Jump to content

New Pace of Game Rules


TonySoprano

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

This even necessarily directed at current fans but more so at attracting the younger generation. If you want to attract new fans you don't want them bored after their first game. Don't know if these rules actually solve any of that.

I actually like the IBB rule. I know there have been some random events to happen (Vlad) during IBB, but what is the point really in making them throw the 4 pitches. There is also the tendency for some pitchers to lose some command after a IBB, but that goes for both teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So now, whenever the manager wants the catcher to go talk to the pitcher the second baseman will do this:

oscar_hhbyew7lcrnt167a5j0zw9bv1.jpg?t=1346147587&w=640&h=360&quality=97&cropTo=top

I'm all for speeding up the game, but conferences between players is not a serious game-delaying problem, IMO. Trainer visits take a lot longer than catcher visits to the mound.

I am also not sure that 2 minutes and 30 seconds is a reasonable time allotment to allow a reliever to walk in from the bullpen and throw 8 warm-up pitches. I don't want my big hitter hit in the head by a pitch because the the pitcher wasn't allowed enough time to warm up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So now, whenever the manager wants the catcher to go talk to the pitcher the second baseman will do this:

oscar_hhbyew7lcrnt167a5j0zw9bv1.jpg?t=1346147587&w=640&h=360&quality=97&cropTo=top

I'm all for speeding up the game, but conferences between players is not a serious game-delaying problem, IMO. Trainer visits take a lot longer than catcher visits to the mound.

I am also not sure that 2 minutes and 30 seconds is a reasonable time allotment to allow a reliever to walk in from the bullpen and throw 8 warm-up pitches. I don't want my big hitter hit in the head by a pitch because the the pitcher wasn't allowed enough time to warm up.

I have a feeling that unusual injuries in key moments will be heavily scrutinized.

And if you don't think 2:30 is enough time for Joba to gather up the wheelbarrow, hoist his beard and substantial girth into it, and haul it out to the mound... well, maybe he needs to find his way to the dugout prior to the official pitching change. Or bring back bullpen carts. Or just not change pitchers every eight pitches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So now, whenever the manager wants the catcher to go talk to the pitcher the second baseman will do this:

oscar_hhbyew7lcrnt167a5j0zw9bv1.jpg?t=1346147587&w=640&h=360&quality=97&cropTo=top

I'm all for speeding up the game, but conferences between players is not a serious game-delaying problem, IMO. Trainer visits take a lot longer than catcher visits to the mound.

I am also not sure that 2 minutes and 30 seconds is a reasonable time allotment to allow a reliever to walk in from the bullpen and throw 8 warm-up pitches. I don't want my big hitter hit in the head by a pitch because the the pitcher wasn't allowed enough time to warm up.

I think that this is the operative word in this scenario.

If the pitcher jogs the 400 feet, he should have plenty of time for his warm up pitches.

Besides, he should be pretty much ready to go after he has warmed up in the pen.

I think this portion of the new rules should be called the Fernando Rodney rule.

It must have taken him 4 minutes to get to the mound in a game against the Orioles earlier in the year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that this is the operative word in this scenario.

If the pitcher jogs the 400 feet, he should have plenty of time for his warm up pitches.

Besides, he should be pretty much ready to go after he has warmed up in the pen.

I think this portion of the new rules should be called the Fernando Rodney rule.

It must have taken him 4 minutes to get to the mound in a game against the Orioles earlier in the year.

That was because he had left his quiver in the bullpen and had to go back and get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That was because he had left his quiver in the bullpen and had to go back and get it.

Actually, I think he was ticked because the Mariners scored a couple of runs in the top half of the ninth to make it a non save situation.

However, he did get to shoot his arrow, so I guess it worked out for him in the end.:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cricket

Yeah, unfortunately it hasn't taken off as a modern sport here in the US, so I can't speak to much of its rules. The last thing I want to see in baseball is a batter looking behind him at a 20 second "shot clock" so he doesn't take a strike call.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, unfortunately it hasn't taken off as a modern sport here in the US, so I can't speak to much of its rules. The last thing I want to see in baseball is a batter looking behind him at a 20 second "shot clock" so he doesn't take a strike call.

Maybe they could figure out when an average game started in 1920, figure out when the sun goes down that day, subtract one from the other, and that's how long the game lasts. At that point it's called due to darkness. Might be a big incentive for everyone to not stroll in from the bullpen, or adjust the batting gloves after each pitch.

For the first 100ish years of baseball history there very much was a clock. I'd bet Cubs games got a lot longer when Wrigley got lights.

Edit: I've seen quotes from cricketers along the lines of "it ain't a real sport unless it takes five days."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe they could figure out when an average game started in 1920, figure out when the sun goes down that day, subtract one from the other, and that's how long the game lasts. At that point it's called due to darkness. Might be a big incentive for everyone to not stroll in from the bullpen, or adjust the batting gloves after each pitch.

For the first 100ish years of baseball history there very much was a clock. I'd bet Cubs games got a lot longer when Wrigley got lights.

Edit: I've seen quotes from cricketers along the lines of "it ain't a real sport unless it takes five days."

I always try to understand your posts, but they are always just musing and rambling, and not much else. You know exactly what I'm saying, yet you can't for some reason, just ever answer something directly without having to prove that you know stuff about baseball from 100 years ago.

Sure, there is a clock when you have no lights in your stadium and it gets dark. It's not 100 years ago, everyone has electricity in their stadiums now. The times from the bullpen are easily remedied, just cut back the amount of commercials that air during pitching changes, which most likely have more of an effect than Chamberlain looking for a wheelbarrow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always try to understand your posts, but they are always just musing and rambling, and not much else. You know exactly what I'm saying, yet you can't for some reason, just never answer something directly without having to prove that you know stuff about baseball from 100 years ago.

Sure, there is a clock when you have no lights in your stadium and it gets dark. It's not 100 years ago, everyone has electricity in their stadiums now. The times from the bullpen are easily remedied, just cut back the amount of commercials that air during pitching changes, which most likely have more of an effect than Chamberlain looking for a wheelbarrow.

I'll get right to the point: For 100 years players and umpires had a huge incentive to keep the pace of play up. And they played 2:00 ballgames. Now that the incentive is gone we play 3-4 hour games. It can be fixed if someone has the will. It needs to be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll get right to the point: For 100 years players and umpires had a huge incentive to keep the pace of play up. And they played 2:00 ballgames. Now that the incentive is gone we play 3-4 hour games. It can be fixed if someone has the will. It needs to be.

I don't see any evidence that this is a need.

I think most of us would like to have it happen. I don't think the future health of the sport is necessarily predicated upon it happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll get right to the point: For 100 years players and umpires had a huge incentive to keep the pace of play up. And they played 2:00 ballgames. Now that the incentive is gone we play 3-4 hour games. It can be fixed if someone has the will. It needs to be.

How many of those games were on television? Obviously pace of play could be sped up but I don't think it's fair to point out 2 hour game times back before stadium lights and regional sports networks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...