Jump to content

player to watch- SS D.J. LeMahieu


Recommended Posts

I have been asked if there are any shortstops worth watching besides Grant Green and Ryan Jackson.

LSU's D.J. LeMahieu merits consideration- with the caveat that he's a sophomore this year, which means he might make himself draft eligible, or he might not...

D.J. is very big 6'4 195 lbs. This means he will likely develop good power, but he might not be able to stick at SS at that size. His .943 fielding pct so far this year adds to that concern.

If he could stick at SS, that would be a huge bonus for him and the team that signs him. He'll provide plenty of offense and power at that position.

So far, he's hot out of the gate, hitting a whopping .526 with 2 HR and 12 RBI's. Last year, as a true freshman, he hit .360 with 14 HR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have been asked if there are any shortstops worth watching besides Grant Green and Ryan Jackson.

LSU's D.J. LeMahieu merits consideration- with the caveat that he's a sophomore this year, which means he might make himself draft eligible, or he might not...

D.J. is very big 6'4 195 lbs. This means he will likely develop good power, but he might not be able to stick at SS at that size. His .943 fielding pct so far this year adds to that concern.

If he could stick at SS, that would be a huge bonus for him and the team that signs him. He'll provide plenty of offense and power at that position.

So far, he's hot out of the gate, hitting a whopping .526 with 2 HR and 12 RBI's. Last year, as a true freshman, he hit .360 with 14 HR.

He's draft eligible.

A bit big-bodied for a prototypical SS, but certainly something BAL fans got used to seeing with Cal. Like Cal, he sets himself up well pre-pitch and gets excellent reads off the bat. He ranges pretty well to both sides and handles himself around the bag.

There's also still some projection left in his frame, so he could conceivably add more power. More me, range is a greater question than his hands, so I'll be interested to see how he continues to develop over the season. Could be solid mid-1st rounder. Maybe improve draft status if some in front of him fall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's draft eligible.

A bit big-bodied for a prototypical SS, but certainly something BAL fans got used to seeing with Cal. Like Cal, he sets himself up well pre-pitch and gets excellent reads off the bat. He ranges pretty well to both sides and handles himself around the bag.

There's also still some projection left in his frame, so he could conceivably add more power. More me, range is a greater question than his hands, so I'll be interested to see how he continues to develop over the season. Could be solid mid-1st rounder. Maybe improve draft status if some in front of him fall.

No chance he falls to 2:5? Seems doubtful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IF he demonstrates this year that he can stay at SS, and he continues to mash, might he sneak up into the top 10? We could use a good SS who can hit.

That question won't be answered until he's a pro. He may profile better at 2B, but he has a fair chance to stick at SS. Yes, he could get up to the Top 10 if he puts up a huge offensive season -- but he'd likely be a reach at 1:5.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That question won't be answered until he's a pro. He may profile better at 2B, but he has a fair chance to stick at SS. Yes, he could get up to the Top 10 if he puts up a huge offensive season -- but he'd likely be a reach at 1:5.

Sounds like he's this years version of Gordon Beckham.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The track record for making to the Majors is much better for programs like Arizona State and LSU than other schools. The numbers carry a bit more weight with me because they play good schools. Some guy might put up eye-popping numbers at Radford or Hofstra put are they playing against tough competition?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The track record for making to the Majors is much better for programs like Arizona State and LSU than other schools. The numbers carry a bit more weight with me because they play good schools. Some guy might put up eye-popping numbers at Radford or Hofstra put are they playing against tough competition?

I agree there is some comfort in seeing players log time against top competition. To be fair, that's why I don't really get excited about the first few weeks of production in the college season -- I generally prefer conference play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree there is some comfort in seeing players log time against top competition. To be fair, that's why I don't really get excited about the first few weeks of production in the college season -- I generally prefer conference play.

