Jump to content

If we are playoff bound, we still need one more starting pitcher


ScGO's

Recommended Posts

Honestly, I'm starting to see a lot of similarities to the 2012 team. 

In 2012, we got off to a hot start and then regressed to the strength of the starting pitching. To start August, I think we were 4 games over .500 but had been playing bad baseball. Then DD and Buck rebuilt the rotation on the fly and added Mclouth and Machado. Both of whom were about league average but improvements. Machado provided a spark. 

In 2017, we got off to a hot start and regressed to the strength of the starting pitching. To start August we were 3 games under .500 and had been playing bad baseball. We add Hellickson and move Tillman to the pen. Add Beckham, who looks like he adds a spark and will be at worst a league average shortstop. But will be an improvement. 

We all know how 2012 ended. The schedule for August is prime for a similar run. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 127
  • Created
  • Last Reply

We are getting in. We have a playoff offense, defense, and bullpen. Tillman won't hurt us anymore and come September we can yank starters who struggle and toss a bunch of relievers at teams. The pitcher and shortstop we picked up are upgrades. Hardy is getting Wally Pipped. Why be so negative about our chances? We are not the team that had 14 crappy seasons.  We may not get far, but we are certainly getting in.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, ScGO's said:

Need to make a waiver claim or trade soon because we still don't have the starting pitching depth needed to make a playoff push. Bundy is still tired, we can't bank on Miley or Jiminez yet, and Tillman is done. My two targets are Dicky and Miggy. Would LOVE to get Verlander, but not sure how to do it with that salary.  Thoughts? Plans? 

If we get a starter and Dan calls up Hays and/or Santander for OF depth, we might be able to snag one of these WC spots.

Is there anyone down in the farm that can help us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mdbdotcom said:

Not at all. I didn't understand why the score was posted in the first place. I just responded.

To bring attention to the fact that KC was losing the first game of a double header and that the O's are very much in the playoff race whether we play KC again or not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

o

 

I'm sittin' in the parking station, got a ticket to the stadium ...... Hmmmmmm ......
 

On a tour of road-trip stands, my Rally Monkey in my hand. And every game is neatly planned for an O's fan and a winning roadstand.
 

Playoff bound ...... I wish I was ...... playoff bound.

 

 

 

 

 

At Fenway Park

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, survivedc said:

Which is where the score stayed in the KC loss. Gotta be honest, not sure where you're coming from. It seems like you're rooting for the teams ahead of the O's to prove a point.

You realize the Mariners are also ahead of the O's?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ScGO's said:

To bring attention to the fact that KC was losing the first game of a double header and that the O's are very much in the playoff race whether we play KC again or not

I never said we weren't in it, I just pointed out that as long as the Royals are in front of us we do not control our own destiny because we don't play them again. I don't know why that seems to be so difficult for people to understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...