Jump to content

So was Duquette right?


vab

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, wildcard said:

Bobby will help him get better.  It will take some time.   He has helped all the infielders.

You say that as if the Rays don't have a coach who works with the infielders. Tom Foley, the bench/infield coach, works with all the infielders to make them better. He has worked with Longoria since he joined the organization and continues to help him get better.

I'm sure Bobby Dickerson does a great job, but I doubt that he has any magic dust that helps a guy with concentration problems keep his head in the game. While focus is something a player might be able to improve on their own, I don't think it's a teachable skill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply
17 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

You say that as if the Rays don't have a coach who works with the infielders. Tom Foley, the bench/infield coach, works with all the infielders to make them better. He has worked with Longoria since he joined the organization and continues to help him get better.

I'm sure Bobby Dickerson does a great job, but I doubt that he has any magic dust that helps a guy with concentration problems keep his head in the game. While focus is something a player might be able to improve on their own, I don't think it's a teachable skill.

I guess we will see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, esmd said:

Eh, if they get the 2nd WC he is somewhat redeemed, but you could make the argument he kicked the can down the road and still has numerous problems on the horizon after next year.  If they make a deep playoff run, he would earn a lot of credit.  Still not sure I see that happening though.

Somewhat? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, wildcard said:

Bobby will help him get better.  It will take some time.   He has helped all the infielders.

Perhaps, but from what I heard, it was Denny Hocking who was the biggest influence on Manny and Schoop coming up. Wasn't a Buck guy so he was sent packing but Dickerson is so he gets the credit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, SteveA said:

No, didn't say that.   Just pointing out that these deals aren't always sure things and they don't necessarily make you good in the future.

To me, the best way to be good in the future is to draft well, scout well, make good international signings, don't make stupid deals like trading Davies.   We don't do a lot of those things, unfortunately.   But that's how you do it.

If you do that you should go into most seasons hoping to contend, and then punting a season on July 31 should only be a last resort if everything has gone wrong.   Not a planned strategy like some people around here see it.    It's like the ejector seat for a fighter pilot... you use it when necessary but you don't plan your missions around its use.

That's why I was asking, I wasn't being sarcastic I don't know who philly got back & one great starter is incredibly hard to find. We haven't had one consistent starter all year and we're in it. 

I agree with all of that. That's a great post. I agree that you should give your guys the 6 months you brought them in to play if you've got a reasonable chance at the postseason in the end of July. Guys get inexplicably hot and it only takes one hit bat to win a series sometimes.

I think we could have traded away ZB & BB and been fine but I wouldn't move either for what it sounds like we were offered. 

What a week it's been!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...