Jump to content

How does Elias maintain a Top 10 farm system without high draft choices


wildcard

Recommended Posts

52 minutes ago, LookinUp said:

First, be good at drafting and developing talent. Our system has Rodriguez (11th overall), Hall (21st overall) and Mountcastle (36th). Baumann was a 3rd rounder. Akin was 54th overall. Hays was a 3rd rounder. You could argue this org has done a nice job lately. It would be nice to hit on a Jake Arrieta or two as well.

Second, acquire good talent in trades. We're hopeful on Kremer and Diaz. Others are farther away, but if we're selling, hopefully we find the right guys in return.

Third, acquire international talent. Several of the best players in the game were't even part of the draft. We're finally in that game. Who knows, maybe we already have a difference maker in this org who is just very young and under the radar. This is a stated goal of Elias, so hopefully he can do it.

Fourth, if we do contend, really try not to give up Hader, Davies and Rodriguez types unless you get true impact back. Knowing what you have in-house helps. When the time comes, I hope that Elias will be patient for a year or two and not blow his load during our first legit playoff run. It's very possible that promoting our own guys will work out much better than trading for other guys in the long run if we're as good at this drafting and developing guys as we hope.

 

 

I thought the Hader trade was fine. Keeping Norris too long was not.

The Parra trade isn’t the worst move DD made, But that is because there were so many equally bad ones.

The Miller trade was arguable. I would not have made it and I think I said so at the time( I must confess that I was a fan of the Feldman trade) but i understand why some people thought it was a fair price to pay. Those damn Royals, grrr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Philip said:

I thought the Hader trade was fine. Keeping Norris too long was not.

The Parra trade isn’t the worst move DD made, But that is because there were so many equally bad ones.

The Miller trade was arguable. I would not have made it and I think I said so at the time( I must confess that I was a fan of the Feldman trade) but i understand why some people thought it was a fair price to pay. Those damn Royals, grrr.

Giving up a first round pick ++ for Norris was terrible.  Two pitch nothing special guy who wasn't cheap.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Philip said:

I think they should make it eight years from the time you’re signed, 9 years for HS kids, which would eliminate any service time BS.

This kind of thing should never happen:

Carlos Ruiz transactions

December 4, 1998: Signed by the Philadelphia Phillies as an amateur free agent.

October 31, 2013: Granted Free Agency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

He could always quit.

That was the stock answer to every player prior to 1975.  You're playing baseball for $16,000 a year, stop complaining you ingrate.  We only cut your pay $1000 a year for your batting average going down eight points.  You could go home and work at Daddy's bait shop if you don't like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

I think Dan was 100% on board with going for a ring every year he was here.  I think he wanted to win very badly after Boston.

It must be... different... to be in a position where you're expected to win no matter the circumstances and you know with almost complete certainty that you're going to be fired (or essentially fired when your contract runs out) at some point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, having a top 10 farm system is not the goal.    Regularly supplying good talent to the major league team is the goal.    If we were to drop out of the top 10 because Mountcastle, Akin and Kremer had all graduated to the majors and were performing well, that wouldn’t worry me.    If those three graduated to the majors and were awful, now that would worry me.    

Second, regardless of whether you pick at the top of the draft or not, you have to (1) make good picks, and (2) develop the players well.    If you do that, the rankings will continue to be good and more importantly the pipeline will be good.  

I think it’s really hard to maintain an above average pipeline if you aren’t getting your share of the Latin American talent.    Elias and Perez are working on that.  Normally by now, we’d know what the J2 class of ‘20 looked like, and we’d have a completed DSL season on which to judge J2 ‘19.    It’s really anyone’s guess what we have there.    But I think by J2 ‘21 the team will no longer be at a competitive disadvantage and there won’t be any built in reason we can’t score a good class. 

Finally, as others mentioned, we need to be shrewd in trading established players for prospects at the right time and for good value.    

Honestly, the folks who write these offseason top 10 lists are just going to be making it up this Fall, without a minor league season to judge players on, no knowledge of what the J2 classes look like, and a minuscule sample of college and high school games on which to judge the 2020 draftees.     So I really don’t care where they rank us.   

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, wildcard said:

If the season ended today the O's would draft 14th.  Middle of the pack.   How does that keep Elias with a Top 10 farm system?

 

 

Did they settle on how to lay out the draft order? I thought that was still up in the air. I've heard a few different options such as combining this year's with last year's records or some type of winning percentage formula.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

It must be... different... to be in a position where you're expected to win no matter the circumstances and you know with almost complete certainty that you're going to be fired (or essentially fired when your contract runs out) at some point.

Maybe, but when they’re playing you ~ a million dollars a year, it’s ok to have a short career..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, DrungoHazewood said:

This kind of thing should never happen:

Carlos Ruiz transactions

December 4, 1998: Signed by the Philadelphia Phillies as an amateur free agent.

October 31, 2013: Granted Free Agency.

I didn’t look at the transactions, but seeing a 15 -year minor league career makes me sad. 
if the clock starts when a player is signed, it will increase the urgency to bring a guy up. Who would we have here now, if we were playing under that time line. It would also increase the number of extensions, because some guys just need extra time to get ready, and the team doesn’t want to let him go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DrungoHazewood said:

This kind of thing should never happen:

Carlos Ruiz transactions

December 4, 1998: Signed by the Philadelphia Phillies as an amateur free agent.

October 31, 2013: Granted Free Agency.

 

2 hours ago, Philip said:

I didn’t look at the transactions, but seeing a 15 -year minor league career makes me sad. 
if the clock starts when a player is signed, it will increase the urgency to bring a guy up. Who would we have here now, if we were playing under that time line. It would also increase the number of extensions, because some guys just need extra time to get ready, and the team doesn’t want to let him go.

Was not a 15 year MiLB career. Got a cup of coffee in 2006 and exceeded rookie limits in 2007. He didn't start play in the minors until 2000 in his age 21 season. Not sure of the exact math but he either used his maximum number of options or had to be exposed to the R5 at some point. 

System isn't perfect, but he wasn't a 15-year minor leaguer.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...