Jump to content

Will the Orioles have three new starters from outside the organization next season?


Diehard_O's_Fan

Recommended Posts

I've really wanted to trade Britton for a starter.  Maybe we can finally do that.  There will be enough money to get one decent starter.  I'd love to swap Trumbo for a #5 starter type.  I think some of the money coming off the books goes to Schoop.... so, hey, if they really have no hope of signing Manny, move him for all the arms you can get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply
14 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

Its crazy to talk of trading Gausman.  The O's only have 2 ML starters signed for next year-Bundy and Gausman.  If the O's trade Gausman they need 4 ML starters not 3.  Gausman has the potential to be a good #2 and frequently shows flashes of that ability.  Do you want to fill out the rotation w/ 4 Mileys or Hellicksons? 

I would hope the O's sign at least 1 above average starter this offseason.  I'm tired of the O's dumpster diving for starters and ending up w/ pitchers like Miley, Hellickson and Ubaldo.  If the O's had 3 above average starter this season, they would probably be right on Boston's heels for the division and have the wild card sewn up.

Well that dumpster diver will be around till 2018. I am so ready for DD and Buck to say adios. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Black Bat said:

I don't think it's unfeasible (word?) to see the Orioles take a different direction seeing that the dumpster diving nets very little in return.  They are very aware of spending too much on SP's that can go flat but at the same time there are numerous recent examples of TOR FA's elevating a staff.  Maybe now is the time to add such an arm to lead a young staff in preparation and execution.  It might be a less risky proposition than spending several 10-17M contracts on mediocre pitchers.  PA can't be thrilled with the results the past 3-5 years with these re-treads.

Lord knows they clear a lot of salary when Miley, Hellickson, Ubaldo and Tillman depart.  Maybe another approach is not sign a pricey SP at all.  Now is the time and work with the prospects moving up next season.  Throw in Castro and a few AAA arms and work toward moving Jones, Davis and Trumbo at any cost.  Davis is likely impossible, I know. 

I know this isn't a popular direction but you could save a few bucks toward extending Manny, Schoop and perhaps Beckham.  I just don't see a bright future with the continued Band-Aid approach keeping these aging unproductive players in the fold.  

It's infeasible.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, joelala said:

I think we'll bring back either Miley or Hellickson. 

I expect them to bring back Tillman and hope for a rebound and Hellickson on the cheap. I do expect them to cut ties with Miley and Jimenez. They just aren't giving up on Gausman. He if they do all of this and add a new LH starter I think it's a lot by their standards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

I expect them to bring back Tillman and hope for a rebound and Hellickson on the cheap. I do expect them to cut ties with Miley and Jimenez. They just aren't giving up on Gausman. He if they do all of this and add a new LH starter I think it's a lot by their standards.

I don't know why they would bring Hellickson back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the Os team construct as it is for 2018 right now, we would have to take the payroll into the $170M range if we actually picked up a 2 WAR type of pitcher.  That is crazy numbers IMO - a waste of a payroll on a possible .500 team.  We would have to keep Trumbo, Davis, Britton, Manny and others. 

I would not trade Gausman.  Too much upside. 

Our 4/5 pitchers are going to be $1M-$5M guys just like this year. 

Other options open up if we can deal Manny, Britton, Trumbo, Davis or others - which I don't see happening.  The best way to get a 2 WAR pitcher for next year would probably involve swapping Hays for an equivalent pitcher. 

I'd prefer to see us deal both Manny and Britton and go young next year with Hays, Mullins and others plus the haul from Manny and ZB - which might make us more competitive than some think.  Especially since we would have $ to go sign a couple SPs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Black Bat said:

I don't think it's unfeasible (word?) to see the Orioles take a different direction seeing that the dumpster diving nets very little in return.  They are very aware of spending too much on SP's that can go flat but at the same time there are numerous recent examples of TOR FA's elevating a staff.  Maybe now is the time to add such an arm to lead a young staff in preparation and execution.  It might be a less risky proposition than spending several 10-17M contracts on mediocre pitchers.  PA can't be thrilled with the results the past 3-5 years with these re-treads.

 

It's not incomprehensible....

