Jump to content

Trying to understand the current waiver issue


Skipjack33

Recommended Posts

I read an article yesterday about the Yankees blocking the Orioles from making possible waiver deals. The basic premise was that Duquette was working the phones but couldn't make an addition because of the Yankees chicanery. Then tonight, I read a story of the Indians acquiring Crisp from the A's. The Indians, obviously, have a better record than the Orioles but Yankees waiver claims are not having the same effect. I can only assume that the Orioles could add players, but are choosing not to do so for budgetary or other reasons. I am wondering if others can provide some insight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read an article yesterday about the Yankees blocking the Orioles from making possible waiver deals. The basic premise was that Duquette was working the phones but couldn't make an addition because of the Yankees chicanery. Then tonight, I read a story of the Indians acquiring Crisp from the A's. The Indians, obviously, have a better record than the Orioles but Yankees waiver claims are not having the same effect. I can only assume that the Orioles could add players, but are choosing not to do so for budgetary or other reasons. I am wondering if others can provide some insight.

I think they are blocking any pitching available as they need that as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read an article yesterday about the Yankees blocking the Orioles from making possible waiver deals. The basic premise was that Duquette was working the phones but couldn't make an addition because of the Yankees chicanery. Then tonight, I read a story of the Indians acquiring Crisp from the A's. The Indians, obviously, have a better record than the Orioles but Yankees waiver claims are not having the same effect. I can only assume that the Orioles could add players, but are choosing not to do so for budgetary or other reasons. I am wondering if others can provide some insight.

Coco Crisp has an OPS of .698 makes a lot of money and has a 750k buyout next season. The reason they can trade him is because if the Yankees claims him the A's could say he is yours and the Yankees would stuck with his salary. I assume the players the Yankees are claiming are decent players are decent salaries. Guys they would actually want on their team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw the story, too, and I think it was a lot of hyperbole. There are no shortage of players who have made it through waivers that the Orioles could use. Maybe the Yanks have claimed a few bullpen arms that the O's would have liked, but that's their prerogative. They're not just stopping the O's in that regard - they're stopping literally every other team in the WC race that's lower than them on the Waiver totem pole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Coco Crisp has an OPS of .698 makes a lot of money and has a 750k buyout next season. The reason they can trade him is because if the Yankees claims him the A's could say he is yours and the Yankees would stuck with his salary. I assume the players the Yankees are claiming are decent players are decent salaries. Guys they would actually want on their team.
Read this. There is no hyperbole to the blocking tale.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Awesome research, thanks. I was a fan in 1974 but had forgotten that string of five shutouts.  This last two weeks of rotation excellence (and your list) is giving me flashbacks to the summer of love (1967), when I started to make game logs to savor the strings of shutouts and low-hit gems by Oriole starters. Looking back now at the game logs kept by Baseball-Reference (manually, without your sorting skills!), it's hard to identify exactly which streak so impressed my teenage fan-meter, or even which year. Certainly 1968 was all about low scoring league-wide.  Maybe it was the stretch 22-27 May 1967 featuring Phoebus, Bertaina, Barber, McNally, and Phoebus again (good old 4-man rotation!), including three scoreless outings. Or Hardin and Brabender joining Phoebus, McNally and Palmer from 15 to 20 September, 1967. What about 1969, with Cuellar, Lopez and Leonhard joining the previous cast of McNally, Phoebus, and Hardin, twirling 10 starts (13-22 June) while allowing only 12 runs.  Anyway, it feels rather historic to see this run of high-end pitching from an Orioles rotation. Here's a chart to recap the numbers on this streak in progress... Date Starter IP H ER ERA (14 G) totals: 81.67 59 19 2.09 21-Apr Irvin 6.2 4 0   22-Apr Suarez 5.2 4 0   23-Apr Rodriguez 4.1 11 7   24-Apr Kremer 5.1 3 2   26-Apr Burnes 6 3 1   27-Apr Irvin 7 4 0   28-Apr Suarez 4 7 4   29-Apr Rodriguez 5.2 5 0   30-Apr Kremer 7 4 2   1-May Burnes 6 4 2   2-May Bradish 4.2 4 1   3-May Irvin 6.1 2 0   4-May Means 7 3 0   5-May Kremer 6 1 0  
    • Somehow feels typical of Orioles to play up to the competition, and get burned by the pretenders... same with individual starting pitchers. 
    • It was very obvious ...he would also take a look at his hand frequently. On Saturday, watching a clip in the dugout after one of the HR's, Kremer went to give a high five, pulled back and took a look at his hand. I thought it strange, and I thought something was off. He always appeared to be one of the more enthusiastic celebrators. It would seem the coaches would notice and probably did, but thought nothing of it. Certainly didn't affect his game.
    • Umpire really tried to screw us on Saturday.     
    • I heard someone call it The Great American Smallpark.
    • I just looked thru their record a while ago.  Series against the Nats (2), White Sox, Marlins, Cardinals, Rockies and Angels makes their record of 1 win better than the O's way less impressive.  Their schedule coming up must be hell.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...