Jump to content

Seems like OPACY was more hitter-friendly than ever this year


Frobby

Recommended Posts

Okay, maybe not “ever,” because I only looked at the last 10 years.   But right now, with three road games to play, our offense has scored 74 more runs at home than on the road, while allowing 86 more at home than on the road.   That’s a 160 differential; the final differential figures to be in the +115 to + 140 range.   The highest differential in the last 10 years was +113, for the 2012 Orioles.   Here’s a breakdown by year (RS differential, RA differential, total differential):

2012: +62, +51, +113

2013: +19, +21, +40

2014: -23, -23, -46

2015: +87, +5, +92

2016: +8, -43, -35

2017: +47, -27, +20

2018: +56, -70, -14

2019: -11, +83, +72

2020: +22, +59, +81 (projected for 162 games)

The homer differential this year is really drastic; the O’s have hit 122 at home, 70 on the road, while allowing 155 at home, 92 on the road.  

It’s a tough place to pitch, no doubt about it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Yankees hit 20 homers at OPACY, next highest road park was 9.

The Red Sox hit 19 homers at OPACY, next highest road park was 11.

The Rays hit 25 homers at OPACY, next highest road park was 13.

The Jays were more equal opportunity, hitting 21 homers at OPACY, Yankee Stadium and Fenway.   

That’s 85 homers against us at OPACY by the AL East teams in 38 games, compared to 70 hit by our other opponents in 43 games.   
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In regards to how homer-happy the stadium is, I think you need to look at the no-doubters...the ones that would leave any park.  I know they keep track of this, I just don't know where to look for it.

And then look at the homers given up that would be out of 50% of parks, 25% of parks, etc.  

But overall, if we had better pitching, we wouldn't be giving up as many homers.  I know Camden Yards is a small park that's offense friendly but I'm betting a lot of homers given up by our pitchers would be out in most parks.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

In regards to how homer-happy the stadium is, I think you need to look at the no-doubters...the ones that would leave any park.  I know they keep track of this, I just don't know where to look for it.

And then look at the homers given up that would be out of 50% of parks, 25% of parks, etc.  

But overall, if we had better pitching, we wouldn't be giving up as many homers.  I know Camden Yards is a small park that's offense friendly but I'm betting a lot of homers given up by our pitchers would be out in most parks.  

True, but that doesn’t explain allowing 155 homers at home and only 92 on the road.   It’s the same lousy pitchers (more or less).    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Frobby said:

True, but that doesn’t explain allowing 155 homers at home and only 92 on the road.   It’s the same lousy pitchers (more or less).    

How many pitches thrown at home vs. the road?  Again, not sure where to look.  

You're probably right, Camden Yards is a bandbox.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

How many pitches thrown at home vs. the road?  Again, not sure where to look.  

Now that is a split I’ve never seen.   I do know that at present, our opponents have had 3217 PA at OPACY, 2908 in their home parks (figure that gap will close by 100-120 this weekend).   It stands to reason that the PA are higher at OPACY, because the better a team hits, the more PA they get.   So, my assumption would be the pitch count is higher too.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Frobby said:

Now that is a split I’ve never seen.   I do know that at present, our opponents have had 3217 PA at OPACY, 2908 in their home parks (figure that gap will close by 100-120 this weekend).   It stands to reason that the PA are higher at OPACY, because the better a team hits, the more PA they get.   So, my assumption would be the pitch count is higher too.   

That's still not enough of a gap to justify 155 homers at home vs. 92 on the road.  Even if you were to take the average pitch per plate appearance and figure that into the difference between 3217 and 2908, I don't think that justifies a 60~ homer gap.  

Dunno, just thinking out loud.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moose Milligan said:

That's still not enough of a gap to justify 155 homers at home vs. 92 on the road.  Even if you were to take the average pitch per plate appearance and figure that into the difference between 3217 and 2908, I don't think that justifies a 60~ homer gap.  

