Jump to content

Extend Dan and Buck... Now


Bradysburns

Recommended Posts

16 hours ago, clapdiddy said:

I think I'm ready for a change in manager.   I wouldn't be upset with Buck, but I think we need a change.  

What scares the heck out of me, is getting somebody worse.

Buck is far from perfect, but pretty good.

Too many castoffs managers out there, they say, it takes most managers 2 or 3 firings for them to really learn the job and perform it well.

We had a few of managers come through here before Buck, that made me cringe a little.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 111
  • Created
  • Last Reply
5 hours ago, Satyr3206 said:

I don't want this to sound wrong so take it with a grain of salt. Analytics are stats. Most statistically oriented GM's have never played the game. There has to be a middle ground.

That's simply not a true statement. I'd say about 75% of the current GMs have played baseball at some level (high school, college, minors, majors, etc.). And that's probably a conservative estimate. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Redskins Rick said:

What scares the heck out of me, is getting somebody worse.

Buck is far from perfect, but pretty good.

Too many castoffs managers out there, they say, it takes most managers 2 or 3 firings for them to really learn the job and perform it well.

We had a few of managers come through here before Buck, that made me cringe a little.

They don't need a cast off. They need new blood. They should follow the lead of the Yankees, Phillies, and Red Sox and give a young hungry candidate a chance. Let the manager grow with the team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

That's simply not a true statement. I'd say about 75% of the current GMs have played baseball at some level (high school, college, minors, majors, etc.). And that's probably a conservative estimate. 

I don't think so but I'll look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildbillhiccup said:

They don't need a cast off. They need new blood. They should follow the lead of the Yankees, Phillies, and Red Sox and give a young hungry candidate a chance. Let the manager grow with the team. 

Most new managers, dont do well out of the gate, unless they already have a team built for them.

It takes getting fired and self assessment to figure out your faults and correct them, and sometimes more than once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, wildbillhiccup said:

That's simply not a true statement. I'd say about 75% of the current GMs have played baseball at some level (high school, college, minors, majors, etc.). And that's probably a conservative estimate. 

Or Little League.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm ready for a fresh new start at both spots.  A new era calls for a new regime.  We're starting a rebuild and revitalizing a stagnant organization, and what better way to do that than to hire a dynamic new "GM"?  There are strong candidates available right now, and my hope would be that we could convince them that the ways of Peter Angelos are in the past and that they'd be given full autonomy to remake the organization. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like DD to stay. I personally think the new GM's are a bunch of bean counting, stat guys. You can not scout like that. Or run a Franchise like that. You might as well get a bunch of guys that read Baseball America all the time. It's about the players. And that is not all apparent on a stat sheet. Ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Satyr3206 said:

If some 35 year old GM told me something about how I played, and he never put a jock on. That would be an interesting conversation, to say the least.

Whether you like it or not, some of the best GMs currently and in the past years "have never put a jock on." 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
    • I don't see the O's trading Mullins without getting a replacement for him from somewhere.  It's doubtful we have anyone in the minors yet ready to step in for him.  Maybe the same for Urias since he's the perfect backup infielder.  I think Mateo and Mountcastle are more likely to be traded.
    • I was clearly talking about the AL...
    • You mean like how the Os dealt guys like Hays, Stowers and Norby?  Yea, guys who are good depth but guys we can stand to trade are guys I want to trade….and obviously Elias feels similarly. These guys carry value. The level of value depends on the player and you can debate the value of return but yes, you absolutely should trade out of depth and trade guys that perhaps that don’t match your team philosophies.  That’s what teams do.
    • Who knows.  Lots of possibilities. There could be another trade like the Hays trade.  Or maybe you can get a ML ready arm that profiles as a high end reliever. I don’t think that you will get a proven lock down guy but that doesn’t mean you can’t get someone that will end up a big contributor.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...