Jump to content

The 28-man roster will be as follows IMO :)


interloper

Recommended Posts

1. Means
2. Lyles
3. Zimmermann
4. Kremer
5. T.Wells

6. Lowther (paired with Wells)
7.  Lopez
8. Scott
9. Fry
10. Perez
11. Sulser
12. Tate
13. Krehbiel
14. Baumann
15. Baker

16. C Chirinos
17. 1B Mountcastle
18. 2B Urias
19. SS Mateo
20. 3B Gutierrez
21. LF Hays
22. CF Mullins
23. RF Santander
24. DH Mancini

25. C2 Bemboom
26. OF McKenna
27. IF/OF Owings
28. IF Martin
 

Akin - Optioned so he can figure out his terrible command.
Odor - Released because he can only play 1 position, allows Martin to be added to 40-man.
Stewart - Optioned. I think the team wants him on the bench for his lefty bat, but they'll ultimately decide on an extra pitcher instead.
Gillaspie or Mattson - DFA'd so Bemboom can be added to 40-man.
Bautista - Treated like all the other top pitching prospects and optioned to check that AAA box. 
Stowers - Optioned. Elias basically said as much recently. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The biggest question mark for me is Baker, who we know is still in camp and (I think) throwing on the side like Baumann. Maybe we start to see him and Baumann more in this last week, but it's tough to call some of those extra bullpen arms right now. Ellis and Watkins aren't on the 40-man and I think adding them is dangerous because it means removing a more talented, younger player. 

There aren't a ton of guys I feel instantly fine about DFAing on the 40-man right now. True fodder types. Which is great! Mattson is one for sure, and it's unlikely he gets claimed since he's injured/behind. Gillaspie I think now that the Rule 5 isn't a thing, they can maybe slip him through. If he gets claimed it's not the end of the world IMO. Kind of a project guy. Stewart seems safe because he has options and bats lefty and they're going to need some coverage in the OF with 2 injury-prone guys out there, 1 of whom may be traded. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Tony-OH said:

I'm assuming you just forgot Bautista? He pitched in the 4th inning today and has yet to be scored on. I can't imagine him not making the team and could be in high leverage situations.

Nope, didn't forget. Optioned to AAA. He hasn't pitched there yet and we know how Mike rolls. [EDIT: Woops, that's incorrect...]

I think Bautista will "check some boxes" as Mike likes to say, and be up pretty quickly. But he'll want him to ease into the season at AAA and go with pitchers who are more multi-inning types to start the season since guys aren't built all the way up. 

I hope I'm wrong!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, if I could pick one area I think there's a good chance I'm wrong, it's the Odor/Martin thing. To me it makes so much sense having a guy like Richie on the bench, especially since he's been hitting. But I could see the O's trying out Odor for a few weeks to see if there's anything there. It really messes with being able to play Urias and Mateo at their best positions though, because it means one of them has to play 3B. And with Gutierrez and Owings playing well, Odor just doesn't make much sense to me. 

But I won't be surprised if Odor is on the team to start. Unlike a minor league signing, releasing Odor is flushing the ML minimum down the drain. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, interloper said:

Nope, didn't forget. Optioned to AAA. He hasn't pitched there yet and we know how Mike rolls. 

I think Bautista will "check some boxes" as Mike likes to say, and be up pretty quickly. But he'll want him to ease into the season at AAA and go with pitchers who are more multi-inning types to start the season since guys aren't built all the way up. 

I hope I'm wrong!

He made 17 appearances for Norfolk last year, more than he did at any other level. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, interloper said:

Honestly, if I could pick one area I think there's a good chance I'm wrong, it's the Odor/Martin thing. To me it makes so much sense having a guy like Richie on the bench, especially since he's been hitting. But I could see the O's trying out Odor for a few weeks to see if there's anything there. It really messes with being able to play Urias and Mateo at their best positions though, because it means one of them has to play 3B. And with Gutierrez and Owings playing well, Odor just doesn't make much sense to me. 

But I won't be surprised if Odor is on the team to start. Unlike a minor league signing, releasing Odor is flushing the ML minimum down the drain. 

Just a gut feeling, but wouldn't be at all surprised to see the O' release Odor in the next few days.  He's just not showing me anything positive in Spring Training.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why Kremer over Lowther, Baumann, and Akin? I don't think he's done anything to merit starting in the rotation. I also don't like pushing Lowther to the bullpen which seemed to hurt him last year.

I had hoped to never see Martin again but I suppose he could make sense as a 28th man defensive sub.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, interloper said:

Honestly, if I could pick one area I think there's a good chance I'm wrong, it's the Odor/Martin thing. To me it makes so much sense having a guy like Richie on the bench, especially since he's been hitting. But I could see the O's trying out Odor for a few weeks to see if there's anything there. It really messes with being able to play Urias and Mateo at their best positions though, because it means one of them has to play 3B. And with Gutierrez and Owings playing well, Odor just doesn't make much sense to me. 

But I won't be surprised if Odor is on the team to start. Unlike a minor league signing, releasing Odor is flushing the ML minimum down the drain. 

And he's a lefty bat who has been proven to have some power.

