Jump to content

That Loss Was On Buck but Wilson must go


Rene88

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Aristotelian said:

Tie game on the road is a classic long man situation because you can't use your closer and you don't know if/when your team will score.

Disagree. Maybe in extra innings. Usually one inning pitchers are used until you run out of them. 

Long man is there to relieve a starter who was knocked out early or pitch in a blowout. Not a tie game in the 9th 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply
4 minutes ago, Rene88 said:

And I bet you rationalized not using Britton in the WC too? Just curious. We all love Buck but certain fans will defend him at all costs. 

Sorry, I just don't agree with your assessment. Accepting losing "is annoying", particularly when it's the Blue Jays! 

You got to put the dagger in, they were 1-9.

Yes, the dagger move would be to score and then bring in Brach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

If Brach pitches the 9th then who pitches? You have to score still to win. This wasn't a playoff game.  

He uses the save rule as a leverage index in my opinion. He wants his best out there in 3 run games.  

Whomever is next in line.  If that's Wilson then it is Wilson.  You hold the opposition down as long as you can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Rene88 said:

And I bet you rationalized not using Britton in the WC too? Just curious. We all love Buck but certain fans will defend him at all costs. 

Sorry, I just don't agree with your assessment. Accepting losing "is annoying", particularly when it's the Blue Jays! 

You got to put the dagger in, they were 1-9.

Gnat trolls should be seen little and heard less. Go second guess Dusty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Aristotelian said:

The only guy besides Brach was Nuno. I do not believe he is any more proficient than Wilson. Regardless of the save rule, you need the best combination to pitch at least two, possibly more innings. Brach might get you through one but then you still need to get another, and maybe even more than that. You cannot burn Wilson and Brach there, period.

 

I think we haven't seen much of Nuno because he has had bad match ups. A lefty vs Boston in Fenway and vs the Jays isn't exactly a good combo.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eddie83 said:

Disagree. Maybe in extra innings. Usually one inning pitchers are used until you run out of them. 

Long man is there to relieve a starter who was knocked out early or pitch in a blowout. Not a tie game in the 9th 

Yeah, we ran out of them. Brach was only going to come into the game to close. He had just pitched two nights in a row. Your choices are Wilson and Nuno and you stick with Wilson because he is already in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Whomever is next in line.  If that's Wilson then it is Wilson.  You hold the opposition down as long as you can.

You still have to score. What the hell is the difference if the Jays score in the 9th or 10th. You act like Brach hasn't pitched in 5 days.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aristotelian said:

Yeah, we ran out of them. Brach was only going to come into the game to close. He had just pitched two nights in a row. Your choices are Wilson and Nuno and you stick with Wilson because he is already in the game.

Right, I agree. My point is that in usual or big game circumstances they aren't pitching Wilson there that is all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

If Brach pitches the 9th then who pitches? You have to score still to win. This wasn't a playoff game.  

He uses the save rule as a leverage index in my opinion. He wants his best out there in 3 run games.  

He didn't want to use Brach at all. He'd only use to protect a lead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Crazysilver03 said:

It's a sport where the best teams still lose 62 games.

Appreciate you trying to be civil. I hear ya, but this game was winnable, very winnable. Momentum was on our side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, eddie83 said:

You still have to score. What the hell is the difference if the Jays score in the 9th or 10th. You act like Brach hasn't pitched in 5 days.  

Well they certainly are not going to score in the 10th if the Jays walk it off in the 9th.

I understand that they might not win regardless of how the relievers were used.

Maybe Buck uses Brach and he gives up the HR.

But the proper process is to pitch the best guys you have available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Can_of_corn said:

Well they certainly are not going to score in the 10th if the Jays walk it off in the 9th.

I understand that they might not win regardless of how the relievers were used.

Maybe Buck uses Brach and he gives up the HR.

But the proper process is to pitch the best guys you have available.

In a playoff game I agree. This was game 10. Either way Tyler Wilson was pitching in this game. Once again Givens today is a separate issue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...