Jump to content

The early returns from the four deadline deals


Frobby

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Sure.  I mean, everyone should be tradeable.  But you said it yourself, his contract expires after the 2020 season.  I said he'd be good for the next 2-3 years.  Glad you agree with me :) 

Schoop would have good for the team in 2019 yet there was no reason to keep him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Here's what I'm thinking we end up with from these deals, as decent nuggets:

Machado >> Kremer

Schoop >> Villar

Britton >> Rogers

Gausman, O'Day >> Mesa, Encarnacion

Could be worse. Guess we'll take what we can get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, now said:

Here's what I'm thinking we end up with from these deals, as decent nuggets:

Machado >> Kremer

Schoop >> Villar

Britton >> Rogers

Gausman, O'Day >> Mesa, Encarnacion

Could be worse. Guess we'll take what we can get.

Rogers was the third piece of the trade, and seems like he will be a fifth starter at best.  Anything you've seen in particular that would make you think he could be a nugget?  I'm much more excited to see what Tate and Carroll can become.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

Rogers was the third piece of the trade, and seems like he will be a fifth starter at best.  Anything you've seen in particular that would make you think he could be a nugget?  I'm much more excited to see what Tate and Carroll can become.  

One of the best things about Buck leaving will be the retirement of the term nugget.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, ChuckS said:

Rogers was the third piece of the trade, and seems like he will be a fifth starter at best.  Anything you've seen in particular that would make you think he could be a nugget?  I'm much more excited to see what Tate and Carroll can become.  

More like not having much hope for Tate or Carroll, so hoping Rogers' moxie translates to some moderate success as a swingman. Admittedly, there's still lots of snow (white noise) in the crystal ball. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/5/2018 at 2:41 PM, Luke-OH said:

Some notes on mechanical or pitch mix changes the Orioles have made with these players after they were acquired.

Jean Carlos Encarnacion had adopted a closed stance at the plate after the first month of the season, after being acquired by the Orioles he abandoned this and went back to a neutral stance and striding open. 

Cody Carroll began throwing a splitter (he had a changeup before, not sure if it was a splitter, but he hadn't been throwing it this year).

Jean Carmona's pre-swing hand motion was reduced greatly.

Dillon Tate (as Frobby mentioned) after one start with Bowie, shifted to throwing a 2S FB as his primary FB as opposed to a pitch he threw infrequently before being acquired.

Dean Kremer is still primarily FB/CB, but he's been throwing his changeup more and it has looked better. Slider usage has been reduced.

Yusniel Diaz shifted his back foot position at the plate, closing it off some, probably a first step to try and get rid of the movement of the rear foot during his swing. 

Are these changes coming about as a result of the Orioles' coaches? If so, that's scary, because most of them are moving in the wrong direction. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, now said:

Here's what I'm thinking we end up with from these deals, as decent nuggets:

Machado >> Kremer

Schoop >> Villar

Britton >> Rogers

Gausman, O'Day >> Mesa, Encarnacion

Could be worse. Guess we'll take what we can get.

You are already giving up on Yusniel Diaz, our #1 prospect?

I also think Ortiz's resume is too strong for him not to have some success. The Brewers fans were not happy to give them up, and that was before Villar started producing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bradysburns said:

Are these changes coming about as a result of the Orioles' coaches? If so, that's scary, because most of them are moving in the wrong direction. 

Sometimes you have to take a step backward now to take a step forward later.  If you have developed bad habits that will hurt you at higher levels, you need to change your approach, even if in the short run you will struggle while getting used to doing things differently.  Luke's description of mechanical changes made by some of these players give me more hope that they will eventually succeed.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Aristotelian said:

You are already giving up on Yusniel Diaz, our #1 prospect?

I also think Ortiz's resume is too strong for him not to have some success. The Brewers fans were not happy to give them up, and that was before Villar started producing.

Sure, anything's possible. I'm going by early returns and then just made a leap of sheer intuition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, now said:

Here's what I'm thinking we end up with from these deals, as decent nuggets:

Machado >> Kremer

Schoop >> Villar

Britton >> Rogers

Gausman, O'Day >> Mesa, Encarnacion

Could be worse. Guess we'll take what we can get.

Edit:::miss interpreted your post 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sevastras said:

Edit:::miss interpreted your post 

And maybe I wasn't clear. Not so much about those particular players, but more a what-if exercise (to use another Showalterism), to wonder: If this is all we end up for solid players from these trades, will we be happy with the return? I think I'd be satisfied if it panned out like that, with those guys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Three Run Homer said:

Sometimes you have to take a step backward now to take a step forward later.  If you have developed bad habits that will hurt you at higher levels, you need to change your approach, even if in the short run you will struggle while getting used to doing things differently.  Luke's description of mechanical changes made by some of these players give me more hope that they will eventually succeed.  

I do get that idea - unlearning. But it seems to me that the Orioles have a habit of being the bad teachers... not the masters who must help players "unlearn" inferior techniques, etc. So when WE are doing the unlearning, that concerns me... that was my impression of what was happening. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/18/2018 at 7:51 PM, Bradysburns said:

Are these changes coming about as a result of the Orioles' coaches? If so, that's scary, because most of them are moving in the wrong direction. 

 

10 hours ago, sevastras said:

Edit:::miss interpreted your post 

Look at encarnacion right foot.  He’s bailing it out - moving it back ala Robert andino.  That needs to be fixed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 297 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online



  • Posts

    • I really hope the Ravens win this one. I hate all Washington teams and always root for them to lose but especially if they are playing Baltimore teams 
    • I really don’t see the point of trading Mullins, or even Mountcastle for a reliever. We need Mullins definitely, especially with Santander being a FA.  What good is a reliever if you can’t get a lead?  I just don’t like trading everyday players for relievers, especially when we have a good looking pen next year pre deadline, and what reliever would Mounty/Mullins even buy. Would that reliever even be an upgrade over what we already have? At this point, I’m thinking Mounty goes for some sort of RHH COF. 
    • We couldn’t have asked for more from the Eflin deal than what we got. 9 starts that kept the rotation afloat to even make the playoffs. Then a “good” playoff start in an elimination game where we had the luxury of going to the pen fast.  It’s always tough giving up prospects, but Eflin did exactly what we needed him to do post deadline.   
    • There should be one philosophy, and that's what the O's claimed to have. There's just a lot more work to coaching 13 hitters (plus callups) than one person can do. Going through video, coordinating with the data folks, developing a plan, all that stuff. Only so many hours in the day.
    • I have no idea why any team would want more than 1 philosophy across the board, especially a young team. Possibly a player's demands or contract calls for his own hitting coach.. but I stand by my wish.
    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...