Jump to content

Holliday called up!


jcaponio

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, spleen1015 said:

Just because he hasn't gotten a hit and had some fun defensive plays doesn't mean he's pressing, nervous, any of that mental BS some of you like to put on these guys.

He's adjusting to playing Major League Baseball.

This. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Jagwar said:

And this is the Grand Poobah of Belgian brews

Chimay Blue

Last year I went to a meeting for work in Luxembourg, and flew in/out of Brussels. The last night I had a Chimay and a Lindemans' Kriek with some Flemish carbonnade at dinner, then a Cantillon Gueuze later on. Can't really go wrong with any of that. I love German beer, but the Belgians are doing a lot right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, justD said:

I did the math, and I guess you were 8 when he was fired in 1992.  So you couldn't know first-hand what his presence in the development of Orioles players meant.  You would then have been a teenager when he passed, when tributes would've been made to remind everyone who he was to the organization, and you were maybe not paying much attention to what was becoming a losing club for years to come. 

But surely you've heard of his influence on Cal and Eddie (and Bill), and even though it wasn't called that at the time, his contribution to what became "The Oriole Way" that we always talked about, even in the lean years of the '00s and '10s.  The work done in his name by the Cal Sr. Foundation to bring the basics of baseball to kids who otherwise would fall through the cracks all around the country (including my Harrisburg Boys & Girls Club RBI teams) reflects the teachings he tried to pass on, really basic stuff that I thought we all considered fundamental to how Orioles baseball was played. 

So yeah, a lot of people were feeling sentimental about it unofficially being a "retired" number in his honor.  Matt Holliday was even aware enough of this to talk to Cal last year about it, from what I've now heard.  The reason(s) that the Orioles organization never retired the number is for someone else to speculate about, but it was still a special number for Os fans regardless. 

Great post. We sometimes forget that we now have a newer generation that doesn't really remember what Cal Ripken Sr. brought to this organization. 

I don't necessarily think his number should have been retired (that should be for Orioles who were inducted into the HoF as Orioles), but he did have a lasting affect on the Orioles winning ways in the 70s and early 80s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Am I crazy for thinking Burnes isn't going to sniff Cole's deal?  I'm thinking like 7/260-280.  I don't think he's going to sniff Cole's deal.  For starters i dont think hes as good a pitcher as Cole was at the time of his signing.  Also, the Yankees aren't going to be in the bidding so that leaves the Mets, Giants, Nats, Orioles as teams that can afford him.  The Sox could too, but they're on the fringe of contention and might opt to develop more with the Yankees and Orioles solidly ahead of them in division.  Only the Mets from that list really seem like teams that would go over 300m for a pitcher, but they will be pressed for money because of the luxury tax.
    • Agree a strong RHP bullpen arm that misses bats would be good to add. Looking at Spotrac I don’t see who it would be. Dominguez could certainly be someone that could fill this role. 
    • Definitely leave the flag up. 
    • It looks like I misread your post as being about last offseason instead of the 2017-2018 offseason.  My mistake, but does that in any way affect my overall point - you know the part that I made explicit and you left out of your response - that all the old, reflexive Angelosian nonsense no longer automatically applies? I'm unclear on what you're driving at, especially if I have to go back to the 2017-2018 offseason when Peter Angelos might still have been giving input on running the team.  I think it's a stretch to try to draw parallels to those days, or even the John Angelos years, to David Rubenstein potential as an owner.
    • Irsay stealing the Colts in a midnight sneak away is in my top five depressing B-More moments, as well as the dreaded We Are Family Pirates in the ‘79 series. Otherwise, it’s a good bad list.
    • I forgot the name of the movie, but Jimmy Fallon was playing a BoSox superfan (tough role for an NY kid) and it was during the era of the ‘curse’ (right at the end of it actually) — a kid he was coaching asked, “What have the Red Sox ever done for you?” His character didn’t have an answer. But it made me think. The movie was out during the 14-years of losing seasons. I asked myself the same question about whether a lifetime of fandom was worth it. For me, outside of my family - 15 generations or more on the Eastern Shore - the O’s are also part of my DNA.  Win, lose, lose horribly, lose ugly, bad ownership, they just can’t shake me. All that said, I totally understand the frustration. It will take me a little longer to heal from this ugly exit to 2024.
    • In the market and $$$ for SP = Mets, Cubs, BOS, WAS and SFG (depending on Snell opt-out).  That’s enough chairs when music stops for Burnes and Fried to cash in, and still ample for second tier Eovaldi, Manea, Kikuchi, Flaherty.  
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...