Jump to content

Napoli on the Radar


weams

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Frobby said:

There's risk either way.  I worry that at age 36, Napoli could fall off a cliff at any moment.   

This.

...which is why I like Pedro Alvarez (30), Chris Carter (30), Michael Saunders (30), and even Brandon Moss (33) better as candidates.  I won't cry over Napoli like I won't cry over a re-sign of Trumbo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 97
  • Created
  • Last Reply
23 minutes ago, 25 Nuggets said:

This.

...which is why I like Pedro Alvarez (30), Chris Carter (30), Michael Saunders (30), and even Brandon Moss (33) better as candidates.  I won't cry over Napoli like I won't cry over a re-sign of Trumbo.

I am still concerned about the failed physical, and very concerned if the Orioles go against what their DRs. advise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Hank Scorpio said:

Davis in a vacuum is fine.... problem is, he's one of the best we've got @ getting on base.

'96 - 257 homers, 949 runs

'16 - 253 homers, 744 runs

Yikers.

Wow can't believe those figures. I guess so many of 96's power hitters were also good at getting other types of base hits and walks: Brady, Alomar, Surhoff, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LA2 said:

Wow can't believe those figures. I guess so many of 96's power hitters were also good at getting other types of base hits and walks: Brady, Alomar, Surhoff, etc.

Different offensive environment.

Pitchers have, on the average, much higher K rates and lower walk rates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Hank Scorpio said:

Davis in a vacuum is fine.... problem is, he's one of the best we've got @ getting on base.

'96 - 257 homers, 949 runs

'16 - 253 homers, 744 runs

Yikers.

The game has changed since then.   The whole league scored about 19% more runs in '96 than in '16.     But even adjusting for context, there's little doubt that the '96 team had a considerably better offense than the '16 team.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, weams said:

I am still concerned about the failed physical, and very concerned if the Orioles go against what their DRs. advise. 

From what we know, the Orioles haven't ruled out Saunders on a 1 yr deal, but won't give him the 3 yr deal he seeks.  Which is fine considering the failed physical.

Unlike Gallardo, there is no pick attached.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, dan-O said:

More accurately, two position players. Because we've given Gausman, Bundy, Britton, Givens, etc a shot. Joseph also has a near-permanent 25-man roster spot on the bench. 

And if it makes you feel better, we've compensated by giving hacks like Mike Wright far more of an opportunity than they deserve. Mancini is probably good, but probably not very good. He also has no track record, while Napoli does. I agree that guys like Alvarez have kind of been given the shaft but unless they are standout talents, the Orioles have used homegrown position players as injury reserve guys or trade bait, and to pretty good effect.

I said everyday players for a reason.   Pitchers don't play every day.  I agree that every pitcher with a pulse has had their chances.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...