Jump to content

Who is in the Hall of Icons?


Frobby

Recommended Posts

I'd put Clemente in.

Reggie?

In his lone season with the Orioles, Jackson set the franchise record (1901-Present) for most consecutive games with a home run (6), which Chris Davis tied in 2012.

Also, he set a career-high in stolen bases (28) that same year, even though he missed the first month of the season due to a holdout.

Reg made a mark everywhere he went ...... even if it was only for one season. :cool:

What I remember about that season was that he held out for the first month (despite being under contract) and then was pretty terrible for the next six weeks (.649 OPS on June 15 in 35 games). The O's were 25-31 at that point. From there until the end of the season, Reggie hit .302/.375/.552 and the O's went 63-43. If Reggie hadn't held out that year, we might have made the pennant race pretty interesting.

I remember that year very clearly.

Earl Weaver once stated that he believed that the Orioles would have won the division had Jackson not held out.

Well, in my rat's ass of an opinion, there is NO WAY that the Orioles would have won the division that year. It was the Yankees' year, all the way, and nothing ....... not even having Reggie Jackson for the 15 games in which he didn't have him due to his holdout, and/or if he had heated up sooner than he did that season had he been in spring training from the get-go ...... was going to change that. The 1975 Orioles had slipped a bit from the '73 and '74 division winning teams, and the 1976 Orioles had slipped a bit from the '75 team.

The Orioles went on a big winning streak near the end of the season, winning 13 out of 16 games, including a 4-game sweep of the Yankees ....... but by that time, even though the Orioles had not yet been mathematically eliminated, the race for the flag had been long over. The Yankees were coasting, similar to the 2000 season in which they lost 15 out of their final 18 games, but still easily held off the Red Sox to win the division title.

After beating the Royals in that year's A.L.C.S., the Yankees were swept in 4 games in the World Series by the Reds.

The one missing ingredient that those American League champion Yankees didn't have in 1976 that pushed them over the top in the World Series in 1977 was ...... Reggie Jackson. The Yankees had lost 17-game winner Dock Ellis in a trade with the Athletics, but Mike Torrez (acquired in the Ellis trade), along with free-agent acquisition Don Gullett, and young upstart Ron Guidry made up for that loss.

Fortunately for the Orioles, the gradual downturn that they sustained during the 1974, 1975, and 1976 seasons did not continue in 1977, as many were expecting ...... thanks to the emergence of a few young rookies named Eddie Murray, Rich Dauer, Denny Martinez, and Mike Flanagan, and a big trade with the Yankees from the previous season, which netted them Rudy May and a few young, up-and-comers named Scott McGregor, Tippy Martinez, and Rick Dempsey, all of whom contributed greatly to that 1977 Orioles team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the thought behind the list - maybe it's like "players my mom knows." I would also add Clemente (despite the bias from his being my Dad's favorite player, the plane crash tragedy put him in the minds of everyone from that time) and Koufax (different tragedy, similarly visible).

Stan Musial probably doesn't belong on this list. He's obviously a top-10 and maybe top-5 player but there's a reason he's often cited as the most underrated all-time great. For whatever reason (St Louis?) just not as memorable as others.

I think it depends on where you grew up. If you grew up in between the coasts, he was the hero for kids from Arkansas to North Dakota. A

I'd also consider Yogi Berra. Contribution to popular culture in addition to his outstanding on-field performance.

Bonds/Clemens have "a status that will last forever" - not sure if you meant purely positive icons.

I think it depends on where you grew up. If you grew up in between the coasts, he was the hero for kids from Arkansas to North Dakota. As a sidenote, Grisham has a nice book called Painted House where the main character grows up on his farm pretending he's Stan Musial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it depends on where you grew up. If you grew up in between the coasts, he was the hero for kids from Arkansas to North Dakota. As a sidenote, Grisham has a nice book called Painted House where the main character grows up on his farm pretending he's Stan Musial.

Thanks to AM radio too. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • One good Bud Norris year out of Rogers would be nice.  Two would be amazing.
    • Except he really isn't hurting the team at SS.  Again, he's an 8+ WAR player this year.  I don't know why anyone would want to argue for moving him off a position where he's performing at an MVP level.  This season is already as valuable as Ripken's '83 MVP season and more valuable than any other season Ripken had except 1984 and his monster 1991 campaign. I saw Cal play at shortstop, too.  And I think when we all think of Cal at shortstop, we think of the refined version....the guy that made 3 errors in a season (and somehow lost the Gold Glove to Ozzie f'ing Guillen) and the guy that had a whole chapter dedicated to him in George Will's "Men at Work." You neglected to respond to the idea that Gunnar can get better at the position.  There's a lot to like with him defensively already, but he's not a fully finished product and I don't think anyone here is arguing that he is.  I suspect that if you took Cal in his second season and matched that up with Gunnar, you'd see some similarities.  I also suspect that Gunnar isn't the defender that he'll be in 5 or 6 years from now, just like Ripken wasn't the best defender at SS in his early seasons. Gunnar is a 5 tool player.  There's nothing that he can't do on a baseball field and I'm sure if you put him in a "traditional power position" like a corner outfield spot, he'd be just fine. But I find it funny that you want to be called old fashioned, yet here we are discussing Cal Ripken, the guy that broke the mold for what a shortstop can be and turned it into a power position.  Ripken was ultimate anti-traditionalist of the position and responsible for the slew of power hitting shortstops that came in after him.  And quite frankly, I don't know why we're talking about power when we're debating defense.
    • Yeah, I agree something like this might happen some day, but only if the union comes around to believing MLB is on shaky financial footing -- if and when that ever happens. I don't like the idea of voiding a players' contract then and there, but perhaps performing below a certain level would trigger some contract years in the future to automatically become option years.  Something along those lines. It's hard to imagine deals like this today, except possibly here and there for players who are known to be very inconsistent.  As long as baseball is considered financially healthy I'm sure the union would push back strongly against deals like this, especially in large numbers.
    • Thank you. I knew there was something bogus about that post. I saw Cal play SS. And Gunnar is no Cal at SS. Not even close. And this is coming from a big fan of Gunnar. I would like to see him play a traditional power position. Call me old fashioned. He’s hurting the team at SS. 
    • Interesting.  We live in a data obsessed world now but it's not the answer to everything.  There should be a mix.  
    • Tobias Myers for the brewers tonight: 6 innings 4H -1ER 1BB 11 Ks. not bad at all!
    • I doubt solid MLB pitchers can be acquired just by trading position players the vast majority of the time.  Look at how we acquired Bradish and Povich -- by trading solid (at the time anyway) MLB level pitchers.  In those trades we were on the other end, but we forced teams to trade good young pitchers for Bundy and Lopez respectively.  Now we did acquire McDermott and Seth Johnson by trading Trey Mancini.  So it does happen that pitching can sometimes be acquired trading only a position player, but Mancini had had a strong major league career to that point.  My point is I don't think you can expect to acquire pitching only by trading position players -- but if you can it may need to be a strong veteran that is not easy to part with. Perhaps we could acquire Tarik Skubal for just Jackson Holliday -- or Holliday plus one or two other strong position prospects.  But that would be a whole other level of a blockbuster trade. Also, I'm not sure how we can say the system is bereft of homegrown minor league pitching talent and then complain that we traded Baumeister and Chace -- two homegrown minor league pitchers that everyone here seems to agree are talented.  We can criticize the trade, but clearly there was and probably still are some desirable arms in the system that we'd rather not trade.  No, none of the ones Elias drafted have made it to the bigs yet, but maybe those two would have been among the first.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...