Jump to content

To Bunt or not to Bunt


Catch 8

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 40
  • Created
  • Last Reply
4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

It's nice having both so we can pinch hit for one and still have a good defensive OF in reserve.   I do like Gentry better overall.  

I'd argue that neither is a good defensive OF, they are decent defensive OFs, that just look good compared to Trumbo, Mancini, and Smith.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, weams said:

 

By the way, Gentry got hurt bunting. 

 

o

 

Wade Miley got hurt pitching 4 months ago, with 2 line drives right back to the mound hitting him in the same inning.

He's still pitching, in spite of that experience.

If getting injured while trying to perform a routine procedure was necessarily a good reason to stop doing it, nobody would be playing baseball anymore.

 

You could make arguments as to whether or not bunting in general is in the overall best interest of the team, but somebody getting injured while doing it would not be part of either side of those arguments.

 

o

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chris Davis could be a .400 hitter if he'd just take the bunt offered to him every single at bat.

 

Instead he would rather be a big nothingburger except for the rare occasion he actually runs into one every week or so.

He'd rather move himself up the home run leaderboard than avoid because the answer to this trivia question:

Which player in major league history who signed a 100 million + deal had the worst total WAR in the history of the game.

There is zero chance this doesn't end up being Chris Davis if he doesn't change his approach because he is a total nightmare at the plate and he seems like he couldnt care less.

Anyone who actually gave a crap would stop striking out twice a game and instead get on base, especially during a playoff stretch run.

By year 6 he's gonna become the most loathed Orioles in history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Norfolk orioles said:

I think he is bunting against a wide open side of the field.

 

Just push it out there and it's a base hit.

 

even 4/10 and he's going to force defenses to change.

I don't think Davis can bunt ML pitching and get base hits 4 out of 10 times.

Keep in mind he isn't fast down the line (earlier this year he was one of the slowest).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I don't think Davis can bunt ML pitching and get base hits 4 out of 10 times.

Keep in mind he isn't fast down the line (earlier this year he was one of the slowest).

I just think he could pick some spots here and there to try it.  

He did it one time in a one run game in the 9th which made no sense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Norfolk orioles said:

Chris Davis could be a .400 hitter if he'd just take the bunt offered to him every single at bat.

 

Instead he would rather be a big nothingburger except for the rare occasion he actually runs into one every week or so.

He'd rather move himself up the home run leaderboard than avoid because the answer to this trivia question:

Which player in major league history who signed a 100 million + deal had the worst total WAR in the history of the game.

There is zero chance this doesn't end up being Chris Davis if he doesn't change his approach because he is a total nightmare at the plate and he seems like he couldnt care less.

Anyone who actually gave a crap would stop striking out twice a game and instead get on base, especially during a playoff stretch run.

By year 6 he's gonna become the most loathed Orioles in history.

I hear you but he doesn't even have to bunt. He could simply look to hit the ball the other way like he did in 2013. All that space due to the shift and yet, he usually tries to pull everything or stares at pitches down the middle. I'm rooting for him like all O's, but don't expect much in the change of his approach.

In a interview with masn about a month ago, he essentially said he was unlucky this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...