No, I think the gap is largely the ballpark.   It’s always been homer-friendly, but it seems more extreme than usual this year.  Mullins has 22 of his 30 homers at home; Mountcastle 22 of 33; Santander 15 of 18.    In addition to having 122 homers at home vs. 70 on the road, the O’s have a .760/.652 OPS split home vs. road.   

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Frobby said:

True, but that doesn’t explain allowing 155 homers at home and only 92 on the road.   It’s the same lousy pitchers (more or less).    

The O's have 53 road losses and 54 home losses. Since this team is pretty bad, I'm assuming most of those road games are ending after the top of the ninth. That's only eight innings usually pitched by the the Orioles when they are losing on the road. So, you're talking about a guesstimate of about 50 fewer innings pitched by a crappy bullpen on the road versus Camden Yards.

I'd also be interested in how the weather this year might have impacted things. I felt like it was a more humid and hot summer than normal - which might contribute to things.

Overall though - you're right. Camden Yards as a whole seems more homer happy than normal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Porky said:

The O's have 53 road losses and 54 home losses. Since this team is pretty bad, I'm assuming most of those road games are ending after the top of the ninth. That's only eight innings usually pitched by the the Orioles when they are losing on the road. So, you're talking about a guesstimate of about 50 fewer innings pitched by a crappy bullpen on the road versus Camden Yards.

This is a good point, regarding our opponents taking less at bats in their home park vs. OPACY.    Of course, the reverse also is true (though not as extreme) - the O’s bat in the 9th more often on the road than at home.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Frobby said:

No, I think the gap is largely the ballpark.   It’s always been homer-friendly, but it seems more extreme than usual this year.  Mullins has 22 of his 30 homers at home; Mountcastle 22 of 33; Santander 15 of 18.    In addition to having 122 homers at home vs. 70 on the road, the O’s have a .760/.652 OPS split home vs. road.   

It is an unusual anomaly in the statistics, but did anything change at OPACY that would explain this? Looking at the yearly splits maybe something is different in 2021, but the 2019 Orioles pitcher gave up 45 more home runs at OPACY. 

If this trend repeats next year or remains the same when the pitching staff improves, then I'm more inclined to read more into this year's home run splits.

Orioles Hitters Home Run Splits

2016 Home: 131 Road: 122

2017 Home: 135 Road: 97

2018 Home: 100 Road: 88

2019 Home: 114 Road: 99

2020 Home: 45 Road: 32

2021 Home: 122 Road: 70

Orioles Pitcher Home Run Splits

2016 Home: 88 Road: 95

2017 Home: 127 Road: 115

2018 Home: 123 Road: 111

2019 Home: 175 Road: 130

2020 Home: 43 Road: 36

2021 Home: 155 Road: 92

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
    • Elias has only been in rebuild mode with the O's so there's not much to speculate on there.  Houston, where he spent his formative years, doesn't seem to like to be on the hook for more than a couple of big long-term contracts at any given time.  I can see that as being Elias' choice as well, albeit with a lower overall cost - Houston runs a big payroll.  But it's all guesswork.  I really don't know. If Elias takes the 2025 payroll to $150 million it will creep up to $200 million or so by 2028 just from keeping the core together.  That's where I start to wonder about sustainability due to market size, economic forces, etc., etc., etc... If it were up to me, I would add a couple of free agents this offseason even if the contracts were longer than ideal and be conservative about extensions elsewhere until the prospects establish themselves a little better.  I think there's a competitive opportunity that the team is already into that's worth exploiting. I think ownership is very happy to have Elias on board and they're not inclined to force him to do anything.  I also think Rubenstein's demonstrated business prowess is great enough to assume that he has had plenty enough time to come to a mutual understanding with Elias as to goals.
    • We need a RH O’hearn…in addition to Westburg. At least 3 batters that will push up the pitch count and cause damage in the top 5 of the lineup.
    • Boy,  that Jackson Merrill is a good young player that is playing his best ball down the season stretch and in the playoffs.   He's only 21.  I guess some young guys are able to play up to the pressure.   Who could have guessed that?
    • I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.
    • What agreement? The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...