Jump to content

Happy anniversary to Buck (first game 8-3-10)


Frobby

Recommended Posts

58 minutes ago, foxfield said:

It was a pretty big deal to get Buck, even if the process (AM wanted someone else) was symptomatic of things to come.  And it says a lot that so many are ready to move on.  The bar Buck set early has been difficult to live up to.  It is kind of ironic that other than age, the qualifications that will be looked for in our next manager will be very similar to those brought to the table.

I am thankful for his contributions.  The memories will be cherished. 

Were we trying to hire Bobby Valentine?  I may be confusing this with 2007 when we offered Giradi a contract and he said no since he knew the Yankees would be calling at the end of that season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Surhoffan17 said:

Were we trying to hire Bobby Valentine?  I may be confusing this with 2007 when we offered Giradi a contract and he said no since he knew the Yankees would be calling at the end of that season. 

AM was rumored to prefer Eric Wedge to Buck.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, foxfield said:

Happy Anniversary Buck.  Let's enjoy the day and remember how far we have traveled.

No matter where we are..I will always remember the tone you set right out of the box....

 

 

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/654285-actually-buck-this-is-why-bostons-epstein-is-smarter 

The above article has a quote from April 2011 where Buck told Men's Journal:

“I’d like to see how smart Theo Epstein is with the Tampa Bay payroll,” Showalter jeers in the April Edition of Men's Journal. “You got Carl Crawford ’cause you paid more than anyone else, and that’s what makes you smarter? That’s why I like whipping their asses: It’s great, knowing those guys with the $205 million payroll are saying, ‘How the hell are they beating us?’ ”

 

Lol and now we know how bad that Crawford contract was. But I guess the Red Sox somehow managed to make it the Dodgers' problem, so maybe not as dumb as one might think 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 99ct said:

Lol and now we know how bad that Crawford contract was. But I guess the Red Sox somehow managed to make it the Dodgers' problem, so maybe not as dumb as one might think 

Yeah...time though really hasn't eroded or changed the tone of the comments.  Regardless of whether it was smart or not Buck was in their face nationally saying essentially the only place you guys are better is money.  And we are gonna kick your ass and enjoy it.

I don't know that I would say he earned his salary with the interview, but he demonstrated his immense desire and skill and the attitude took almost from the moment he walked into the dug out.  I am not gonna cry when he is gone, but Im not gonna forget what he meant here either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.



  • Posts

    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
    • I don't see the O's trading Mullins without getting a replacement for him from somewhere.  It's doubtful we have anyone in the minors yet ready to step in for him.  Maybe the same for Urias since he's the perfect backup infielder.  I think Mateo and Mountcastle are more likely to be traded.
    • I was clearly talking about the AL...
    • You mean like how the Os dealt guys like Hays, Stowers and Norby?  Yea, guys who are good depth but guys we can stand to trade are guys I want to trade….and obviously Elias feels similarly. These guys carry value. The level of value depends on the player and you can debate the value of return but yes, you absolutely should trade out of depth and trade guys that perhaps that don’t match your team philosophies.  That’s what teams do.
    • Who knows.  Lots of possibilities. There could be another trade like the Hays trade.  Or maybe you can get a ML ready arm that profiles as a high end reliever. I don’t think that you will get a proven lock down guy but that doesn’t mean you can’t get someone that will end up a big contributor.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...