Jump to content

(Edit: Orioles get 1st pick after walkoff homer by Diamondbacks)


Greenpastures23

Recommended Posts

I'll also say this:  to watch this team be as bad as they are each day...I dunno, I'm kind of numb to it.  Like I expected this team to win anywhere between 45 and 55 games.  I certainly didn't expect a 19 game losing streak.

So, it's a bad team.  A very, very bad team.  But, like...to look around at the standings and see ANOTHER team that I don't pay attention to and see how bad THEY are from an outsider's perspective, it's like...damn, they SUCK!  All the while not acknowledging that they're just as bad as we are.  

I don't really know how to describe it.  It's just a general feeling that when you see another team with just over 40 wins, how bad that is.  And then the realization that your team is just that bad, too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if Texas and Pittsburgh execs can believe that there are TWO teams that are actually way worse than theirs.  To have 4 teams in the league that could easily lose 100+ games is pretty impressive.  Of course it is only possible when none of them occupy the same division since the 19 head to head games would practically eliminate the possibility of having two teams in the same division that are both that bad.

It isn't like Arizona gets blown out a lot.  They are somewhat competitive.  They just have an incredible and almost impressive knack for losing games.  I feel like they were predicted to win 75 games or around that heading into the season.  To maybe get to 50 is really "impressive" from an underachievement standpoint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, JR Oriole said:

I wonder if Texas and Pittsburgh execs can believe that there are TWO teams that are actually way worse than theirs.  To have 4 teams in the league that could easily lose 100+ games is pretty impressive.  Of course it is only possible when none of them occupy the same division since the 19 head to head games would practically eliminate the possibility of having two teams in the same division that are both that bad.

It isn't like Arizona gets blown out a lot.  They are somewhat competitive.  They just have an incredible and almost impressive knack for losing games.  I feel like they were predicted to win 75 games or around that heading into the season.  To maybe get to 50 is really "impressive" from an underachievement standpoint.

See: 2018 Orioles.   

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JR Oriole said:

I wonder if Texas and Pittsburgh execs can believe that there are TWO teams that are actually way worse than theirs. 

The Pirates have a -205 run differential despite having the 10th easiest schedule in baseball and a team in their division that completely gutted their roster at the deadline. They are thrilled that the O's and Dbacks are taking the brunt of the anti tanking discourse despite the fact that they might actually have a worse team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LTO's said:

The Pirates have a -205 run differential despite having the 10th easiest schedule in baseball and a team in their division that completely gutted their roster at the deadline. They are thrilled that the O's and Dbacks are taking the brunt of the anti tanking discourse despite the fact that they might actually have a worse team. 

But I think they make a great case for being in better long term shape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

But I think they make a great case for being in better long term shape.

I mean the AL East has 4 90+ game winners and every team except the Yankees is in the top 10 farm system rankings released by BA. The NL Central isn't anywhere near that. I would much rather be in their position but they don't have more talent in their system than the Orioles do. Their Pythagorean W-L is the same as ours. They are unquestionably on the same level of suck as this roster. I highly doubt they'd be confident they'd win a 19 game series against us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LTO's said:

I mean the AL East has 4 90+ game winners and every team except the Yankees is in the top 10 farm system rankings released by BA. The NL Central isn't anywhere near that. I would much rather be in their position but they don't have more talent in their system than the Orioles do. Their Pythagorean W-L is the same as ours. They are unquestionably on the same level of suck as this roster. I highly doubt they'd be confident they'd win a 19 game series against us. 

Well the division matters and they have a lot of talent in their system, not to mention a guy like Hayes in the majors.  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Well the division matters and they have a lot of talent in their system, not to mention a guy like Hayes in the majors.  
 

 

Ok....which is why I said I'd rather be in their position. That's really a function of luck though. Predictive measures have their roster on the same level as ours and no evaluators have their farm system ahead of ours so if we were both in the NL Central, I'd rather have our talent. Their owner is also significantly cheaper than the Angelos family. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LTO's said:

Ok....which is why I said I'd rather be in their position. That's really a function of luck though. Predictive measures have their roster on the same level as ours and no evaluators have their farm system ahead of ours so if we were both in the NL Central, I'd rather have our talent. Their owner is also significantly cheaper than the Angelos family. 

Well we don’t know what the ownership of the Orioles will be going forward in terms of spending money.

I would bet on the Pirates system being rated ahead of ours very soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Well we don’t know what the ownership of the Orioles will be going forward in terms of spending money.

Ok and what about Pirates ownership? Go ask their fans what they think. I'm pretty confident they won't be outspending the Orioles year after year. There is no evidence that will happen. Way more evidence the opposite will happen despite your contrarianism.

4 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I would bet on the Pirates system being rated ahead of ours very soon.

Maybe. But I doubt it will be by a substantial amount at all at least for the next year or two. In any event the O's are getting ready to promote a 70 FV and a 60 FV to the big league roster. The Pirates don't have a single prospect in their system rated that highly. Hayes, no longer a prospect, was the closest and he may be a great player but there's chatter that his ceiling was inflated last year as some serious warts at the plate have showed up for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, NelsonCruuuuuz said:

Arizona now has the number 1 pick.

Dang, I was afraid that miracle win would carry a hidden cost. Like the year (I forget) we had one too many rare wins in Sept and lost the chance for, was it Teixeira?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Sports Guy said:

Well we don’t know what the ownership of the Orioles will be going forward in terms of spending money.

I would bet on the Pirates system being rated ahead of ours very soon.

It would only be temporary, due mostly to losing Adley and GrayRod (and perhaps Baumann, Stowers) to graduation next year.

I'd bet money on the O's farm system being rated ahead of the Pirates for offseason 2023 and beyond. Elias has been crushing his hitter draft picks, making smart trades to pick up young international players, developing pitching in a subtle manner in the lower levels of the minors, and developing our international presence.

The amount of talent we have at low A right now is pretty crazy. Love to see it.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...