Jump to content

Gausman, Brach to Pirates?


OrioleLochRaven

Recommended Posts

Just now, LookinUp said:

If the Os do most of what it looks like they will do, the payroll will be very low for several years. That might allow them to bid for a superstar FA too at some point.

Very true, especially once CD contract expires. Hope we sign a superstar after 2021 and become aggressive with extensions for guys we see as building blocks in the next three years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 198
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Just now, baltfan said:

Of course I am just scouting the video, but Cruz looks more promising than Hayes to me.  I'd like both, but Cruz intrigues the heck out of me

That is a guy with ridiculous upside. Hayes looks really good as well, High OBP at the hot corner with plus defense and arm. Hayes is a line drive gap-to-gap hitter. Might hit 15-ish Hrs in the big leagues once mature. Hayes also has a really high ceiling(some view him as a potential upper echelon third baseman). Those two guys would make the trade a big win for us. Two high ceiling guys, one being near-mlb ready.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Thato'sfan said:

That is a guy with ridiculous upside. Hayes looks really good as well, High OBP at the hot corner with plus defense and arm. Hayes is a line drive gap-to-gap hitter. Might hit 15-ish Hrs in the big leagues once mature. Hayes also has a really high ceiling(some view him as a potential upper echelon third baseman). Those two guys would make the trade a big win for us. Two high ceiling guys, one being near-mlb ready.

The ball jumps off of Cruz's bat.   Hayes looks a bit mechanical to me in the video I have seen but I hear his defense is excellent.  Would like both, but just based on what I see Cruz would be the guy that I would go for.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if this was posted already- but also from earlier from a Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reporter:

Stephen J. Nesbitt Retweeted Adam McCalvy

The Pirates are interested in RHPs Kevin Gausman and Mychal Givens, says an industry source. O’s have done background work on a few prospects in recent days. Nothing imminent, but it would bolster Pirates’ depth.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, fearthenoodle said:

Not sure if this was posted already- but also from earlier from a Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reporter:

Stephen J. Nesbitt Retweeted Adam McCalvy

The Pirates are interested in RHPs Kevin Gausman and Mychal Givens, says an industry source. O’s have done background work on a few prospects in recent days. Nothing imminent, but it would bolster Pirates’ depth.

 

Honestly, this type of trade makes sense for the Pirates.  If it doesn't work out, they can still move them in the offseason and the rental likely ends up costing less than if both players were free agents to be.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Hallas said:

I would have expected better for Gausman + Givens.  Unless the non-headliners are all really promising.  Hayes seems similar to Diaz - 55-ish FV prospect on the upswing,  Though he apparently plays 3B well enough to stick there, which is a big plus.

Hayes and Diaz might be enough with a few secondary pieces.  We need the infielders badly.  Adding Hearn is a lot to ask, they might have their choice between the two of Hearn and Diaz.  What is the deal with Cole Tucker? Young, but numbers aren't all that impressive.  Has so SBs.  Could be an interesting secondary piece if the O's were to go with Hayes and Hearn as the headliners.

I see it as Gausman = Hayes and some secondaries, Givens = Diaz or Hearn and some Secondaries

I think four secondaries would be appropriate.  I like the names Kramer, Ogle, Escobar, Castro, Martin, Apostel, Burdi, MacGregor, Kranick, Oliva, Agrazal, Robles, Martin, Reyes, Pie, Nunez.  This website was helpful to get an idea of their system.

http://prospects1500.com/top-50-lists/pittsburgh-pirates-2018-top-50-prospects/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ScGO's said:

Next year's draft if we get the #1 pick, even 2 or 3 could still net that guy

We will three of the first 45 picks, including a top 3 pick. We will likely have 3 of the first 50ish picks in the 2020 draft. We have a chance to draft some high ceiling, impact talent for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ScGO's said:

Hayes and Diaz might be enough with a few secondary pieces.  We need the infielders badly.  Adding Hearn is a lot to ask, they might have their choice between the two of Hearn and Diaz.  What is the deal with Cole Tucker? Young, but numbers aren't all that impressive.  Has so SBs.  Could be an interesting secondary piece if the O's were to go with Hayes and Hearn as the headliners.

I see it as Gausman = Hayes and some secondaries, Givens = Diaz or Hearn and some Secondaries

I think four secondaries would be appropriate.  I like the names Kramer, Ogle, Escobar, Castro, Martin, Apostel, Burdi, MacGregor, Kranick, Oliva, Agrazal, Robles, Martin, Reyes, Pie, Nunez.  This website was helpful to get an idea of their system.

http://prospects1500.com/top-50-lists/pittsburgh-pirates-2018-top-50-prospects/

We already got Diaz from the Dodgers. Perhaps you are thinking Baz?

Hayes, Hearns plus 4  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I have no idea why any team would want more than 1 philosophy across the board, especially a young team. Possibly a player's demands or contract calls for his own hitting coach.. but I stand by my wish.
    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
    • I don't see the O's trading Mullins without getting a replacement for him from somewhere.  It's doubtful we have anyone in the minors yet ready to step in for him.  Maybe the same for Urias since he's the perfect backup infielder.  I think Mateo and Mountcastle are more likely to be traded.
    • I was clearly talking about the AL...
    • You mean like how the Os dealt guys like Hays, Stowers and Norby?  Yea, guys who are good depth but guys we can stand to trade are guys I want to trade….and obviously Elias feels similarly. These guys carry value. The level of value depends on the player and you can debate the value of return but yes, you absolutely should trade out of depth and trade guys that perhaps that don’t match your team philosophies.  That’s what teams do.
    • Who knows.  Lots of possibilities. There could be another trade like the Hays trade.  Or maybe you can get a ML ready arm that profiles as a high end reliever. I don’t think that you will get a proven lock down guy but that doesn’t mean you can’t get someone that will end up a big contributor.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...