Jump to content

Orioles: Best Winning % in Majors When Scoring First


Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
  • 8 months later...
Gah why would you bump such a thread When the title isn't even reflective of this year? Sometimes you bump meaningful threads but for the most part you bump stuff that isn't worth it. Especially when it is years old.

It's in regard to to the the same subject.

It's from last year (not "years"), and the Orioles are having a difficult time winning games in which they haven't scored 1st. Without looking it up, the 14-6 record when scoring first is probably not so unusual, but the 1-12 record when not scoring first would appear to be significant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The O's have largely been playing five inning games this year. They are 13-1 when ahead after five innings, 2-14 when losing after five. They've only played three games that were tied after five innings, and they are 0-3 in those games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...


The O's have largely been playing five inning games this year.

They are 13-1 when ahead after five innings.

They are 2-14 when losing after five innings.

They are 0-3 when tied after five innings.


The Orioles are 17-2 when ahead after five innings.

The Orioles are 4-16 when losing after five innings.

The Orioles are 1-6 when tied after five innings.

Since your post, the Orioles are 2-2 when losing after 5 innings, which seems somewhat encouraging considering that they were previously 2-14 in said situations.

They are 3-1 (since your post) when winning after 5 innings, which is good ....... a slight decrease in winning percentage in said situations after starting the season at 13-1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



I think you have us all befuddled here Patrick.

Ahh, thanks for pointing that out.

I fixed it.

I had cut and pasted the winning portion of the sentence without changing the corresponding words to "losing" and "tied" in the second and third sentences.

Have a greenie, Jay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Yep.   I'll be pleasantly surprised if he makes the OD roster.    Verducci Effect or not, the benefit for the Club if it can acquire control of his 2029 is large.     Grayson Rodriguez's 2022 platform has not been enough for Mike Elias to plan to pitch him 26 weeks or 33 starts in MLB in 2023.     The rest is just a question of asset management. Pittsburgh Roansy Contreras is a talented young pitcher maybe close to Grayson's ballpark, has been the 100-loss Pirates second best starter this year by ERA+, and was optioned back to AAA yesterday like he was Nick Vespi or something.   There's a chicken-egg game with SP's building up to take the full Jordan Lyles complement, and Clubs "protecting their best interests" by looking out for them.   And then, the meta-game where the MATH doesn't make sense for anyone except maybe 10 guys per league to take the full Jordan Lyles complement. It isn't that Grayson Rodriguez isn't as awesome as Gunnar Henderson...he just isn't ramped up enough.   And competitively, you aren't maximizing the roster well enough on a daily basis if "tired Grayson Rodriguez" gets one of your 13 precious spots that day. In terms of what the 2023 Orioles will be, I hope they use him straight out of the gate, and start tinkering with load management if being the 6th best or better team in the league looks likely after a few months.   But I don't think that's what will happen.     The Mariners Logan Gilbert and George Kirby cases this year are decent analogs, and curious to see what they have left for this month.
    • Yes, at 3B/SS/2B.  860 OPS at 1B could be 750 at the big league level, which gets you Mountcastle.  With plus defense across other IF positions, that's positive WAR.
    • I am glad we don't have to choose at least not now anyway.  I would also go with Adley for the intangibles.
    • This probably means we get a grand finale of the Aguilar and Odor Show in game 2. 
    • Why are they even playing these games, everything is set for the playoffs. I would hate to see somebody pick-up a significant injury in a meaningless game. 
    • Yea, I agree with this.  He’s definitely down the list of guys I would cut but I also wouldn’t hesitate to do it if we had to.  Chances are they won’t need to add 15 guys to the 40 man this offseason, so it’s probably a moot point but once you get into that area of needing to drop the 10th guy off the current 40 man list, his spot becomes precarious.
    • The orioles will probably have around 38 guys on the 40 man by the rule 5 draft. If you’re taking more guys off of it then you need to put more players on. There aren’t that many options to add that I see a situation where bubble guys like Zimmerman are left off and bubble guys like Handley aren’t added. 
  • Popular Contributors

  • Create New...