Jump to content

Hardball Talk: Why can't the Orioles develop pitchers?


weams

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Going Underground said:

Convention business has decreased because the convention center is too small.Lost two more conventions this year due to space limitations. Want to build out for a bigger convention center and incredibly another hotel .

That’s what the city says.  There’s always another reason to pay taxpayer money chasing tourist dollars.  The convention center was too small than they built it larger, the my needed a hotel supposedly to attract more business, now the convention center is too small again.  Same story different year.  It could have nothing to do with crime, riots, and the general saftey concerns that people outside the city have toward downtown? Because since the riots, downtown businesses have suffered tremendously.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply
9 hours ago, Punchandjudy said:

That’s what the city says.  There’s always another reason to pay taxpayer money chasing tourist dollars.  The convention center was too small than they built it larger, the my needed a hotel supposedly to attract more business, now the convention center is too small again.  Same story different year.  It could have nothing to do with crime, riots, and the general saftey concerns that people outside the city have toward downtown? Because since the riots, downtown businesses have suffered tremendously.  

Crime has hurt many businesses. But in 2016 ,Baltimore had its most tourists ever.  The Convention center in 2017 booked the second most conventions ever. They have lost conventions due to size. Maybe some due to crime but not seen any data to back up that fact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My main issue with the O's (at least on the surface) is that they don't try and play to the player's strengths. It seems they have a very hard headed approach to pigeonhole players into a specific bucket as opposed to having them continue to do what made them successful in the first place. 

FWIW, that's mainly related to starting pitching. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, LookitsPuck said:

My main issue with the O's (at least on the surface) is that they don't try and play to the player's strengths. It seems they have a very hard headed approach to pigeonhole players into a specific bucket as opposed to having them continue to do what made them successful in the first place. 

FWIW, that's mainly related to starting pitching. 

This is what it feels like to me.  IF this is the case, then I have no idea how after all of these years that we haven't figured out that this approach isn't working.  I actually like it when guys like Gausman go elsewhere and get better.  Not only do I feel that shedding the Oriole uniform turns them into Andy Dufresne in the river in Shawshank, but it calls to light that we are really bad at a key aspect of the game....and maybe we should try and learn from other teams who do this better than we do.  (As opposed to assuming that our way is the right way).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Camden_yardbird said:

This analysis is pretty incomplete unless you show me the breakdown of drafted starting pitchers vs. International starting pitchers in the allstar game over the last 18 years.  If it shows a large proportion of international pitchers then I will buy the analysis.

I’d hardly dignify the response quoted in the OP by calling it an “analysis.”    By my count, of the top 100 active pitchers in pitcher WAR, 23 were international signings.    So, ignore that market and you’ve cut about 1/4 of your prospects.   But that is not sufficient to explain why the O’s have such a poor record of developing pitchers over the last 20 years.    I’d say it’s a mixture of poor drafting, poor coaching and bad luck with injuries, as well as our tendency to ignore the international market.   What portion of the blame you put on each factor is a matter of opinion.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Frobby said:

I’d hardly dignify the response quoted in the OP by calling it an “analysis.”    By my count, of the top 100 active pitchers in pitcher WAR, 23 were international signings.    So, ignore that market and you’ve cut about 1/4 of your prospects.   But that is not sufficient to explain why the O’s have such a poor record of developing pitchers over the last 20 years.    I’d say it’s a mixture of poor drafting, poor coaching and bad luck with injuries, as well as our tendency to ignore the international market.   What portion of the blame you put on each factor is a matter of opinion.   

Well, since they have ignored the international market it stands to reason development of pitchers is poor. I don’t remember too many picks other than  Hobgood being panned. 

Player development and coaching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Il BuonO said:

Well, since they have ignored the international market it stands to reason development of pitchers is poor. I don’t remember too many picks other than  Hobgood being panned. 

Player development and coaching.

Injuries can’t be ignored.    Bundy’s never had the same velocity post TJ, Harvey can’t stay healthy, Sedlock has had arm problems, Loewen’s elbow fractures doomed him, Hobgood in addition to being a reach had shoulder surgery, Chris Smith and Beau Hale had injuries that cut their careers short well before reaching the majors....right there that’s 7 no. 1 picks who had injuries impact their career path.    Now, in some of those cases the scouts might have identified the injury risk, and/or the way in which those pitchers were handled may have led to their injuries.    And, every team experiences pitching injuries to one degree or another.    But I’d still say we’ve had our share of pure bad luck in this regard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

Injuries can’t be ignored.    Bundy’s never had the same velocity post TJ, Harvey can’t stay healthy, Sedlock has had arm problems, Loewen’s elbow fractures doomed him, Hobgood in addition to being a reach had shoulder surgery, Chris Smith and Beau Hale had injuries that cut their careers short well before reaching the majors....right there that’s 7 no. 1 picks who had injuries impact their career path.    Now, in some of those cases the scouts might have identified the injury risk, and/or the way in which those pitchers were handled may have led to their injuries.    And, every team experiences pitching injuries to one degree or another.    But I’d still say we’ve had our share of pure bad luck in this regard.

Certainly injuries play a part, but as you said, all teams go through it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 297 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online



  • Posts

    • I really hope the Ravens win this one. I hate all Washington teams and always root for them to lose but especially if they are playing Baltimore teams 
    • I really don’t see the point of trading Mullins, or even Mountcastle for a reliever. We need Mullins definitely, especially with Santander being a FA.  What good is a reliever if you can’t get a lead?  I just don’t like trading everyday players for relievers, especially when we have a good looking pen next year pre deadline, and what reliever would Mounty/Mullins even buy. Would that reliever even be an upgrade over what we already have? At this point, I’m thinking Mounty goes for some sort of RHH COF. 
    • We couldn’t have asked for more from the Eflin deal than what we got. 9 starts that kept the rotation afloat to even make the playoffs. Then a “good” playoff start in an elimination game where we had the luxury of going to the pen fast.  It’s always tough giving up prospects, but Eflin did exactly what we needed him to do post deadline.   
    • There should be one philosophy, and that's what the O's claimed to have. There's just a lot more work to coaching 13 hitters (plus callups) than one person can do. Going through video, coordinating with the data folks, developing a plan, all that stuff. Only so many hours in the day.
    • I have no idea why any team would want more than 1 philosophy across the board, especially a young team. Possibly a player's demands or contract calls for his own hitting coach.. but I stand by my wish.
    • At cost considerations there is 2 players i'd rather have listed in that article over Crochet, Helsley leading that. Also Mountcastle to the Reds for a SP makes a lot of sense also. 
    • Guilty. I'm working to be intentional to enjoy the day to day of a lot of exciting careers beginning, and not miss the moment as during say Peyton Manning's career in a different chapter of life when assured 14-2 or 13-3 seasons were four months of boredom while you waited to see what the playoff stumble would be this time.    SIGBOT's stuff works in the regular season same as Billy Beane's didn't in the playoffs. I don't follow Over/Unders, but would guess the 2025 Orioles are 1st or 2nd in the AL on early action.    My informal AL power rankings end of 2024: 1. A nonexistent Orioles team with a functional Adley Rutschman 2. Yankees with Soto 3. Tie between actual Orioles with broken Adley and end stage Astros that lost several series to hot Central teams 4. Yankees without Soto 5. Central I'm cheating Cleveland there for a joke, and hope they win, which they are plenty capable of doing.    It is an interesting matchup for the stuff the two teams are good at being very different.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...