Jump to content

"Every organization now thinks it has pitching, No one can find bats."


weams

Recommended Posts

I can't help but wonder if the O's success in 2014 inspired the Blue Jays and Red Sox to put their starting pitching needs on the back burner in order to beef up the middle of their lineups.

Wouldn't true attention to the successes of the 2012-2014 Orioles, while acknowledging the importance of SLG, see team defense as one of the key differentiators?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply
They don't release their mistakes like the Bronx Boys do. And yes, the Luxury tax makes a zero sum of sorts. Why do you think the Dodgers are cutting payroll? They could afford a half billion dollar payroll.

Even assuming Boston is getting close to whatever their specific payroll limit is, they also have the prospects to trade for cost controlled pitching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even assuming Boston is getting close to whatever their specific payroll limit is' date=' they also have the prospects to trade for cost controlled pitching.[/quote']

Well they have Betts. I am not sure any of their other prospects are coveted. Much. Weren't they all busts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Baseball is a zero sum game." Wish I knew who said that first.

The only thing that's changed is the median line. You can win with better pitching/defense than the opponent and you can win with better hitting than the opponent. The idea that hitters are any more or less valuable than they've always been is fictitious. And if every team thinks they have the piching, well... consider that last year the following AL teams gave up more runs per game than league average: Toronto, Detroit, Boston, Houston, Chicago, Texas and Minnesota. One of those teams made the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you are saying all FA hitters should get qualifying offers?

Not at all, and I'm not sure where you got that idea. I'm simply saying that bats have innately less risk, are a rarer commodity and are therefore more valuable. Good pitching is still a nice thing to have, it's just become a much easier thing to have then it was even as little as 5 years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not at all, and I'm not sure where you got that idea. I'm simply saying that bats have innately less risk, are a rarer commodity and are therefore more valuable. Good pitching is still a nice thing to have, it's just become a much easier thing to have then it was even as little as 5 years ago.

Got it. Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't true attention to the successes of the 2012-2014 Orioles, while acknowledging the importance of SLG, see team defense as one of the key differentiators?

I'm not sure what that has to do with what the Red Sox and Blue Jays actually did (which is what I was referring to).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't help but wonder if the O's success in 2014 inspired the Blue Jays and Red Sox to put their starting pitching needs on the back burner in order to beef up the middle of their lineups.

If they actually paid attention, they'd notice that the Orioles were 6th in runs scored but 3rd in fewest runs allowed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well they have Betts. I am not sure any of their other prospects are coveted. Much. Weren't they all busts?

Xander Bogaerts, Christian Vazquez, Blake Swihart, Rusney Castillo and Rafael Devers is a pretty nice group of young talent.

Bogaerts struggled but to call him a bust would be like saying Schoop was a bust. The numbers do not say all you need to know. Bogaerts is going to be very good IMO.

Hopefully the Red Sox will be stupid enough to move a lot of that young talent for an overpaid pitcher who will be stinking it up in a few years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bogaerts struggled but to call him a bust would be like saying Schoop was a bust. The numbers do not say all you need to know. Bogaerts is going to be very good IMO.

Yeah, I do find it funny how some posters will slam Bogaerts (.660 OPS) and Bradley (.531) and yet find no fault with Schoop (.530). I have to say that Bogaerts was more erratic on defense than I expected, though.

Edit: I don't know where I got the idea that Schoop's OPS was .530 last year. .598 is the correct figure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Xander Bogaerts, Christian Vazquez, Blake Swihart, Rusney Castillo and Rafael Devers is a pretty nice group of young talent.

Bogaerts struggled but to call him a bust would be like saying Schoop was a bust. The numbers do not say all you need to know. Bogaerts is going to be very good IMO.

Hopefully the Red Sox will be stupid enough to move a lot of that young talent for an overpaid pitcher who will be stinking it up in a few years.

Castillo is worth his salary or less. Probably less. Bogaerts has a bloom off him. The others are good, but won't bring back a Hamels.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...