Jump to content

Chris Holt promoted to Director of Pitching


interloper

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, mdbdotcom said:

I think he's the new Pitching Czar, with all pitching coaches following his lead on all pitching matters.

"More involved on the major league side". Interesting. He is director of pitching, a promotion from previous position of minor league coordinator, but emphasizes that Brocail is the MLB coach. That doesn't answer the question of whether Brocail answers to Holt but it sounds like it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

That's how I read that title and that's a good thing. There needs to be one guy in charge of the pitching coaches and coordinators at the major and minor league levels. Everyone needs to be rowing the same way and not poking holes in the boat!

I am glad it is working that way and that it is someone deeply involved in the data that calls the shots.  There won't be any end arounds in this grouping. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tony-OH said:

That's how I read that title and that's a good thing. There needs to be one guy in charge of the pitching coaches and coordinators at the major and minor league levels. Everyone needs to be rowing the same way and not poking holes in the boat!

That's what I hoped would happen when Duquette brought in that one guy who I'm blanking on early in his tenure. Rick Peterson? It obviously did not work out that way and I'm not sure that guy was very good anyway. But the O's have been needing one vision throughout the organization for about as long as I've followed them. Might finally be getting there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, interloper said:

That's what I hoped would happen when Duquette brought in that one guy who I'm blanking on early in his tenure. Rick Peterson? It obviously did not work out that way and I'm not sure that guy was very good anyway. But the O's have been needing one vision throughout the organization for about as long as I've followed them. Might finally be getting there. 

Its relatively simple.

Rule 1 - Throw Strikes

Rule 2 - Throw Strikes

Rule 3 - When in doubt revert back to rule 1:) :) :)

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is a good Holt interview on MLB Orioles web site.  I love hearing about the step up our minor league pitchers had throughout the system this year.  He talked about guys not in the conversation prior to the season now forcing their way into it.  Strikeout rates took a big jump.  It's so refreshing to see this.  It shows that there was already talent in the system and how good organizations maximize it.   We fans tend to think along lines of hitting or missing on draft picks when it is the development of those picks which is more important.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Melewski has a nice interview of Chris Holt up.    https://www.masnsports.com/steve-melewski/2019/11/a-look-at-the-pitching-on-the-farm-this-year-with-chris-holt.html

Here’s a few quotes:

”It really is about the individual improvement and an individualized approach to development,” Holt said. “Blanket programs generally fail to account for a lot of things that players may have that make them special. I can think of guys I played with in the minors that may have had a really special breaking ball and the organization I was in was preaching you need to throw 85 or 90 percent fastballs.

“So, these days we know better. If a guy has a really special breaking ball, we’re going to ask him to throw it, instead of making him throw a bunch of fastballs. That is an example of, OK, he had this strength and has to develop these other things. We have a more accurate picture of where to put the work in. All we are really talking about is having a better plan for assessing and correcting and improving what it is that we are working with in development. The fact is that we have more accurate information to form development plans for players that are more substantive, more meaningful and more accurate in terms of the feedback we are able to provide for them.”

* * *

It is encouraging to see strikeout numbers improve,” said Holt. “We made a nice jump in one year. That is good. But we know that pitching is more than strikeouts. But what that does tells us is that when we have guys striking players out, we have guys developing better stuff instead of just trying to learn how to pitch with mediocre stuff. And they are also attacking the zone. They are being more aggressive and developing more intent to attack hitters. Those two indications are, culturally, very, very important to what we are trying to build here.

“The strikeout numbers improving is great. Those things can fluctuate from year to year. But in a general sense, we have the red meat of what it is we are working to develop in place when we start to see the strikeout numbers improve.

“The other thing you see increase with that is walk rate with a lot of guys. Because they are throwing a lot of non-fastballs in fastball counts. So, learning how to command all their other pitches and throwing them in different counts, we’re going to walk more guys because that is just a byproduct of doing some of that work at the minor league level. I’d much rather have them doing it now than trying to figure that out at Triple-A or the big leagues.

“The bigger point here is, walk rates will increase at times when we are asking guys to throw all their pitches at higher rate instead of just throw a bunch of fastballs all the time.”

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both of those interviews are great reads/listens.  It is refreshing to finally hear this kind of talk coming from the organization.  

For all of the naysayers out there on whether Elias has authority or not, Chris Holt would never be hired under previous regimes, nor would anyone be talking the things that he is talking.  Someone from the Orioles past with archaic views would be in charge, and nothing would ever change.  Embracing this new model is such an awesome thing to see. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/11/2019 at 11:50 AM, Tony-OH said:

That's how I read that title and that's a good thing. There needs to be one guy in charge of the pitching coaches and coordinators at the major and minor league levels. Everyone needs to be rowing the same way and not poking holes in the boat!

Elias has his people in here now. I think that’s why last year we saw a very cautious approach to promotions. I’m looking forward to the org taking a step forward pitching wise. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/11/2019 at 11:46 AM, Aristotelian said:

"More involved on the major league side". Interesting. He is director of pitching, a promotion from previous position of minor league coordinator, but emphasizes that Brocail is the MLB coach. That doesn't answer the question of whether Brocail answers to Holt but it sounds like it.

 

On 10/11/2019 at 11:50 AM, Tony-OH said:

That's how I read that title and that's a good thing. There needs to be one guy in charge of the pitching coaches and coordinators at the major and minor league levels. Everyone needs to be rowing the same way and not poking holes in the boat!

I would imagine that Brocail is already down with Elias' new-fangled ways. There already were cuts to the ML coaches and Brocail wasn't one of them. Again I would imagine Broc and Holt are already rowing the same way, not like Holt is going to be dictating that Broc has to change. Working together to form a plan and then Brocail implements it as the nuts and bolts PC. Same with all the pitching coaches down the line. Either weeded out or new hires, they're probably all already of an analytical mindset. JMHO

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, scOtt said:

 

I would imagine that Brocail is already down with Elias' new-fangled ways. There already were cuts to the ML coaches and Brocail wasn't one of them. Again I would imagine Broc and Holt are already rowing the same way, not like Holt is going to be dictating that Broc has to change. Working together to form a plan and then Brocail implements it as the nuts and bolts PC. Same with all the pitching coaches down the line. Either weeded out or new hires, they're probably all already of an analytical mindset. JMHO

This is a good point, the pitching coaches don’t need to be analytical whizzes. They just need to have bought in to the process. So when an analyst comes to the pitching coach and says that John Q Pitcher needs to get more separation between his slider and curveball to give hitters different looks. The pitching coach’s job would be to trust the evaluation and work with the pitcher using the appropriate cues/grip adjustments to achieve the desired outcome, which would then be documented/verified by Rapsodo/Edgertronic data.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
    • I was a lot younger back then, but that betrayal hit really hard because he had been painting himself as literally holier than thou, and shook his finger to a congressional committee and then barely 2 weeks later failed the test.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...