Jump to content

Long Man Tonight?


Bahama O's Fan

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Yep.  However, history, for whatever reason, shows Ubaldo having success against the Reds and in that ballpark.    He still walked 4 guys.   I have very little confidence going forward, although he's certainly capable of putting a good string of starts together.

You never know from one game to the next which Ubaldo will show up.   But at least now we know that the one who is capable of throwing a good game still exists.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Want to re-think that one?

Haha, yes I do. This is probably part of what makes Ubaldo so frustrating to me personally. He has a gem every now and again to make you believe he is gonna go on one of his dominant stretches and then next outing he reminds you why you hated watching him pitch in the first place. So now, if only for a little bit, I will not cringe when I see he is pitching. How long will that last? One start at a time but I'm not holding my breath that that performance will be the new norm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Yep.  However, history, for whatever reason, shows Ubaldo having success against the Reds and in that ballpark.    He still walked 4 guys.   I have very little confidence going forward, although he's certainly capable of putting a good string of starts together.

When he got to 2-0 on Votto, I told the Reds fan next to me that Ubaldo would give up a walk and homer. Sure enough he walked Votto on 3-1, and then Duvall crushed one to straightaway center that looked to be going out. Fortunately AJ got a good jump and caught it on the warning track in the deepest part of the park. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...