— Roch Kubatko (@masnRoch) <a href="
">July 7, 2014</a></blockquote>

<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

Sounds like after break he's getting the ball every 5th day.

You really did not think that Buck was going to let Chris Davis pitch, did you ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just make sure Schoop is in the lineup.
You're damn straight.
Roy's "other" favorite. :cool:
He also has two home runs against Tanaka.

Yep.

And I was there for one of them (the 3-run shot in April.) :cool:

I might have been there for the other one also, but I was in North Carolina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not sure there are too many examples of a team treating an effective starting pitcher like a yo-yo as we've done with KG.

I'd be interested in KG's real thoughts on this ..... as, on the surface, the treatment does not seem so appropriate to me (especially as part of the influence of this is his service clock. Teams play the service clock game all the time, but usually wait until May or June ad call the player up for good.

It is a delicate dance sometimes putting the best players on the field versus juggling service team. Hopefully, our GM I a good juggler.

For the record he did say this, "I just try not to think about it, to be honest," he said. "Just stay in my routine. I feel pretty good where I'm at stuff-wise, and my bullpen sessions have really been getting a lot better. Fastball command has been great of late.

"It's more of just a move to keep those guys healthy out there and be prepared for anything that happens. If something happens early in the game tonight or tomorrow, it's one of those things you'd rather be ready and prepared for it than be shooting yourself in the foot."

http://www.masnsports.com/school-of-roch/2014/07/gausman-optioned-to-norfolk.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, what are you talking about? The Orioles won the first game with Gonzalez on the mound and the second game with Tillman on the mound and yet you're putting forth the argument that our only shot against Tanaka is if Gausman is on the mound? I swear I'm trying to let silliness like this go, but I have no idea if you actually believe this sort of nonsense. We are clearly an underdog with any of our starters against Tanaka but saying we have no choice the third time without Gausman is just ludicrous. We need to stop acting like so much if this is so black and white because it just isn't. The difference between our best and worst starter is like a couple shades of gray. Same with so many of these decisions so many of us like to get indignant about.

I've attached the two box scores to jog memories.

http://espn.go.com/mlb/boxscore?gameId=340409110

http://espn.go.com/mlb/boxscore?gameId=340622110

Our decisions are wrong decisions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's usually the middle of June (if they haven't been called up already) because the Super 2 deadline would have passed, assuming they've accrued no service time. The fact that Gausman was up last year for 71 days and has been up this year is screwing with that and they're accomplishing both his FA clock and his innings pitched by sending him down. It may not be popular but I'd rather have Gausman for 2020 than for 1 start this week before the ASG.

I get the above and I understand the service time issue and what is best for the organization in the long run.

Just saying that I don't remember another effective rookie starting pitcher who received this "up and down" treatment.

He's going to do what he's told to do, but that doesn't mean he has to like it especialy when the decisions are influenced by HIS service time. I am sure it's also tough to be a critical contributor to the team and yet not get to be with the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get the above and I understand the service time issue and what is best for the organization in the long run.

Just saying that I don't remember another effective rookie starting pitcher who received this "up and down" treatment.

He's going to do what he's told to do, but that doesn't mean he has to like it especialy when the decisions are influenced by HIS service time. I am sure it's also tough to be a critical contributor to the team and yet not get to be with the team.

If the O's have sat down with him and explained why they are doing it and also indicate they see him in the rotation in the second half, my guess is Kevin will sit down with a bag of powdered doughnuts and day dream about his first playoff start with a smile.

I really think its all about communication and letting guys know why your doing what your doing. Most guys get irked when the communication piece is not there. DD does enough roster shuffling that I think he already understands the value of that. I feel pretty sure that KG knows and has been told how important the O's see him to their future. I also think if it help the O's get in the playoffs and potentially gets him a playoff start (dependent on performance) he recognizes that value as well. I think its far more distressing to fans than KG in actuality

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the O's have sat down with him and explained why they are doing it and also indicate they see him in the rotation in the second half, my guess is Kevin will sit down with a bag of powdered doughnuts and day dream about his first playoff start with a smile.

I really think its all about communication and letting guys know why your doing what your doing. Most guys get irked when the communication piece is not there. DD does enough roster shuffling that I think he already understands the value of that. I feel pretty sure that KG knows and has been told how important the O's see him to their future. I also think if it help the O's get in the playoffs and potentially gets him a playoff start (dependent on performance) he recognizes that value as well. I think its far more distressing to fans than KG in actuality

Exactly. Dan is going to stress the roster. It's what he does. He sees it is a way to gain an advantage. People can argue against it all they want but it seems to be working pretty well imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, what are you talking about? The Orioles won the first game with Gonzalez on the mound and the second game with Tillman on the mound and yet you're putting forth the argument that our only shot against Tanaka is if Gausman is on the mound? I swear I'm trying to let silliness like this go, but I have no idea if you actually believe this sort of nonsense. We are clearly an underdog with any of our starters against Tanaka but saying we have no choice the third time without Gausman is just ludicrous. We need to stop acting like so much if this is so black and white because it just isn't. The difference between our best and worst starter is like a couple shades of gray. Same with so many of these decisions so many of us like to get indignant about.

I've stopped thinking that there is much thinking to Roy's posts. It's pretty much from the gut to the keyboard without much in the way of a processing mechanism. I think that's by design. Roy isn't here to be intellectual imo (I'm sure he can be). Just consider him an off the cuff emotional character/fan and don't take much seriously and you'll enjoy him a lot more.

Besides, you don't want to be messing with the Firestone jinx do you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get the above and I understand the service time issue and what is best for the organization in the long run.

Just saying that I don't remember another effective rookie starting pitcher who received this "up and down" treatment.

He's going to do what he's told to do, but that doesn't mean he has to like it especialy when the decisions are influenced by HIS service time. I am sure it's also tough to be a critical contributor to the team and yet not get to be with the team.

Gausman has been caught in a numbers crunch. The up and down treatment is mostly because for the first time in more than a few years, the Orioles have 5 legitimate starting pitchers ahead of him. But my understanding is that this has had more to do with controlling Gausman's innings pitched than anything to do with his service time. They purposely kept his innings down the first half so that he could pitch the entire second half, including playoff games. It will be interesting to see what happens with the starting pitching after the AS break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...