Jump to content

Do you like the style of baseball that is currently being played?


Greg Pappas

Recommended Posts

I don't mind any of the stuff the original post mentions.   

But I do not like the game has become a game of mostly homers, strikeouts, and walks.   There are fewer balls in play, which is where most exciting things happen (close plays on the bases, great defensive plays, etc).    It is a less enjoyable game to watch as a fan.

Yes, shifts are PART of the reason that is the case.   But I believe batters will eventually be able to adjust to shifts.   Players who can hit to all fields will become valued more and those skills will be taught in the minors.

But three-true-outcome baseball is simply not as exciting a game, in my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply
31 minutes ago, George Zuverink said:

I think someone has been watching too much Fox News or MSNBC. Or maybe home plate collusion is when the catcher wants to show up his pitcher by telling the batter what the pitcher is going to throw?

Haha whoops!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Oriol3s said:

Hey, I get it.  Just because they can pitch or hit a baseball better than 99.9% of the planet, why do they deserve SO MUCH more than others who also have unique talents in other fields?  However, what do you propose?  That the BILLIONAIRE owners get to pocket that money?  They're no more deserving of that money than the players.  It would be nice if there was an easy solution.

Also, for every selfish jerk of an athlete, there are guys like Adam Jones, who pour tons of their income back into the community and youth programs, building areas that are neglected or underfunded by everyone else.

Yea, I absolutely get that a lot of players do some stuff and get their picture taken and it's helpful and inspiring. That's nice. It doesn't move the needle enough to make me personally approve of their salaries. Maybe stadiums should be funded by the billionaire owners? Maybe the baseballs should be made in the USA by well paid employees? Maybe a bunch of money could be funneled into grants for local colleges or jobs at the stadium for college student. I'm in a rush and just spit balling here but I can think of a lot of different ways to spend money than on the players. Of course the players should get paid well, they have an incredibly difficult job. 20 million a year? That's crazy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, oriole said:

Yea, I absolutely get that a lot of players do some stuff and get their picture taken and it's helpful and inspiring. That's nice. It doesn't move the needle enough to make me personally approve of their salaries. Maybe stadiums should be funded by the billionaire owners? Maybe the baseballs should be made in the USA by well paid employees? Maybe a bunch of money could be funneled into grants for local colleges or jobs at the stadium for college student. I'm in a rush and just spit balling here but I can think of a lot of different ways to spend money than on the players. Of course the players should get paid well, they have an incredibly difficult job. 20 million a year? That's crazy. 

Do you have the same ill feelings at how much Tom Cruise or Meryl Streep or Jack Nicholson gets to make a movie?    Or how much Beyonce or Bruce Springsteen can command for a concert tour?

I hear people complain about athlete's salaries all the time, and I hear far less complaints about people who get paid huge amounts of money in other areas in the entertainment field.   I have always wondered why that's the case?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, mdbdotcom said:

Allow both teams to add another player to the active roster during interleague play.

That doesn't deal with the problem. AL pitchers shouldn't have to risk injury batting and running the bases.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My favorite baseball plays involve baserunning and fielding. I don't much care for watching home runs, strike outs, walks foul balls, and repeated throws to first to hold runners.  I think baseball should experiment with some of the following:

  • Moving the pitching rubber back a couple of feet.
  • Requiring a minimum thickness for bat handles (a subject on which Bill James has harped for years).
  • Making the ball less lively.
  • Limiting the number of throws to first per batter.
  • Calling a batter out on, say, the fifth or sixth foul ball with strike two.
  • Making the distance to outfield fences greater (probably impractical).

I'd also like to see the time between innings shortened. And the way in which reviews of umpire calls are conducted needs to be expedited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




  • Posts

    • I have no idea why any team would want more than 1 philosophy across the board, especially a young team. Possibly a player's demands or contract calls for his own hitting coach.. but I stand by my wish.
    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
    • I don't see the O's trading Mullins without getting a replacement for him from somewhere.  It's doubtful we have anyone in the minors yet ready to step in for him.  Maybe the same for Urias since he's the perfect backup infielder.  I think Mateo and Mountcastle are more likely to be traded.
    • I was clearly talking about the AL...
    • You mean like how the Os dealt guys like Hays, Stowers and Norby?  Yea, guys who are good depth but guys we can stand to trade are guys I want to trade….and obviously Elias feels similarly. These guys carry value. The level of value depends on the player and you can debate the value of return but yes, you absolutely should trade out of depth and trade guys that perhaps that don’t match your team philosophies.  That’s what teams do.
    • Who knows.  Lots of possibilities. There could be another trade like the Hays trade.  Or maybe you can get a ML ready arm that profiles as a high end reliever. I don’t think that you will get a proven lock down guy but that doesn’t mean you can’t get someone that will end up a big contributor.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...