I agree. This time of year you might be able to see schools/players that are going to fall short of pre-season expectations by losing to inferior opponents, but its much more difficult to gauge exactly how good a team/player is when they are slapping around the FAMUs and Appy States of the college baseball world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I spoke with a national cross-checker who told me LeMahieu may be catching up with, and possibly passing Green as top college SS prospect available in the draft.

He says it's still iffy if he can hold his own at SS at the big league level, but played well at SS during the Cape Cod League and so far at LSU this year. He has 4 errors to Green's 6. He moves well for a big guy (4 for 4 in steals this year).

He says if Green continues to be icy cold, and LeMahieu continues his metoric rise and maintains it through the whole season, we could see big changes in the draft order in June.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I spoke with a national cross-checker who told me LeMahieu may be catching up with, and possibly passing Green as top college SS prospect available in the draft.

He says it's still iffy if he can hold his own at SS at the big league level, but played well at SS during the Cape Cod League and so far at LSU this year. He has 4 errors to Green's 6. He moves well for a big guy (4 for 4 in steals this year).

He says if Green continues to be icy cold, and LeMahieu continues his metoric rise and maintains it through the whole season, we could see big changes in the draft order in June.

So as long as the two continue down this path for another 10 weeks, there's a chance LeMahieu could make a big jump and/or Green could fall. Sounds like the cross-checker is going out on a limb here. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • As someone that was all for DFA’ing McKenna for Hicks, I really can’t fault him for tonight.   I’m impressed he stole the base. He sort of had to run there with two outs. He stole it. He just came off the bag. That happens.  The route may have not been the best because he was going to his left and as a RH thrower he was just trying to position himself to throw home. He doesn’t have Vlad Sr’s arm out there. That’s a .01% chance play there.  Our CF depth is pretty thin. I think the only way we DFA McKenna is if Hicks comes here. Kjerstad will be the one to go for Hays. Remember last August when at full strength/healthy Mullins, and only a 26 man roster, we rolled with a 4 man bench of McCann, Hicks, Mateo, Urias/Frazier/Westburg.  Oddly, we’re deep enough into the season, and CF depth is thin, that I’d say there’s a 50/50 shot McKenna doesn’t clear waivers. I don’t know we have the luxury of CF depth to DFA him w/o Hicks in the mix. 
    • I think they will DFA him. They already did it once. And the fact nobody claimed him means you’re probably right about not starting for other teams. 
    • I had fun watching the extra innings of this game. That was good TV. Thanks Craig for serving up the evening’s entertainment!
    • Additionally, you can hover over the user name you want to ignore and a box pops up. The last button on the right at the bottom is the ignore button, click that and check all three boxes and you're done. Source: I'm a professional ignorer.
    • We have threads asking for Kremer, Grayson, and Povich in the closer role. Can we acknowledge that Cano is the pretty obvious next man up if Kimbrel is removed at some point? I don’t really care about his 9th inning splits. He’s our best reliever and until he gets a chance and fails I’m going to assume that’s just noise and he’ll do the best job. Tonight makes nine straight appearances with either a Save or Hold. Overall he has held a lead 10 times in 11 chances, and the one miss was a bad outing but still nearly a SV if not for Gunnar’s walk-off throwing error. 
    • McKenna was finally beginning to grow on me after years of my derision. He's done a few good things offensively. But I think he wouldn't  start for another team in the American League. I would DFA him(they won't) and bring up Hays in LF, Cowser in CF for a while, and Santander in RF. I still think if they give Kjerstad enough at bats, and not just coming off the bench as a PH, he will hit and hit for power....I dont like him getting 4 at bats a week... I think he needs to play. Mullins needs to sit for a few games.He simply cant track the ball all of a sudden.Its almost hard to watch. Maybe he's hurting.
    • Second game in a row he couldn't get 3 outs. I don't understand how anyone would think he's fine right now, or "he just does this". It's not sustainable to keep running him out there and giving up HRs and walking the yard and expecting another reliever to have to come in and bail him out. If he's the plan for the 9th in close games, they're in trouble.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...