Until Adley is up, we might only have 2 LH bats on the entire roster.   In a ballpark that is conduce to LH hitting.

Honestly, I feel it is very likely Odor makes the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are 40 on the 40 man roster.

You added Bemboom,  Owings and Martin.

You subtracted  Odor and Gillaspie or Mattson 

You need one more to go.

I don't think Elias will back track and DFA'd Gillaspie.

Isn't Mattson still injured.  If he is he can't be DFA'd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SteveA said:

And he's a lefty bat who has been proven to have some power.

Until Adley is up, we might only have 2 LH bats on the entire roster.   In a ballpark that is conduce to LH hitting.

Honestly, I feel it is very likely Odor makes the team.

Mullins and Bemboom are lefties.  Santander is a switch-hitter.

I think Stewart makes the bench.   

Martin gets the Diaz treatment.  Both have been injured for a couple of years and had good ST.   Neither has a good record at AAA.  They both will start at AAA IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wildcard said:

Mullins and Bemboom are lefties.  Santander is a switch-hitter.

I think Stewart makes the bench.   

Martin get the Diaz treatment.  Both have been injured for a couple of years and had good ST.   Neither has a good record at AAA.  They both will start at AAA IMO.

I was counting Mullins and Santander.   Not sure Stewart makes the team, especially as he is going to end up missing  more than half the shortened preseason with this injury.   Yeah, I forgot about Bemboom, but the backup C doesn't play that much, we are still essentially a highly righthanded team and we signed a major league veteran LH hitting 2Bman.   I think Odor makes the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, SteveA said:

I was counting Mullins and Santander.   Not sure Stewart makes the team, especially as he is going to end up missing  more than half the shortened preseason with this injury.   Yeah, I forgot about Bemboom, but the backup C doesn't play that much, we are still essentially a highly righthanded team and we signed a major league veteran LH hitting 2Bman.   I think Odor makes the team.

When the starting catcher is 37 years old be probably splits time with the back up until Adley arrives.  JMO.

Thought I read that Stewart is ready to play games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Great post.  I like your optimism, and I'll try to believe this team can turn things around just in the nick of time like some classic Hollywood baseball movie.
    • I think Elias has mostly done an excellent job with one exception -- he seems like he treats the bullpen like an afterthought.  I doubt that will happen again this coming offseason. I don't really blame him for the current offensive struggles overall.  Just too many injuries late in the season.  That said I don't understand how we went from dealing Austin Hays, Connor Norby and Ryan McKenna just so we could land the right handed bat of, gulp, Austin Slater.  
    • Man this team has no shot. Right now they may not even make it. 
    • Most of these guys are only playing because of injuries to starters.  But Austin Slater I'm guessing was brought in to replace the traded Austin Hays.  The problem is that Slater has shown little ability to hit lefties this year, after hitting them pretty well up to this season.  This must be why two teams dropped him before the O's picked him up.  I know he was let go much earlier in the season, but is Ryan McKenna actually worse than this guy?  I don't understand how the front office went from releasing McKenna to later trading Hays and Norby -- thinking their right handed bats could adequately be replaced by someone like Slater.  
    • I'm willing to give Elias some rope because of the strict limitations he was under with JA but he better not be so damn conservative again this year and let every serviceable FA out there sign with other teams while he's busy picking up reclamation projects again. Minus Burns of course.  
    • I agree completely that it’s irrelevant whether it worked.  But I don’t agree that bunting is clearly the right decision in either scenario, and I think that decision gets worse if it’s intended to be a straight sacrifice rather than a bunt for a hit. To be clear, the outcome you’re seeking in tonight’s situation, for example — sacrifice the runners over to 2nd/3rd — lowers both your run expectancy for the inning (from 1.44 to 1.39) and your win expectancy for the game (from 38.8% to 37.1%). It increases the likelihood of scoring one run, but it decreases the likelihood of scoring two runs (which you needed to tie) and certainly of scoring three or more runs (which you needed to take the lead).  And that’s if you succeed in getting them to 2nd/3rd. Research indicates that 15-30% of sacrifice bunt attempts fail, so you have to bake in a pretty significant percentage of the time that you’d just be giving up a free out (or even just two free strikes, as on Sunday). The bunt attempt in the 3rd inning on Sunday (which my gut hates more than if they’d done it today) actually is less damaging to the win probability — decreasing it only very slightly from 60.2% to 59.8%. More time left in the game to make up for giving up outs, I guess, and the scoreboard payoff is a bit better (in the sense that at least you’d have a better chance to take the lead).   At the bottom of it, these things mostly come down to gut and pure chance. The percentages are rarely overwhelming in either direction, and so sometimes even a “lower-percentage” play may work better under some circumstances. You would have bunted both times. I wouldn’t have bunted either time. Hyde bunted one time but not the other. I don’t know that anyone is an idiot (or even clearly “wrong”) for their preference. Either approach could have worked. Sadly, none of them actually did.
    • Wasn't Hyde always thought of more or less as a caretaker? I'm on the fence about him coming back. I totally get the injuries and that needs to be taking into consideration but man this collapse some heads have to roll who's I'm  mot sure 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...