Jump to content

Markakis extension on hold


Hank Scorpio

Recommended Posts

Haven't we read / been told that they've are both fine with six years?

I'd actually rather us do 7 years.

The only thing we have seen, to my knowledge, is that we offered him 6 years last week.

No idea what Nick wants...Maybe he wants 5 years...maybe he wants 7 years...Who knows?

Judging by him wanting to wait and things like that, i think 6-7 years is likely though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 229
  • Created
  • Last Reply
If you include the signing bonus and buyout, Rios is making 57 million for the first 6 years of the deal...We have to beat that.

One thing to point out is that Rios was in a slightly different situation, because he previously had been a super-two and was going into his second year of arbitration eligibility when he signed his deal. For that reason, it's probable that he would have made more money in his three remaining arbitration-eligible years than Nick would have made, due to seniority, even though Nick may be the better player. You also have to factor in that the two extra years on his deal are relatively cheap.

With all that said, if I have to give Nick slightly more than Rios got in order to close the deal, then that's what I'd do.

What I don't understand is why you are blaming the Orioles for the impasse, when all we know right now is that the O's have made a reasonable offer (not necessarily enough to conclude the deal, but at least in the general vicinity) and we have no idea what Nick has demanded. If the O's are at 6/$60 mm and Nick is at 6/$80 mm, that's one thing; if the O's are at 6/$50 mm and Nick is at 6/$65 mm that's something else entirely. Unless you know the specifics, I don't know how you can say the O's are at fault for not closing a deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven't we read / been told that they've are both fine with six years?

I'd actually rather us do 7 years.

Me too. Nick will be quite young when he reaches free agency. In that 7th year he'll be 31 years old. What I'd REALLY like is a couple of option years, even if they are at a pretty high price.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing to point out is that Rios was in a slightly different situation, because he previously had been a super-two and was going into his second year of arbitration eligibility when he signed his deal. For that reason, it's probable that he would have made more money in his three remaining arbitration-eligible years than Nick would have made, due to seniority, even though Nick may be the better player. You also have to factor in that the two extra years on his deal are relatively cheap.

With all that said, if I have to give Nick slightly more than Rios got in order to close the deal, then that's what I'd do.

What I don't understand is why you are blaming the Orioles for the impasse, when all we know right now is that the O's have made a reasonable offer (not necessarily enough to conclude the deal, but at least in the general vicinity) and we have no idea what Nick has demanded. If the O's are at 6/$60 mm and Nick is at 6/$80 mm, that's one thing; if the O's are at 6/$50 mm and Nick is at 6/$65 mm that's something else entirely. Unless you know the specifics, I don't know how you can say the O's are at fault for not closing a deal.

I fault them for the BS offer in July and I fault them for not putting enough money on the table right now.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fault them for the BS offer in July and I fault them for not putting enough money on the table right now.

I agree about the BS offer in July. We don't have enough solid information to judge the offer out there right now. "Believed to be between $50 and $60 mm" is not very specific.

Put it this way - if July had never happened, an opening offer of 6 years, $50 mm would not have embarassed me. I wouldn't expect that to close the deal, but it's a definite starting point for a negotiation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree about the BS offer in July. We don't have enough solid information to judge the offer out there right now. "Believed to be between $50 and $60 mm" is not very specific.

Put it this way - if July had never happened, an opening offer of 6 years, $50 mm would not have embarassed me. I wouldn't expect that to close the deal, but it's a definite starting point for a negotiation.

The deal is believed to be between 50-60 million....I would be surprised if that means more than 55 million.

That is probably 7-10 million away from being a realisitic offer...and when I say realistic i mean realistic in terms of him accepting it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The deal is believed to be between 50-60 million....I would be surprised if that means more than 55 million.

That is probably 7-10 million away from being a realisitic offer...and when I say realistic i mean realistic in terms of him accepting it.

Well, I don't think an offer that is within 13-18% of where you hope to end up is a bad place to be before you've heard the other side's position.

I'm curious - you are a diamond seller. When I bought my wife's engagement ring, I can tell you that the initial price the seller offered me was far more than 18% higher than the price I eventually agreed to pay.

Now I realize baseball players and diamonds are two different markets, and not all markets follow the same negotiation pattern. But I don't think you start negotiations by using the most lucrative deal any comparable player has ever signed and beating it by several million dollars. Maybe you finish there, but you don't start there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I don't think an offer that is within 13-18% of where you hope to end up is a bad place to be before you've heard the other side's position.

I'm curious - you are a diamond seller. When I bought my wife's engagement ring, I can tell you that the initial price the seller offered me was far more than 18% higher than the price I eventually agreed to pay.

Now I realize baseball players and diamonds are two different markets, and not all markets follow the same negotiation pattern. But I don't think you start negotiations by using the most lucrative deal any comparable player has ever signed and beating it by several million dollars. Maybe you finish there, but you don't start there.

