Jump to content

Why is it that the Orioles have off the day after the home opener so often?


Es4M11

Recommended Posts

After a quick check, going back 10 years the Orioles have had the next day off after the home opener something like 8/10 times. And if I am remembering correctly it has been that way since at least the 90's. Is there a specific reason for this? It doesn't seem that other teams get this day off nearly as often as the Orioles, but I have not actually checked to verify this.

Just a curiosity of mine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Es4M11 said:

After a quick check, going back 10 years the Orioles have had the next day off after the home opener something like 8/10 times. And if I am remembering correctly it has been that way since at least the 90's. Is there a specific reason for this? It doesn't seem that other teams get this day off nearly as often as the Orioles, but I have not actually checked to verify this.

Just a curiosity of mine

In cities that are colder and no dome or retractable roof they usually give the next day off in case if cold,rain or even snow. I think one year they did try to get most games in warmer weather and domes and retractable roofs.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Going Underground said:

In cities that are colder and no dome or retractable roof they usually give the next day off in case if cold,rain or even snow. I think one year they did try to get most games in warmer weather and domes and retractable roofs.

On it's face that makes sense, but I don't think Boston or New York get the day off after their home opener nearly as often. In recent years when the Orioles have opened in those cities they were generally all straight 3 day/game series. I'd have to actually look to be sure, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Es4M11 said:

On it's face that makes sense, but I don't think Boston or New York get the day off after their home opener nearly as often. In recent years when the Orioles have opened in those cities they were generally all straight 3 day/game series. I'd have to actually look to be sure, though.

This year both the Yankees and Red Sox both have the day off after their home openers Both also have the  day off after the Orioles and Tigers home openers. What has changed it seems is opening on a Thursday and getting Friday off. In the past it seemed most teams opened on a Monday. I remember I was at one game at Camden Yards when ESPN did the one Sunday night game opener. I think it was really cold that night.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Es4M11 said:

On it's face that makes sense, but I don't think Boston or New York get the day off after their home opener nearly as often. In recent years when the Orioles have opened in those cities they were generally all straight 3 day/game series. I'd have to actually look to be sure, though.

I think you are wrong.   We open in Boston next Thursday and have next Friday off.

Everyone in MLB opens next Thursday.  And there are only 5 games scheduled next Friday:  in Miami, Houston, Seattle, San Diego, and Los Angeles   Three domes/retractable domes and two SoCal locations where rain is unlikely.   

Nearly every team that is not in a dome or southern California location gets an open day after the home opener.   It is not unique to the Orioles nor is it more prevalent wit us than with any other outdoor non-SoCal team.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Going Underground said:

In cities that are colder and no dome or retractable roof they usually give the next day off in case if cold,rain or even snow. I think one year they did try to get most games in warmer weather and domes and retractable roofs.

This is the reason for sure. Its not just the Orioles, it's most non warm weather cities.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Orioles have habitually won on Opening Day...at least in my lifetime.......so I thought that day off after Opening Day was to give the players time to come to the realization that they just aren't going to win many more games the rest of the year.  But, the weather factor makes sense too  🙂

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No off day in 1956 but actually played a doubleheader the first week of the season.

Tue, Apr 17 @ Red Sox L 1 - 8  
Wed, Apr 18 @ Red Sox L 4 - 8  
Thu, Apr 19 @ Red Sox L 2 - 4  
Fri, Apr 20 vs Senators W 3 - 2  
Sat, Apr 21 vs Senators L 4 - 8  
Sun, Apr 22 vs Senators W 7 - 3  
Sun, Apr 22 vs Senators L 1 - 4  
Wed, Apr 25 vs Yankees  L 2 - 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SteveA said:

I think you are wrong.   We open in Boston next Thursday and have next Friday off.

Everyone in MLB opens next Thursday.  And there are only 5 games scheduled next Friday:  in Miami, Houston, Seattle, San Diego, and Los Angeles   Three domes/retractable domes and two SoCal locations where rain is unlikely.   

Nearly every team that is not in a dome or southern California location gets an open day after the home opener.   It is not unique to the Orioles nor is it more prevalent wit us than with any other outdoor non-SoCal team.

I am in fact wrong. Went back and checked the Yankees schedule over the past 10 years. They have made use of that make up day several times in just the past 5 years alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Es4M11 said:

I am in fact wrong. Went back and checked the Yankees schedule over the past 10 years. They have made use of that make up day several times in just the past 5 years alone.

And if they didn't last year, it could be a byproduct of the lockout.   The first week of the season was postponed and the schedule picked up a week into the original schedule.   So last year the Orioles "home opener" was a Monday with Milwaukee with no off day the next day, but that was only because it was not going to be the home opener on the original schedule.   Same could be true of any team that didn't have the off day in 2022; you'd have to find a copy of the original pre-lockout schedule to see if they were supposed to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
    • What if they don’t want to be extended?
    • I don't want the O's to lose much, but I do want there to be a massive streaming deal with Amazon or some other company the O's are left out of.  This blackout nonsense is bullsh!t. 🤬
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...