Jump to content

Not a Bad Idea? Lopez as closer


wildcard

Recommended Posts

I guess he got lit up in his bad outing, but I saw him pitch yesterday and I guess you could say he's the guy that deserves an extended look at closer. Great velocity, good movement, and just enough of a change and a breaking ball to play off of that velo. He seemed to really confuse some A's hitters, but he was facing the bottom half of the order in the 9th. 

Might as well give him the job until he plays himself out of it.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sanfran327 said:

 

Might as well give him the job until he plays himself out of it.

This is where I'm at.  One could argue (and I'm not necessarily arguing this, it's still too early) that other pieces in the bullpen are settling into their roles.  I'm not sure if I'd be switching guys in and out of the closer role at the moment.  Lopez looks pretty good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Glad he's found his magic hat and wand since he seemed to have lost it all of last year.  Maybe they were in a clubhouse couch cushion or something.

Never heard why he left the team for over a month last year. Something was obvious happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

This is where I'm at.  One could argue (and I'm not necessarily arguing this, it's still too early) that other pieces in the bullpen are settling into their roles.  I'm not sure if I'd be switching guys in and out of the closer role at the moment.  Lopez looks pretty good.

I need to see more.   Against a weak offense, in front of 2300 fans.   The real test is in Toronto and Boston vs a full house with  one run lead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wildcard said:

I need to see more.   Against a weak offense, in front of 2300 fans.   The real test is in Toronto and Boston vs a full house with  one run lead.

Well, it looks like it's Opposite Day on the OH.  The king of small sample sizes is arguing for bigger sample sizes.

WC, I agree.  I think we all agree that we need to see more.  But there's some things to like here.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moose Milligan said:

Well, it looks like it's Opposite Day on the OH.  The king of small sample sizes is arguing for bigger sample sizes.

WC, I agree.  I think we all agree that we need to see more.  But there's some things to like here.  

Oh, I like to see him pitch well.  I just need to see more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moose Milligan said:

I agree, I think we all do. 

If he can be a guy that Elias and Sig and Co. turned around, that would be quite a success story.  Dude's got an electric arm, just a matter of harnessing it.  

Yep - for that small sample and his previous outing, we have seen pitching we haven't seen in quite a while.  Good for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My earlier post hasn’t aged well, but I’ve always liked his stuff.

The team was awful last year, so there was no reason not to try him as a starter. He had the same stuff then, but the 4th or 5th innings seemed to be roadblocks he couldn’t get past. So, to me, the problem has been between his ears. In all fairness, the personal issue may have distracted him, but he just seems better suited to relief and late game pressure doesn’t seem to be an issue….yet. 

All I know is he was lights out last night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, wildcard said:

Never heard why he left the team for over a month last year. Something was obvious happening.

Lopez’ toddler son had a very serious illness, and had to undergo a scary procedure. He pitched most of the year with that on his mind. I do not recall the details, but it could have been a fatal situation. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Jammer7 said:

Lopez’ toddler son had a very serious illness, and had to undergo a scary procedure. He pitched most of the year with that on his mind. I do not recall the details, but it could have been a fatal situation. 

IIRC, his son had cancer.  That's why he was gone as well as the reason he shaved his head last year, to support his son.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Good point, no other metropolitan area has more than one team.
    • Could it be that they allowed the Gnats to reside within 30 minutes of their home. Effectively cutting their market in half? 
    • Got my all-time low rarity score on today's game - 6.
    • 41 freaking years and here's this guy with the name pickles telling me I should be happy with 91 wins and getting owned in the playoffs again. 😂 😂 I saw a team that looked terrible the second half and probably didn't even deserve that spot the way they were playing .
    • Lol. Here's the funny they know more then you know. Typical Oriole fan who's happy with getting punched in the mouth. 
    • I don’t like the wall. I think it’s affecting our hitters. I’ve mentioned before that I think it has totally warped Mountcastle into something he was never really meant to be. The guy came up as a pull-heavy HR hitter, and in his first season-plus (725 PAs), he puts up 38 HRs and a 116 wRC+. Since then, the wRC+ is down to 110, and his approach has totally changed, with his pull numbers plummeting (down from 39% in 2021 to less than 28% this year). He still hits the ball hard, but constantly underachieves his batted ball data — probably because he’s trying to avoid the pull field and hitting balls to the deepest parts of pretty much every other park. Will the same thing happen to Mayo? Maybe he has more pure power, but it’s always going to be a challenge for a RH slugger to survive with that wall. So much harder to do damage.   Beyond that, I think it’s also creating a serious risk of changing our LH hitters’ approaches too. These guys (Henderson, Holliday, Cowser, 2/3 of Adley) have come up with a reputation for being able to drive the ball to all fields. But how long does that continue when they just can’t hit it out to the opposite field? Our LH hitters had a combined 44 wRC+ at OPACY, and only one HR. They had the 3rd most balls hit to LF at home by LHHs, but the lowest wRC+ of any team on those balls (for the second straight year). The Royals, ironically enough, were the only team that was lower than a 70 wRC+ — that’s how much worse our lefties fared going oppo (at OPACY) than everyone else’s. By player: Gunnar Henderson: 112 wRC+ / .160 ISO (51 PAs) Adley Rutschman: 10 wRC+ / .026 ISO (38 PAs) Anthony Santander: 14 wRC+ / .095 ISO (43 PAs) Colton Cowser: 58 wRC+ / .057 ISO (36 PAs) Ryan O’Hearn: 47 wRC+ / .091 ISO (55 PAs) Cedric Mullins: 23 wRC+ / .100 ISO (41 PAs) Jackson Holliday: -72 wRC+ / .000 ISO (16 PAs)   On the road, they had a combined 126 wRC+ (with 9 HRs) going to left field, so it’s not like they’re bad at it. It’s just Death Valley out there in LF for them at OPACY.  How long will it be until these LH guys just start going full pull-happy? Essentially, the opposite of what’s happened with Mountcastle. When (a) your team’s philosophy is to focus on doing damage and (b) you can’t DO damage to the opposite field — the rational endpoint is just to try to pull everything. I don’t think that’s a good outcome. I think it makes them much worse hitters in the other 81 games, and I think it’s a terrible waste of a bunch of really talented hitters with all-field abilities.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...