Jump to content

Bundy traded to Angels for Isaac Mattson, Kyle Bradish, Zach Peek, and Kyle Brnovich


MurphDogg

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Roll Tide said:

They wont have Martin OPS was .581 and the A level SS they will pick up in the rule 5 won't be that good. Davis will be here and if they deal Mancini he probabaly starts everyday at 1B (especially early in the season). Bundy's replacement almost certainly will have negative value

You mean like Wojo, who was basically the same as Bundy?

I think your pessimism has obscured the fact that when you're a 54-win team you're close enough to replacement level that you don't lose much by just fielding waiver wire players.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tony-OH said:

After giving away Villar it's not surprising Bundy was next as we heard he was on the trading block. Although Luke did a good job of doing a quick take, I decided to go watch some video of these guys to give mine since I'd never heard of any of them.

Overall it looks like Elias went for quantity as well as basically acquiring two additional draft picks from last year's draft. Zach Peek looks like the upside lottery ticket in this deal. 

Here's my quick take on the four guys acquired.

Zach Peek: The Angels 6th round pick this year, he probably has the most upside of any of the pitchers acquired. A guy who showed a three pitch mix who struggled with a his breaking ball and slipped to the 6th round despite some nice upside. I like this upside of getting this guy in the deal. He's a 40 with a 50 upside.

Kyle Bradish: Pitched at 22-years old last year in High-A ball. Uses an extreme over the top delivery to generate a 90-94 MPH fastball that has some natural cutting action at times. His 12-6 curveball (80-82) is his out pitch and it can flash plus at times, but it's inconsistent. His changeup is firm and hard at 86-87 MPH. Looks like a relief profile to me. He's a 40 with a 45 upside.

Kyle Brnovich: 21-year old 8th round pick of the Angels in 2019, Brnovich sits 90-91, with a slider (81-82, and change (82-83). Funky delivery suggests he might be better in a relief role. His slider looks like his best pitch with some late life and break. If he can pick up a little velocity he has a chance at a middle relief role. He's a 35 for me with a 40 upside.

Issac Mattson: 23-years old, right-handed reliever with a 88-91 MPH fastball that he commands pretty well and seems to get some deception so it plays up a bit. He offsets that with breaking ball that he varies between 80-82 and a below average occasional change. He's a 35 for me with a 40 upside.

Good stuff Tony, just added it to the opening post.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder why a guy like Elias accepted such low-ceiling guys. I trust Tony’s judgement( and Luke’s too) so when he says a guy has a 40 upside, which is “up and down” guy, and the best guy in the deal has a hopeful ceiling of “average” that sounds like a poor return.

i don’t understand it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Philip said:

I wonder why a guy like Elias accepted such low-ceiling guys. I trust Tony’s judgement( and Luke’s too) so when he says a guy has a 40 upside, which is “up and down” guy, and the best guy in the deal has a hopeful ceiling of “average” that sounds like a poor return.

i don’t understand it.

Because you never get to be a 50. Unless you are a 40 first. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Philip said:

I wonder why a guy like Elias accepted such low-ceiling guys. I trust Tony’s judgement( and Luke’s too) so when he says a guy has a 40 upside, which is “up and down” guy, and the best guy in the deal has a hopeful ceiling of “average” that sounds like a poor return.

i don’t understand it.

40 isn't "up and down" guy, it is middle relief.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Philip said:

I wonder why a guy like Elias accepted such low-ceiling guys. I trust Tony’s judgement( and Luke’s too) so when he says a guy has a 40 upside, which is “up and down” guy, and the best guy in the deal has a hopeful ceiling of “average” that sounds like a poor return.

i don’t understand it.

It's hard to get high ceiling prospects in return for a back of the rotation starter, I'd imagine.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • It’s my understanding that nationally televised games are usually blacked out. Consider a free trial subscription of Fubo if they are still offering it. 
    • The Orioles starters absolutely have to do better against the Royals. You can't ask this bullpen to pitch most of the game and expect to win. Right now I probably trust Coulombe the most and Soto (which I never would have guessed a couple weeks back). Perez has been really shaky recently to the point I'm wondering is he nursing a tired arm or minor injuey. Cano hasn't been good as well and O's really need him to get back into a groove. And Akin is usually trustworthy, but only starting the inning clean.
    • I'll be working at Gate F.  If you're getting drunk at Pickles before the game and then walk through the closest gate, you'll walk right past me.
    • What happens if it rains all day?
    • For me, bullpen strategy in a short series is developing a core principle or two and working backwards from that. That’s usually going to involve how we want to pitch to their best guys. In this case, there’s really no way to game Witt. He doesn’t have any discernible platoon splits, and in fact he destroyed RHPs this year. He doesn’t even have any particular pitches he struggles against. If you have to pitch to him, power stuff seems to be the way to go — if he has any weakness, it seems like maybe it’s LHPs who can attack him with high velocity and some sort of off speed weapon (Skubal, Framber, Kikuchi, EdRod, Rodon, Sale, Gore). So maybe you’re looking at Soto and Perez there, although you really just shouldn’t be pitching to him at all if you can avoid it. Beyond him, the other “hero” is Salvador Perez. And that’s from where I’d be building out my strategy. He probably should not see a LHP all series. There’s a fairly meaningful career platoon split there (109 wRC+ to 101), and it’s been more pronounced this year (130 to 110). I would be looking to force feed him ABs against Cano (1/4 with a single), Webb (0/2 with two Ks), and Dominguez. He’s always had trouble with offspeed stuff, which means Webb might be the preferred option. They’ve faced a ton of LH starters in the last week or so, but it seems like their preferred lineup against RHPs stacks LH hitters like Melendez and Gurriel behind Perez. Melendez is awful against LHPs, so ideally Perez might be the last hitter that the starters see. They pinch hit very liberally in platoon fashion in the bottom half of the lineup, so if you brought in someone like Akin behind the starter, they might very well hit for him. Forcing them to do that erases a lot of the platoon stacking in the late innings, so you could subsequently bring in a RHP to pitch to Perez without the same concern that they’d be exposed after him.    In sum, I think the ideal attack plan is for Burnes/Eflin/Kremer to see Perez three times, then bring in Akin or Cionel to pitch to the bottom of what will likely be a lefty-heavy lineup. They’ll potentially PH there, but that’s okay because none of those guys are that good. You then go to one of the RHPs for the top of the lineup, which it seems will consist of Pham, Witt (pitch around), and Perez. Then back to Coulombe or Soto for the bottom of the lineup again.
    • I have two tickets to Game 1 of the WC which I cannot use due to work travel.  Section 352, row 4, seats 9 & 10.  Asking $70 total for the two.  Paid $205 to the Orioles as a season plan member.   PM me if interested.  Paypal preferred.    
    • Can't make game 1. I'll be at game 2...last time I was at a playoff game at Camden, we beat Scherzer and the Tigers.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...