And no it's not. Whether they do or not....well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, hoosiers said:

In the Os team construct as it is for 2018 right now, we would have to take the payroll into the $170M range if we actually picked up a 2 WAR type of pitcher.  That is crazy numbers IMO - a waste of a payroll on a possible .500 team.  We would have to keep Trumbo, Davis, Britton, Manny and others. 

I would not trade Gausman.  Too much upside. 

Our 4/5 pitchers are going to be $1M-$5M guys just like this year. 

Other options open up if we can deal Manny, Britton, Trumbo, Davis or others - which I don't see happening.  The best way to get a 2 WAR pitcher for next year would probably involve swapping Hays for an equivalent pitcher. 

I'd prefer to see us deal both Manny and Britton and go young next year with Hays, Mullins and others plus the haul from Manny and ZB - which might make us more competitive than some think.  Especially since we would have $ to go sign a couple SPs. 

I think Mullins needs to start next year at AAA.  He slumped pretty badly toward the end of the AA season.

170m is right where the O's are right now.   They probably have the offense, defense and pen to be a much better team.  They need to upgrade the starters and they are a playoff team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildcard said:

I think Mullins needs to start next year at AAA.  He slumped pretty badly toward the end of the AA season.

170m is right where the O's are right now.   They probably have the offense, defense and pen to be a much better team.  They need to upgrade the starters and they are a playoff team.

Other than Manny I'm not impressed by the defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

Other than Manny I'm not impressed by the defense. 

Rickard has done a good job in RF and is +10 DRS in the OF this year. Surprisingly, Mancini has been above average in LF (+3)  compared to 1B. Although, I'm not sure he was ever considered above average at 1B.

Two straight seasons well below average for Jones. Maybe time for that move to RF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

Rickard has done a good job in RF and is +10 DRS in the OF this year. Surprisingly, Mancini has been above average in LF (+3)  compared to 1B. Although, I'm not sure he was ever considered above average at 1B.

Two straight seasons well below average for Jones. Maybe time for that move to RF.

I have a hard time with the idea that Mancini is above average in the outfield.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I honestly think there is very little difference in most the teams that made the playoffs.  The most wins was 98 wins and there was 12 teams with 86 wins or more.  It also seems that many of the teams are on the same page with scouting and analytics now hitting wise.  Years back you had moneyball which the A’s used before anyone else.  Then the Astros and few teams started with analytics and seemed to be ahead of the rest of the league but they have caught up now imo.  Now the move seems to be on launch angle and hitting homers by getting the ball in the air but that seems to be across the league.  Obviously some teams have more money and more talented players but the strategy seems about the same.  The main differences I see is in pitching in the playoffs which is bullpen games and using openers rather then a starter to go 7 innings and carry your team to win now a slight sign of trouble they are taking them out.  With all these short inning guys and pitching them in certain pockets we are seeing very little offense and the hitting with runners in scoring position has been awful.  It all comes down to RISP at bats and getting 1 or 2 big base hits in those situations.  We just haven’t been able to get those hits so far in short series.  
    • And we've seen similar with Kjerstad. Kjerstad might be the best pure hitting prospect in the Orioles system of recent years besides Gunnar. I want to see him playing everyday next year is possible none of this sitting him versus LHP more often than not. These prospects need to get their reps and stop treating them like John Lowenstein and Benny Ayala.
    • I don’t see Elias trading off prospects anymore at least top guys.  We have moved a few guys in last year and I expect they try to build that back up.  They should have money to use if they want to add talent.  
    • Blah, well Rob Manfred has to be happy along with Fox network. A Yankees-Mets World Series match up is still on the table and the Dodgers as well if they win tomorrow. I knew the Royals would get jettisoned by the Yankees without too much of a fight.
    • For Mountcastle …Maybe Chase Petty and Tristan Smith?
    • I’m guessing they ask for Mayo or Basallo of Kjerstad. For me …I’d give them Kjerstad since he’s defensively challenged IMO. Maybe Kjerstad, McDermott, Beavers, and O’Ferrall? 
    • 192 wins in two seasons is a pretty strong argument to stay the course.  That said, I wonder if the young players wouldn't be better off long-term if the scientific matchups took a back seat to the raw talent a little more than we've seen.  Overthinking something can be a thing you know.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...