Jump to content

Don't Look Now but Joseph Might be a Better a Catcher for the Orioles...


itscbm5042

Recommended Posts

Hear me out, he has been masterful with the pitching staff and I think calls a better game than Wieters, the staff ERA would reflect that. His power is coming around and there is room for growth. His defense is just as good and he doesn't cost $$$. I 100% trust Joseph with this staff more than I do Wieters. Just my opinion but I think holding onto him and letting Wieters go is in the Orioles best interest and better for the pitching staff. We all know that winning is about pitching and if we have to sacrifice some offense at the catcher position to better manage our rotation then I am willing to do that.

Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 226
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Hear me out, he has been masterful with the pitching staff and I think calls a better game than Wieters, the staff ERA would reflect that. His power is coming around and there is room for growth. His defense is just as good and he doesn't cost $$$. I 100% trust Joseph with this staff more than I do Wieters. Just my opinion but I think holding onto him and letting Wieters go is in the Orioles best interest and better for the pitching staff. We all know that winning is about pitching and if we have to sacrifice some offense at the catcher position to better manage our rotation then I am willing to do that.

Thoughts?

I've been extremely impressed with Joseph behind the plate and I agree with you whole heartily about the game calling. The only question is the bat and whether his defense can make up for his bat. He's probably destined to be a back up long term but if the Orioles can build an offense that allows them to overcome his bat I'd have no problem with him starting at catcher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hear me out, he has been masterful with the pitching staff and I think calls a better game than Wieters, the staff ERA would reflect that. His power is coming around and there is room for growth. His defense is just as good and he doesn't cost $$$. I 100% trust Joseph with this staff more than I do Wieters. Just my opinion but I think holding onto him and letting Wieters go is in the Orioles best interest and better for the pitching staff. We all know that winning is about pitching and if we have to sacrifice some offense at the catcher position to better manage our rotation then I am willing to do that.

Thoughts?

2014 fWAR

Wieters (26 games) .8

Joseph (49 games) .6

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt I-want-big-money Wieters or Joseph..... let me think!!!

I know one thing, the pitching staff has not looked this good in a LONG time and I don't think it's a coincidence.

If this year is written off................. Matt comes back next year...... and the staff reverts back........... I won't be surprised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that happens, maybe we can trade Wieters for a nice return of future prospects or a good LF..

Wieters not gonna bring back anything good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've been extremely impressed with Joseph behind the plate and I agree with you whole heartily about the game calling. The only question is the bat and whether his defense can make up for his bat. He's probably destined to be a back up long term but if the Orioles can build an offense that allows them to overcome his bat I'd have no problem with him starting at catcher.

I hope his bat comes around and stays around.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt I-want-big-money Wieters or Joseph..... let me think!!!

Who doesn't want big money? Should Wieters forfeit his salary? Wieters is way better than Joseph. He is a month older than Joseph - has an OPS .100 points higher while earning 2,300 more ABs. Did anyone consider that from a pitch-calling standpoint that the improvement in the pitchers has more to do with the pitchers than with pitch-calling?

I love Joseph, but the idea that he beats out Matt Wieters is crack-smoking talk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who doesn't want big money? Should Wieters forfeit his salary? Wieters is way better than Joseph. He is a month older than Joseph - has an OPS .100 points higher while earning 2,300 more ABs. Did anyone consider that from a pitch-calling standpoint that the improvement in the pitchers has more to do with the pitchers than with pitch-calling?

I love Joseph, but the idea that he beats out Matt Wieters is crack-smoking talk.

I think if you are making the pitch calling argument in favor of Joseph, you probably thought Wieters didn't call a good game even before this season and Joseph. So the improvement in the staff is just evidence of that, but not necessarily the deciding factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if you are making the pitch calling argument in favor of Joseph' date=' you probably thought Wieters didn't call a good game even before this season and Joseph. So the improvement in the staff is just evidence of that, but not necessarily the deciding factor.[/quote']

I think pitch-calling is something that would be easily fixed by the coaching staff - so that if they thought Wieters stunk at pitch calling they would work with him on that. I think it is much more likely that our pitchers are getting better and Joseph is benefiting from that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Could it be that they allowed the Gnats to reside within 30 minutes of their home. Effectively cutting their market in half? 
    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...