Jump to content

Jud Fabian


Recommended Posts

It has been said that the Orioles were poised to take the college CF at #42 and had tentatively agreed to an overslot bonus of 3M.  When Boston picked him at #41, they offered slot and Fabian turned them down.  I don't believe Fabian is in play for the top pick BUT I have to wonder what happens if he slides to their next draft position. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm still shocked that Fabian didn't sign for slot at #41. He's lost his leverage now that he's a Senior, and he has such a boom-or-bust batting profile that he's going to have to stay hot all season to really get attention, especially with the depth of high level outfielders in the '22 draft class. 

I agree with those that say never draft for need, take the best player available, but Fabian at 2-1 (do we have a competitive balance pick this year? I can't remember) seems like adding to depth in the OF when we have alot of other holes (i.e. pitching)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CharmCityHokie said:

I'm still shocked that Fabian didn't sign for slot at #41. He's lost his leverage now that he's a Senior, and he has such a boom-or-bust batting profile that he's going to have to stay hot all season to really get attention, especially with the depth of high level outfielders in the '22 draft class. 

I agree with those that say never draft for need, take the best player available, but Fabian at 2-1 (do we have a competitive balance pick this year? I can't remember) seems like adding to depth in the OF when we have alot of other holes (i.e. pitching)

If the story is true the Orioles might have had something to do with it.

If you are told you are worth 3M by one team and another team only offers you $1,856,700 I can see how that might have an impact.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

If the story is true the Orioles might have had something to do with it.

If you are told you are worth 3M by one team and another team only offers you $1,856,700 I can see how that might have an impact.

 

1 hour ago, Can_of_corn said:

If the story is true the Orioles might have had something to do with it.

If you are told you are worth 3M by one team and another team only offers you $1,856,700 I can see how that might have an impact.

Why offer him overslot unless he had a number in mind to keep him from going back to school?  Seems odd that the O's would start at that number 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

 

Why offer him overslot unless he had a number in mind to keep him from going back to school?  Seems odd that the O's would start at that number 

I'm sure he had a number.

That doesn't mean that it might not have been easier to talk him down off of that number if he hadn't been told (allegedly) that the O's would go that high.

That's all I'm saying and all I'm going to say.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

I'm sure he had a number.

That doesn't mean that it might not have been easier to talk him down off of that number if he hadn't been told (allegedly) that the O's would go that high.

That's all I'm saying and all I'm going to say.

Actually it looks like a case of the Orioles doing their homework and the Red Sox not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jud enrolled at UF in Spring 2019 after graduating early from HS. He has played 1.5 years of college baseball and will not be 22 yoa until 9/27. He is a COVID junior this season, so he did not give up his leverage as someone suggested. He bet on himself, sure. We’ll see how it turns out. He also gets to play with his brother this season, which is special for Jud and his family. 

He certainly needs to make more contact, but the BB rate is not bad. There is legit CF tools and power there. I would point out that all of the UF hitters had serious issues in 2021, not just Jud. My son played with and against many of these kids, but I have not had an opportunity to ask them this year.

If it is true that the Orioles were going to draft him, based on what we know about Elias and co, they must have seen a swing alteration and/or a way to improve his swing decisions. His fly-ball/ground-ball rate was pretty high as well.

The only thing I find to be a negative, and it is a superstition, an unwritten baseball axiom, is that he is a LH thrower and RH bat. For whatever reason, that failure of that profile is a weird thing that gets brought up because so few players excel with that profile. I hope he proves that to be a silly thought.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Jammer7 said:

The only thing I find to be a negative, and it is a superstition, an unwritten baseball axiom, is that he is a LH thrower and RH bat. For whatever reason, that failure of that profile is a weird thing that gets brought up because so few players excel with that profile. I hope he proves that to be a silly thought.

I know that's a rare combo but had never heard it superstition-bad.   I know there have only been a handful* in baseball history, but I always kind of imagined it good in case you get a 1-in-a-handful chance at Rickey Henderson.

*Pitchers pretending to "bat" don't count towards handful calculation.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

I know that's a rare combo but had never heard it superstition-bad.   I know there have only been a handful* in baseball history, but I always kind of imagined it good in case you get a 1-in-a-handful chance at Rickey Henderson.

*Pitchers pretending to "bat" don't count towards handful calculation.

The only reason I brought this up was I heard and read this on his from some lesser outlets. I find it anecdotal, at best. It was something I heard old school baseball guys talk about years ago. Rickey is the first one I bring up, but it is odd that there isn't many. Joey Rickard was one Oriole who came to mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Just Regular said:

I know that's a rare combo but had never heard it superstition-bad.   I know there have only been a handful* in baseball history, but I always kind of imagined it good in case you get a 1-in-a-handful chance at Rickey Henderson.

*Pitchers pretending to "bat" don't count towards handful calculation.

Joey Rickard jumps out at me but I would guess "failure" in his case right?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bobmc said:

Joey Rickard jumps out at me but I would guess "failure" in his case right?

He has a few years on an MLB roster, so for me, Joey is not a failure for what was spent/invested on him. If we spent a high round pick on him, or something like that, then yeah, I guess.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
    • Which core players beside Adley Rutschman struggled?
    • The entire commentary on Hyde and the team seems odd but have to admit there does seem to be something off.   Team seemed adrift for most of the 2nd half.  A very talented team went off the rails midway through the season mostly due to core players struggling and rookies not performing or filling in adequately for a few injured starters.    None of the position player trade line acquisitions performed that well.     Hyde seemed in over his head or at a loss on how to correct things, but he must have convinced Elias that he has a plan to fix things.  Curious to see what happens with the coaching staff.  
    • And or give up picks for QO pitchers 
    • They've averaged 92 wins a year the last 3 years in the most difficult environment in the sport with basically the greatest disadvantages in the sport. Something tells me they know a hell of a lot more about this than you do.    
    • Not when they aren't worthy. At minimum the hitting coaches should be el gonezo
    • That is the sign of a stable and successful organization.  Firing people.  Who could argue that?
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...