Jump to content

Orioles 6th in SI Power Rankings


MeSoHardy

Recommended Posts

oo

(AUGUST 11th)

The Orioles hold at # 5.

http://espn.go.com/mlb/powerrankings

1)1 Athletics (72-45)

2)1 Angels (68-49)

3)1 Dodgers (67-52)

4)1 Tigers (63-52)

5)1 ORIOLES (67-50)

6)1 Nationals (63-53)

7)1 Brewers (65-53)

8)1 Pirates (62-55)

9)1 Giants (62-56)

10) Royals (63-53)

11) Cardinals (62-54)

12) YANKEES (61-56)

13) Braves (60-57)

14) BLUE JAYS (63-56)

15) Mariners (62-555)

16) Reds (60-58)

17) D-RAYS (57-60)

18) Indians (59-59)

19) Marlins (57-60)

20) Mets (56-62)

21) White Sox (56-63)

22) Padres (54-62)

23) Twins (52-64)

24) RED SOX (52-65)

25) Cubs (50-66)

25) Phillies (53-65)

27) Diamondbacks (51-67)

28) Astros (49-69)

29) Rangers (46-71)

30) Rockies (46-71)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 140
  • Created
  • Last Reply

The way I see power rankings is that they're supposed to be about who's playing the best right now and is good in general, so with Oakland's record they're the auto #1 but you look at the Angels and they're 4-6 in their last 10, we're 7-3, and we've beat them a bunch lately, their record is only better than ours by 1 game, so we should clearly be ahead of them... Meanwhile, we're hotter than the Tigers as well, and are 3 games up on them, so we should be ahead of them too... but if the people doing the ranking are taking into account, like, pitching staffs for the playoffs and stuff, then the Tigers' high ranking makes sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read this morning (so forgive me if I have it slightly wrong) that only four teams are on pace for 90 wins while 11 teams hit that mark in 2013.

I haven't done any research on this, but wouldn't it follow logically that teams would increase their win paces at the end of the season following deadline deals? That the top third of the league would win more games down the stretch as the bottom third has traded away some stud players and is trying out young guys? Essentially the records at the top end and bottom end of the spectrum would diverge away from the mean more dramatically than they did in the first 60% or so of the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't done any research on this, but wouldn't it follow logically that teams would increase their win paces at the end of the season following deadline deals? That the top third of the league would win more games down the stretch as the bottom third has traded away some stud players and is trying out young guys? Essentially the records at the top end and bottom end of the spectrum would diverge away from the mean more dramatically than they did in the first 60% or so of the season.
One year ago today, 11 teams were on pace for 90 wins, including the Orioles.

Note, the Orioles on August 11, 2013 were 5.5 games ahead of the Yankees, and as we all know we ended up in a tie with them.

ETA: this week is a perfect example of why you shouldn't put any stock in ESPN's weekly rankings. Detroit and the Angels went 2-5 and the O's went 5-2, and the rankings went unchanged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The voters this week were Jayson Stark, Tim Kurkjian and Dave Schoenfield.

I'm really shocked the Tigers and Dodgers are ahead of the Orioles right now. It's plausible that one of those voters actually had Baltimore lower than the Brewers or Nationals if the mean rests at 5th. It really is shocking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The voters this week were Jayson Stark, Tim Kurkjian and Dave Schoenfield.

I'm really shocked the Tigers and Dodgers are ahead of the Orioles right now. It's plausible that one of those voters actually had Baltimore lower than the Brewers or Nationals if the mean rests at 5th. It really is shocking.

I agree its insulting and ridiculous but fortunately our team knows what matters and that is winning games. Stark, Kukijan and Schoenfield should be embarrassed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait, can someone please explain to me why the Tigers are ahead of us?

Because the baseball writers at ESPN love to slobber over big market teams or teams with big names. That and the fact that we are ahead of their beloved BroSox and MFY. That means they will have to slum more covering this team than being wined and dined in the big city *being sarcastic*

We have a blue collar team that is not their cup of tea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oo

(AUGUST 11th)

The Orioles hold at # 5.

http://espn.go.com/mlb/powerrankings

1)1 Athletics (72-45)

2)1 Angels (68-49)

3)1 Dodgers (67-52)

4)1 Tigers (63-52)

5)1 ORIOLES (67-50)

6)1 Nationals (63-53)

7)1 Brewers (65-53)

8)1 Pirates (62-55)

9)1 Giants (62-56)

10) Royals (63-53)

11) Cardinals (62-54)

12) YANKEES (61-56)

13) Braves (60-57)

14) BLUE JAYS (63-56)

15) Mariners (62-555)

16) Reds (60-58)

17) D-RAYS (57-60)

18) Indians (59-59)

19) Marlins (57-60)

20) Mets (56-62)

21) White Sox (56-63)

22) Padres (54-62)

23) Twins (52-64)

24) RED SOX (52-65)

25) Cubs (50-66)

25) Phillies (53-65)

27) Diamondbacks (51-67)

28) Astros (49-69)

29) Rangers (46-71)

30) Rockies (46-71)

Just a little bit of fun, in between games.

Fortunately it's not like college football, where you have to be concerned about "getting your shot" via "style points," strength of schedule, opinions of the sportswriters and the other coaches, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Because the baseball writers at ESPN love to slobber over big market teams or teams with big names. That and the fact that we are ahead of their beloved BroSox and MFY. That means they will have to slum more covering this team than being wined and dined in the big city *being sarcastic*

We have a blue collar team that is not their cup of tea.

The irony here is that the orioles truly are a hard-working gritty team who takes games one game at a time and grinds out the season, all while having a great time doing it. This is the image espn painted and fetishized for the Red Sox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

oo

(AUGUST 18th)

The Orioles hold at # 5 for the 3rd straight week

http://espn.go.com/mlb/powerrankings

1)1 Angels (72-50)

2)1 Athletics (73-51)

3)1 Nationals (69-53)

4)1 Dodgers (70-56)

5)1 ORIOLES (70-52)

6)1 Royals (68-55)

7)1 Brewers (70-55)

8)1 Tigers (66-56)

9)1 Mariners (67-56)

10) Cardinals (66 -57)

11) Pirates (64-60)

12) Giants (65-58)

13) BLUE JAYS (64-61)

14) Braves (64-60)

15) YANKEES (63-59)

16) D-RAYS (61-63)

17) Reds (61-63)

18) Indians (62-61)

19) Marlins (62-62)

20) Padres (58-65)

21) Mets (59-66)

22) White Sox (59-65)

23) RED SOX (56-67)

24) Twins (55-67)

25) Phillies (54-70)

26) Cubs (53-70)

27) Diamondbacks (53-71)

28) Astros (52-73)

29) Rangers (48-76)

30) Rockies (49-75)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...