Jump to content

Dan Duquette: Os to Be Active in Trade Market


weams

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 407
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Yet you constantly attack me because I actually care about the outcomes of games. If it were possible to display hypocrisy as a work of art in a museum, this would be the Mona Lisa.

This insinuates that other posters do not care about the outcome of Orioles games, which is absurd.

Whenever the Orioles have even a modest winning streak, or even if they win just a single game, the "Everybody's Dancin' Now" thread get bumped by numerous posters, as does the "The Orioles are in First Place" thread.

You don't get "attacked" for speaking your mind, you get called to task for making outrageous assertions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would probably check in with the Cubs about Wieters and see if they are interested. They really need an upgrade at catcher.

They just promoted the best catching prospect in baseball, they'll be just fine. Ross has been great by the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They just promoted the best catching prospect in baseball, they'll be just fine. Ross has been great by the way.

Ross has been a backup. He's almost 40 he's not playing every day. It remains to be seen if the kid they brought up can manage the staff or hit ML pitching. He may be great in the future, but right now it's a position of weakness for them.

Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ross has been a backup. He's almost 40 he's not playing every day. It remains to be seen if the kid they brought up can manage the staff or hit ML pitching. He may be great in the future, but right now it's a position of weakness for them.

Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk

Although not their best position, they've produced .8fWAR out of the catcher position so far which is 13th in baseball. A dominant lefty reliever is the real need. Rondon and Strop are awesome, Grimm usually is. Warren has disappointed and the Cahill/Richard combo is just bad. If they make a move beyond that, I'd expect an expiring OF bat. Joy Bautista name has emerged a lot in rumors if the Blue Jays sell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do sometimes post against my better judgment and probably come across as condescending, especially to those who I think defend unsubstantiated (or -able) positions too vehemently. I also say many things in jest that are taken the wrong way. We all have our failings.
As do, every other poster in OH, :):):)

I have no failings that I know of. I'm totally awesome! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Although not their best position, they've produced .8fWAR out of the catcher position so far which is 13th in baseball. A dominant lefty reliever is the real need. Rondon and Strop are awesome, Grimm usually is. Warren has disappointed and the Cahill/Richard combo is just bad. If they make a move beyond that, I'd expect an expiring OF bat. Joy Bautista name has emerged a lot in rumors if the Blue Jays sell.

What do you think they'll give up to get Miller?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would probably check in with the Cubs about Wieters and see if they are interested. They really need an upgrade at catcher.

Not with the uncertainty with Joseph. He wasn't hitting before this injury. If he comes back, it could turn into a black hole in the lineup

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jesus, I just read five pages of nothing. Nothing related to the topic at hand. I have a question that I would have thought would be addressed - who will replace Trumbo if traded? Do we have a glut of OF's that can even marginally approach replace his numbers thus helping us THIS year?

Give me some meat to chew on - why should I believe trading Trumbo is in the best interests of the team if we're serious about winning THIS year? Doesn't make a whole lot of sense but I'm willing to listen to anyone willing to stay on topic. As for Schoop - my first thought is that you cannot be serious but I'm listening. Anyone?

Yeah, I don't see the depth at 2B or OF that would suggest we should trade Trumbo OR Schoop without expecting a serious drop-off in production at that position. Heck, Wieters, too. The only position I see real depth is the bullpen, but Britton is probably the only "Andrew-Miller-level" reliever that might net real value. Sure, ya gotta give up somethin' to get somethin', but it would be nice to at least have a serviceable starter in mind to take the place of Trumbo/Schoop/Wieters before we trade any of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...