Jump to content

Connolly: Trade Deadline thoughts


Sports Guy

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, spiritof66 said:

Easy one. The answer is No.

I would hope not. If Elias gets a great offer for Means, you don't keep him because his bobblehead night is next month. Would also indicate the Angelos sons aren't that different then their father if a trade for Means gets nixed for a petty reason. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I would hope not. If Elias gets a great offer for Means, you don't keep him because his bobblehead night is next month. Would also indicate the Angelos sons aren't that different then their father if a trade for Means gets nixed for a petty reason. 

I wasn't implying cause and effect... at least not in that direction.   I wasn't saying that they would not make a deal because of the bobblehead night being scheduled.

I was implying the opposite -- maybe the fact they just now are adding a Means Bobblehead that wasn't in the promotion schedule previously, might indicate that they have already decided not to deal Means.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, OsFanSinceThe80s said:

I think that's a more likely scenario package Stewart (or another player) with a pitcher like Fry to net another prospect in a trade. Not that you'll land anyone great, but perhaps a high ceiling prospect that hasn't shown much in the minor leagues. 

I would expect something like that for Stewart, but I think Fry has more value than that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SteveA said:

I wasn't implying cause and effect... at least not in that direction.   I wasn't saying that they would not make a deal because of the bobblehead night being scheduled.

I was implying the opposite -- maybe the fact they just now are adding a Means Bobblehead that wasn't in the promotion schedule previously, might indicate that they have already decided not to deal Means.

That's what I thought. 

Whoever is in charge of things decided weeks ago to have these made. At most, it means there was no deal on the table back then to trade Means. And it's hard to believe a deal's being made now while he's injured and not pitching.

I'd be shocked if Elias has decided not to deal Means or anybody else. (I can imagine the Angeloses getting involved in a decision to trade Mancini.) He'll do what he decides to do without regard to the team's promotions, and apparently without regard for whether anyone will show up to watch the team he's assembling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, SteveA said:

I wasn't implying cause and effect... at least not in that direction.   I wasn't saying that they would not make a deal because of the bobblehead night being scheduled.

I was implying the opposite -- maybe the fact they just now are adding a Means Bobblehead that wasn't in the promotion schedule previously, might indicate that they have already decided not to deal Means.

Got it. I don't see the trade market being great for Means, but I just don't want it to be ownership will refuse to trade Means because it's his bobblehead night in August. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Part 2:

https://theathletic.com/2663500/2021/06/28/could-the-orioles-trade-trey-mancini-a-panel-of-former-gms-discuss-what-theyd-do/?source=user_shared_article
 

The 4 GMs think highly of Trey and all agree that it’s a tough PR move to trade him but doesn’t mean they wouldn’t if the right deal is there.

Here is what they say about his trade value:

 

What would be a reasonable return for Mancini in this market?

Duquette: The return is a little more limited with these types of players. Unless he’s definitely a 30-homer, 100-RBI guy. He’s got a year and a half left, so I think this is the year that you could maximize the most for him. I think you could get two prospects, one would be a Top 5 and another might be a Top 10 and then you could probably get another one that’s Top 20 or something like that. You could probably get three guys back.

Evans: Mike has been drafting and signing and developing the lower part of the system so, just in general at the deadline this year, you’re trying to get guys who are ready to help you. Maybe not, in this case, would they have to be major-league ready, but you want them to be very close. And you really want somebody whose projection, as far as you’re concerned, has a very high ceiling. So, a higher-ceiling guy in this case. If you’re going to listen, someone is going to have to impress you with some high-ceiling return.

O’Dowd: If I could find a young player, for me, a corner bat … that I can get more service-time control from and I feel is going to be a very similar producer that Trey is at the big-league level, of course. But I’m setting a high price on this one, and if I’m not getting it, I’m really working hard this winter to try and extend this guy.

Bowden: I’ve got to have back two Top 10 prospects from an average farm system 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How attractive is Trey Mancini on this year’s trade market?

Duquette: He’s attractive, for sure. At first base, he’d probably be above-average in terms of other first basemen available. As an outfielder, he would probably be middle of the pack as to what’s available. But if you’re looking at him as a multi-position guy, first, left, DH, a quality individual, a right-handed bat with power, has the ability to hit, a clubhouse presence, I mean, it’s hard to make better human beings than Trey.

Evans: I think he is going to be hugely attractive. I think he is as attractive as any (Oriole) mentioned for me. He is a guy that could slot right into a major-league club and you’re not taking on three or four years of control. It’s a much more typical trade-deadline deal. He is going to be a player that is going to be much more sought after because of where he is, not only with his performance but where he is with service time. He appears to be, from the outside bidder, perhaps a little bit more attainable.

O’Dowd: I think he is pretty attractive in the marketplace. There are a lot of clubs looking for that kind of bat that they can hit in the middle of the lineup. Probably more American League than National League because, if you don’t have a first-base opening for him, you could DH him. But I think he is one of the more underrated players in our game. He’s got a good strike zone awareness, good bat-to-ball skills and the power is there. I would listen, but I really would have to get back an impact player for me to move him because he is more important to the Orioles process right now than he is maybe to somebody else just evaluating his talent in a vacuum.

Bowden: He’s the best position player on the Orioles. If somebody asked me, “Who is Mancini offensively?” I would say .300-30-100 year in and year out. He’s an impact, middle-of-the-order three-hole hitter or two-hole hitter. Makeup off the charts. Overcame cancer. Dealt with chemotherapy, doesn’t eat Lucky Charms anymore, which I know is tough. It’s not easy when you have to give that up, because I love the marshmallows as much as he does. I’ve always loved this player. I’ve always loved the bat. What I would like to do is extend him. If I can’t extend him, then I have to listen. Because his trade value will never be higher than it will be July 30. I’m going to use the July 30 trade deadline as leverage to try and do a long-term deal with Trey.

 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Moose Milligan said:

Didn't know Bowden smokes weed.

The market for Mancini will be interesting over the next month.  I can see it both ways, I can see him definitely being traded...I can also see him being kept.  

There's a reason why Bowden works as a tv/radio analyst now and not as the the GM of a baseball team. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bowden: He’s the best position player on the Orioles. If somebody asked me, “Who is Mancini offensively?” I wouldsay .300-30-100 year in and year out.
 

Interesting since Trey has never batted .300 or had 100 RBI’s and he’s hit 30 homers exactly once. I’d say Bowden doesn’t know what he’s talking about.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Bowden: He’s the best position player on the Orioles. If somebody asked me, “Who is Mancini offensively?” I wouldsay .300-30-100 year in and year out.
 

Interesting since Trey has never batted .300 or had 100 RBI’s and he’s hit 30 homers exactly once. I’d say Bowden doesn’t know what he’s talking about.  

Well he is on pace for 30/100 again this year I believe.  I can see why someone would label him that.

Not sure why he said 300 but he is a solid hitter, especially in today’s game.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Good point, no other metropolitan area has more than one team.
    • Could it be that they allowed the Gnats to reside within 30 minutes of their home. Effectively cutting their market in half? 
    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...