Jump to content

Front Office issues


eddie83

Recommended Posts

So he is going to reveal his sources?

When this story broke I thought Rosenthal went out of his way to go after the a Orioles and not the White Sox and I said so .

I don't know why a Boston writer and MLB Network corespondent would get loose with something just for the heck of it. If the argument is that he is close to DD then that would indicate even more there is something to it.

I believe there's a bit of tension there. And I don't care. If Duquette offers his resignation now, we can consider it. Otherwise he should do his job to the best of his ability. And I'm sure he will.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply
I believe there's a bit of tension there. And I don't care. If Duquette offers his resignation now, we can consider it. Otherwise he should do his job to the best of his ability. And I'm sure he will.

All I want is what is best for the Orioles. I think Buck would be a handful for any GM to work with. I am not taking sides here, just want us to be working together in a heathy environment. In all organizations there isn't 100% agreement on all decisions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ding ding ding ding ding.

I don't really see the relevance. We've been to the playoffs two of the last four years. We had 14 straight losing seasons and had been under 70 wins something like 5 years in a row the last time we had a GM search. The circumstances are very different.

If you are saying another candidate wouldn't want the job because Duquette was treated poorly here or wasn't given free reign to do his job, then I disagree vehemently with that. I'm sure most GM's would love to have their deal ripped up and be given a six year deal one year after signing a three-year contract. And Duquette was given a ton of latitude to run the front office as he's seen fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really see the relevance. We've been to the playoffs two of the last four years. We had 14 straight losing seasons and had been under 70 wins something like 5 years in a row the last time we had a GM search. The circumstances are very different.

If you are saying another candidate wouldn't want the job because Duquette was treated poorly here or wasn't given free reign to do his job, then I disagree vehemently with that. I'm sure most GM's would love to have their deal ripped up and be given a six year deal one year after signing a three-year contract. And Duquette was given a ton of latitude to run the front office as he's seen fit.

I think you are wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't really see the relevance. We've been to the playoffs two of the last four years. We had 14 straight losing seasons and had been under 70 wins something like 5 years in a row the last time we had a GM search. The circumstances are very different.

If you are saying another candidate wouldn't want the job because Duquette was treated poorly here or wasn't given free reign to do his job, then I disagree vehemently with that. I'm sure most GM's would love to have their deal ripped up and be given a six year deal one year after signing a three-year contract. And Duquette was given a ton of latitude to run the front office as he's seen fit.

A strong post from my vantage. The past is past. No need to relive in every negative way at every chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He was allowed the latitude and rebuilt his prestige to the point that he was an executive of the year finalist two out of three years and a winner so that he became a tampering target. At a level that there is no precedence of compensation or gentlemans agreement because in his organization he was the top baseball operations executive. There were no higher jobs that he was blocked from. All after being blackballed by the same boys club and press camaraderie now wishes to shame him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On which point? Both?

From a talent perspective Baltimore was a very enticing job last time around. The industry perception of the job is what kept folks away. I don't think it's a lack of talent or payroll that would keep a would-be GM away. I think it's the same crap that would arguably keep GMs from wanting to jump between Moreno and Scioscia.

The idea that the organization will not give you the latitude to pursue better opportunities is a bigger deal for the guys lower on the food chain, since GMs don't have many opportunities for a "bump". But it's enough of a concern that you notice when an organization is perceived as obstructionist.

Maybe none of it matters. Maybe it does. I hear the same complaints about the Orioles from scouts, same statements folks wouldn't take a promotion in Baltimore. Winning seasons don't erase the issues with which people are concerned when pursuing potential employment gigs. That's all I meant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From a talent perspective Baltimore was a very enticing job last time around. The industry perception of the job is what kept folks away. I don't think it's a lack of talent or payroll that would keep a would-be GM away. I think it's the same crap that would arguably keep GMs from wanting to jump between Moreno and Scioscia.

The idea that the organization will not give you the latitude to pursue better opportunities is a bigger deal for the guys lower on the food chain, since GMs don't have many opportunities for a "bump". But it's enough of a concern that you notice when an organization is perceived as obstructionist.

Maybe none of it matters. Maybe it does. I hear the same complaints about the Orioles from scouts, same statements folks wouldn't take a promotion in Baltimore. Winning seasons don't erase the issues with which people are concerned when pursuing potential employment gigs. That's all I meant.

Which response would you hope your employer would have:

"Given the person that Mark is, the significant leadership and values that he has brought to the organization and with everything he has helped us accomplish, it will be extremely difficult to see him leave," owner Paul Dolan said in a statement on the blog. "However, I hope that this new challenge brings happiness and fulfillment for Mark and his family."

As far as no bump, maybe. But Shapiro sees something unique in the position being offered:

While weighing those bonds carefully and seriously, I feel the unique and compelling nature of the Blue Jays President/CEO position warranted my consideration. This position represents a unique opportunity for me and one that I felt was the right new challenge to undertake. With mixed emotions, I will assume the Toronto Blue Jays CEO position upon the conclusion of the 2015 season.

Indians received no compensation.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2558495-mark-shapiro-to-blue-jays-latest-contract-details-comments-and-reaction

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing about Angelos (and the Nationals are finding it out now), is when you negotiate a deal with him, he will hold you to it..100%.

I also think the fact that this was not like say the Rockies or something, but one of our most hated division rivals right as the Winter Meetings started makes it much worse. Toronto did not even hire a new President after being turned away for over 6 months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The thing about Angelos (and the Nationals are finding it out now), is when you negotiate a deal with him, he will hold you to it..100%.

I also think the fact that this was not like say the Rockies or something, but one of our most hated division rivals right as the Winter Meetings started makes it much worse. Toronto did not even hire a new President after being turned away for over 6 months.

how will Angelos treatment of DD impact the Orioles ability to hire his replacement? Or will low risk(cost) high reward govern hiring the VP of Baseball operations
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From a talent perspective Baltimore was a very enticing job last time around. The industry perception of the job is what kept folks away. I don't think it's a lack of talent or payroll that would keep a would-be GM away. I think it's the same crap that would arguably keep GMs from wanting to jump between Moreno and Scioscia.

The idea that the organization will not give you the latitude to pursue better opportunities is a bigger deal for the guys lower on the food chain, since GMs don't have many opportunities for a "bump". But it's enough of a concern that you notice when an organization is perceived as obstructionist.

Maybe none of it matters. Maybe it does. I hear the same complaints about the Orioles from scouts, same statements folks wouldn't take a promotion in Baltimore. Winning seasons don't erase the issues with which people are concerned when pursuing potential employment gigs. That's all I meant.

It's simple. If you want to work in Baltimore, don't accept a six year contract. Get a shorter one with less personal security. Besides, Klentak was given the opportunity to leave. As was Joe Jordan. Scott Profrock, Kevin Malone. Heck. Even Larry Luccino!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...