Jump to content

Who will be #21-#25 prospects?


Tony-OH

Who will be #21-#25 prospects?  

54 members have voted

  1. 1. Who will be #21-#25 prospects?

    • Bannon, Pop, L. Rodriguez, Sedlock, Tate
    • Bannon, Stauffer, Pop, L. Rodriguez, Fenter
    • Fenter, Tate, Stauffer, Cumberland, Bannon
    • Stauffer, Tate, Grenier, McCoy, L. Rodriguez
    • Tate, Fenter, Stauffer, L.Rodriguez, Pop


Recommended Posts

I like option 2 best.   I eliminated 3 and 4 because I don’t see any of Cumberland, Grenier and McCoy being ranked this high.   I eliminated 1 because I can’t see including Rodriguez but excluding Stauffer.    That leaves 2 and 5, and I chose 2 because I prefer Bannon to Tate (the other four players are the same in both choices).   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

I like option 2 best.   I eliminated 3 and 4 because I don’t see any of Cumberland, Grenier and McCoy being ranked this high.   I eliminated 1 because I can’t see including Rodriguez but excluding Stauffer.    That leaves 2 and 5, and I chose 2 because I prefer Bannon to Tate (the other four players are the same in both choices).   

I think Luke's pretty high on Cumberland.  But other than that I generally agree with your take.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, glenn__davis said:

I think Luke's pretty high on Cumberland.  But other than that I generally agree with your take.

Yes, yes he is and I can't seem to shake him of it, but appreciate his persistence! :D

I believe he had three guys I did not have on my list at all and we ended up including two if I recall. Honestly when we get into the late 20s area, arguments can be made for the guys that just missed.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Frobby said:

I like option 2 best.   I eliminated 3 and 4 because I don’t see any of Cumberland, Grenier and McCoy being ranked this high.   I eliminated 1 because I can’t see including Rodriguez but excluding Stauffer.    That leaves 2 and 5, and I chose 2 because I prefer Bannon to Tate (the other four players are the same in both choices).   

Yeah, this was pretty much the reasoning I went with.  I also felt Stauffer and Fenter should be a tad higher than Sedlock and Tate, hence option 2 over option 1.  I've got Sedlock and Tate at 26 and 27.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

Yes, yes he is and I can't seem to shake him of it, but appreciate his persistence! :D

I believe he had three guys I did not have on my list at all and we ended up including two if I recall. Honestly when we get into the late 20s area, arguments can be made for the guys that just missed.

 

When he tries that stuff, just say to him, "Matthias Dietz."   

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Frobby said:

When he tries that stuff, just say to him, "Matthias Dietz."   

Ha, got me there. Overestimated the ability of a guy to make poor mechanics work. I thought the move to the pen would help. It’s a shame, the raw stuff was as good as Baumann or Harvey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • The same thing was happening was MacDonald was the DC and when Wink was the DC, that makes me put most of the blame on Harbaugh 
    • dWAR is just the run value for defense added with the defensive adjustment.  Corner OF spots have a -7.5 run adjustment, while CF has a +2.5 adjustment over 150 games.    Since Cowser played both CF and the corners they pro-rate his time at each to calculate his defensive adjustment. 
    • Just to be clear, though, fWAR also includes a substantial adjustment for position, including a negative one for Cowser.  For a clearer example on that front, as the chart posted higher on this page indicates, Carlos Santana had a +14 OAA — which is the source data that fWAR’s defensive component is based on. That 14 outs above average equates to 11-12 (they use different values on this for some reason) runs better than the average 1B.  So does Santana have a 12.0 defensive value, per fWAR? He does not. That’s because they adjust his defensive value downward to reflect that he’s playing a less difficult/valuable position. In this case, that adjustment comes out to -11.0 runs, as you can see here:   So despite apparently having a bona fide Gold Glove season, Santana’s Fielding Runs value (FanGraphs’ equivalent to dWAR) is barely above average, at 1.1 runs.    Any good WAR calculation is going to adjust for position. Being a good 1B just isn’t worth as much as being an average SS or catcher. Just as being a good LF isn’t worth as much as being an average CF. Every outfielder can play LF — only the best outfielders can play CF.  Where the nuance/context shows up here is with Cowser’s unique situation. Playing LF in OPACY, with all that ground to cover, is not the same as playing LF at Fenway or Yankee Stadium. Treating Cowser’s “position” as equivalent to Tyler O’Neill’s, for example, is not fair. The degree of difficulty is much, much higher at OPACY’s LF, and so the adjustment seems out of whack for him. That’s the one place where I’d say the bWAR value is “unfair” to Cowser.
    • Wait a second here, the reason he's -0.1 in bb-ref dwar is because they're using drs to track his defensive run value.  He's worth 6.6 runs in defense according to fangraphs, which includes adjustments for position, which would give him a fangraphs defensive war of +0.7.
    • A little funny to have provided descriptions of the hits (“weak” single; “500 foot” HR). FIP doesn’t care about any of that either, so it’s kind of an odd thing to add in an effort to make ERA look bad.  Come in, strike out the first hitter, then give up three 108 MPH rocket doubles off the wall. FIP thinks you were absolutely outstanding, and it’s a shame your pathetic defense and/or sheer bad luck let you down. Next time you’ll (probably) get the outcomes you deserve. They’re both flawed. So is xFIP. So is SIERA. So is RA/9. So is WPA. So is xERA. None of them are perfect measures of how a pitcher’s actual performance was, because there’s way too much context and too many variables for any one metric to really encompass.  But when I’m thinking about awards, for me at least, it ends up having to be about the actual outcomes. I don’t really care what a hitter’s xWOBA is when I’m thinking about MVP, and the same is true for pitchers. Did you get the outs? Did the runs score? That’s the “value” that translates to the scoreboard and, ultimately, to the standings. So I think the B-R side of it is more sensible for awards.  I definitely take into account the types of factors that you (and other pitching fWAR advocates) reference as flaws. So if a guy plays in front of a particular bad defense or had a particularly high percentage of inherited runners score, I’d absolutely adjust my take to incorporate that info. And I also 100% go to Fangraphs first when I’m trying to figure out which pitchers we should acquire (i.e., for forward looking purposes).  But I just can’t bring myself say that my Cy Young is just whichever guy had the best ratio of Ks to BBs to HRs over a threshold number of innings. As @Frobby said, it just distills out too much of what actually happened.
    • We were all a lot younger in 2005.  No one wanted to believe Canseco cause he’s a smarmy guy. Like I said, he was the only one telling the truth. It wasn’t a leap of faith to see McGwire up there and Sosa up there and think “yeah, those guys were juicing” but then suddenly look at Raffy and think he was completely innocent.  It’s a sad story. The guy should be in Hall of Fame yet 500 homers and 3,000 hits are gone like a fart in the wind cause his legacy is wagging his finger and thinking he couldn’t get caught.  Don’t fly too close to the sun.  
    • I think if we get the fun sprinkler loving Gunnar that was in the dugout yesterday, I don’t think we have to worry about him pressing. He seemed loose and feeling good with the other guys he was with, like Kremer.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...