I usually give the person one price...the one they pay.

I can do that because I am far cheaper than everyone else and our reputation for being the cheapest(most of our customers are from referrals) is always there...people don't really question us.

Sometimes I have to work with them because of budget and things like that but for the most part, all I have to say is go shop elsewhere(I always encourage that) and then if/when they do, they always come back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If MacPhail really offered him a deal like this, I'm going to be irate. There is no plausible defense for why someone with any sense would do something this stupid. I truly hope this information is wrong.

Yea...Pretty bad isn't it?

We heard it was a low ball offer, so I would guess that is accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I usually give the person one price...the one they pay.

I can do that because I am far cheaper than everyone else and our reputation for being the cheapest

Well, then you and the Orioles have something in common -- you're both the cheapest! :D

Yea...Pretty bad isn't it?

We heard it was a low ball offer, so I would guess that is accurate.

I really think that sounds too low to be believed. Maybe if that offer (1) included re-doing his 2008 contract, and (2) only covered 1 year of free agency, those numbers could come close to making sense. Otherwise, impossible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, then you and the Orioles have something in common -- you're both the cheapest! :D

I really think that sounds too low to be believed. Maybe if that offer (1) included re-doing his 2008 contract, and (2) only covered 1 year of free agency, those numbers could come close to making sense. Otherwise, impossible.

Let's say the offer was 5/36..

1st year: 3 million

2nd year: 5 million

3rd year: 8 million

4th year: 10 million

5th year: 10 million

That is something AM may have felt he "should" sign.

I think it could be realistic that he offered it...Again, we heard that the offer was a low ball offer...To say it is a low ball offer, it would have to be something like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If MacPhail really offered him a deal like this, I'm going to be irate. There is no plausible defense for why someone with any sense would do something this stupid. I truly hope this information is wrong.

Man, if that's true, we're in for another long decade, my friends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • Posts

    • I can’t emphasize enough how stupid that rain delay was.  No rain at all for 45 minutes, then two hours of light mist, the kind that teams play through all the time.  I was standing near the kids play area during most of the delay and believe me, that rain didn’t deter any kids from using the playground equipment for two hours. Then, 15 minutes before the game is going to start, the grounds crew is watering the infield.  What? The game itself was not worth the wait, needless to say.   But what annoys me most is the complete lack of communication during these delays.  How about letting the fans who are there know what the thinking is about how long the delay will be?  How about an update every 30 minutes or so.   Nope, nothing.   Just a generic message on the scoreboard saying that the start of the game will be delayed to to the “threat” of inclement weather.   My phone was showing .05” of rain expected in the next six hours.  Some threat! On the bright side, the team did announce that ticket holders would be given vouchers that could be used for a Monday - Thursday game.  That was the least they could do.       
    • 19,286 for that rain-delayed mess of a game.  I’d say about 2/3 of those stuck through the 3 hour delay and were in their seats at game time.  
    • And paid Scherzer, and Zimmerman, and Corbin, and Werth.   They didn’t all work out, but nobody could say the Nats didn’t spend to put a winning team on the field during their run.  The run basically ended because Stras II and Corbin blew up in their face.   But there’s always 2019.   
    • I can’t believe that 8 hours after Grayson stepped off the mound, I’m the first person to update his thread.   After a 19-day IL stint and without a rehab stint, Grayson threw 6 innings of one-hit shutout ball last night.  The one hit was an infield squibber hit 59.5 mph off the bat.  His command was a tad shaky at times, as he walked three and hit a batter, but he still breezed through 6 innings on 82 pitches, 50 for strikes.  If it hadn’t been his first outing in three weeks, he certainly could have pitched the 7th inning.  Unfortunately, the bullpen blew it for him. Fastball topped out at 98.4 and he was still hitting 97 in his final inning.  
    • I think half of Fangraphs’ staff over the years came from Lookout Landing.   I rarely read other teams’ sites, but I agree Pinstripe Alley is one of the best Yankee sites.     
    • For one thing, they don’t have Bautista shutting things down in the 9th inning or extra innings.   Second, 30-16 just doesn’t happen every year.  I’m actually pretty encouraged that the O’s have played .650 baseball without winning a disproportionate number of close games.    
    • Four more shutout innings for Chace last night, 2 hits, 3 walks, 6 strikeouts.   His ERA is 0.91, WHiP 1.21, K/9 12.7.   The only blemish is his 5.2 BB/9.   He’s pitched 8 games and has only allowed runs in two of them.   Yesterday he threw 45 of 68 pitches for strikes.  For some reason the O’s kind of have him under wraps, as he’s only been allowed to exceed 70 pitches twice, back in April.  He’s also been kept to four inning outings.  They’re clearly being very careful with the 20-year old (turns 21 in three weeks).  In fairness, they did need to shut him down for a month late last summer, so I’m guessing it’s more season load management than game-by-game decisions.   In any event, it’s been a promising campaign for Chace.    
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...