Jump to content

Orioles Officially sign Catcher Welington Castillo


Machado13

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, crawjo said:

But don't you see that getting Castillo or Wieters would require at least a three-year deal? And that this would block Sisco? I think they should just sign somebody off the scrap heap. Somebody who is a good pitch framer and let him share the job with Joseph until Sisco is ready. 

If you signed Castillo to three years and Sisco proves ready to the primary catcher in 2018, couldn't you trade him?  Isn't Castillo a good insurance policy if they have to move Sisco to the OF like Jayson Werth?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 475
  • Created
  • Last Reply
7 hours ago, Roll Tide said:

My problem is the team obviously has limited resources unlike some of our division foes.

If moves aren't made to extend our star players early it will be difficult to control the payroll. If we don't trade guys like Manny and Britton that it is very unlikely we extend, under the new system we getting little to nothing in return.

You can't replace Machado's value with a 3-5th round pick.

 

Of course we don't want to lose Manny for only a draft pick, but you are mistaken in thinking it would be a 3-5 rounder.  The team losing a QO FA under the new CBA receives a compensation pick after the first round, just like before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Number5 said:

Of course we don't want to lose Manny for only a draft pick, but you are mistaken in thinking it would be a 3-5 rounder.  The team losing a QO FA under the new CBA receives a compensation pick after the first round, just like before.

Okay....even then...could you replace many with a pick in the 30s?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2016/12/orioles-to-sign-welington-castillo.html

 

Quote

While recent reports had downplayed the possibility, the Orioles have reached agreement on a one-year deal with free-agent backstop Welington Castillo, per Jon Heyman of Fan Rag (Twitter links). There’s a second-year player option included in the pact, effectively giving Castillo some downside protection with the ability to re-enter the market next winter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
    • What if they don’t want to be extended?
    • I don't want the O's to lose much, but I do want there to be a massive streaming deal with Amazon or some other company the O's are left out of.  This blackout nonsense is bullsh!t. 🤬
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...