Jump to content

May 3rd @ Reds


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Philip said:

The Tigers have a  Good team this year.

In the 5th inning, Reese Olsen has given up exactly 2 NY hits, 4 JS only one BB.

 

They are pitching well, but they have some, uh, holes in the lineup to put it mildly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Malike said:

Yes, real NY'ers root for the Mets. NY has in fact had people born and raised in NY for many years after those teams left the state. They are real NY'ers, too.

Fake NY'ers are Yankee/Cowboys fans. There are more of those than anything here.

It’s been a tough week for Yankees fans.  The Yanks lost 3/4 against the O’s and the Lakers got eliminated from the playoffs.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This looks like MASN is broadcasting Cal's last game. Here's how I remember this going... 

Cal gets up on deck with 2 outs and Brady Anderson gets to bat in front of him.. Then Brady strikes out to end the game. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Remember The Alomar said:

The original Orioles became the New York Highlanders which, in turn, became the New York Yankees. 

No, the original Orioles were contracted out of the National League after the 1899 season.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

This looks like MASN is broadcasting Cal's last game. Here's how I remember this going... 

Cal gets up on deck with 2 outs and Brady Anderson gets to bat in front of him.. Then Brady strikes out to end the game. 

XWfC.gif

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never understood why Camden Yards was painted with so much dark green back then. You would think they would try to keep it closer to team colors. Dark pine green is as far away from Orioles and baseball colors as it gets. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Remember The Alomar said:

There is a direct lineage between the late 19th century NL Orioles and the AL Orioles of 01-02. 

Two years later.

So you think of it as a Cleveland Browns situation?

I consider them separate but if you don't I won't fight about it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

This looks like MASN is broadcasting Cal's last game. Here's how I remember this going... 

Cal gets up on deck with 2 outs and Brady Anderson gets to bat in front of him.. Then Brady strikes out to end the game. 

That is correct. I was sitting in center field bleachers and remember it like it was last night. 

Even before Cal announced he was retiring, I went ahead the day the individual tix went on sale that January or whatever and bought a Yankee Stadium ticket as it would have been his last ever game. And I planned a whole mini-tour of AL East parks to see his last game in those parks. So I had his last game ticket for NY, Boston and Baltimore bought in January, plus trips to Philly, Pittsburgh, the Martin Guitar Factory in Nazareth, and a Ray Davies Storytellers show in Falls Church VA. 

The downside was that 9-11 occurred and all games were postponed and eventually rescheduled about two weeks later. The whole trip was pushed back.  But the Yankee Stadium game, which was supposed to be his last, ended up being not the last game. That game was called after 15 innings due to rain. Cal went 0-8, I think. 

So I ended up paying $200 for his actual last game, which was the one at Camden Yards. Still a thrill, but ended in a disappointment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Billy F-Face3 said:

I never understood why Camden Yards was painted with so much dark green back then. You would think they would try to keep it closer to team colors. Dark pine green is as far away from Orioles and baseball colors as it gets. 

I think I read in "Ballpark", the book about the making of OPACY, that color was chosen due to the color of the seats in one of the old Orioles (or Terrapin) Park. 

Personally, I love the choices and it's one of my favorite shades of green. 

Edited by NashLumber
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Two years later.

So you think of it as a Cleveland Browns situation?

I consider them separate but if you don't I won't fight about it.

 

I was about to make that comparison. However, after reading the wiki on the subject again, you are technically correct. 

You can tell my Friday night plans fell through, as I am have semantic debate on late 19th century baseball with a smiling can of corn on the internet. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • Just did a bit of a walk. Some decently large braches down, one segment of privacy fence missing and standing water on the property in a low spot.  
    • Just woke up and I don't hear any wind or rain.
    • Not that I am in any way full agreement, but this is a classic post.  Doesn't Machado play chess?  Maybe we could get some chess boards in the clubhouse and junk all the legos.  Not all great baseball men are John McGraw bad asses.  Some can be Christy Mathewsons as well, I suppose.  Not that I imagine today's young players much resembling McGraw or Mathewson, but they are the first two contrasting old school types that come to mind.  I will say just based on his postseason alone I'd much rather have Tatis over Machado.
    • Well I refuse to believe that only the O's have no players that want extensions.
    • Customer advocate groups have tried for decades to force the cable companies to allow channel by channel (a la carte) subscriptions, but the cable companies fought this because it would result in far less revenue (than forcing us to pay for a hundred channels we don't watch).  The government refused to intervene, so we've been stuck with the existing business model for all this time.  Streaming is forcing the change because streaming -- for now -- is an a la carte model.   MLB's fear must be this: if the regional sports network cable channel model goes away, will most users pay anywhere close to what these channels made as part of a cable bundle for just one streaming channel where all you watch are Orioles games (or maybe Orioles and Nats games -- whatever the case may be)?  So if you pay $100/month for cable with MASN, you are probably watching at least a few other channels too.  But will you pay $15/month (or whatever the price may be) just to watch the Orioles -- even during the months when there is no baseball?  The existing basic cable model has been quite stable because people tend to watch at least 5 or 6 channels.  They're reluctant to cancel their whole cable package just because baseball season is over -- or they've been too busy to watch many games this season.  But with a single streaming channel of just baseball there is bound to be a far more unstable revenue base.  All the streaming channels are already dealing with this problem.  I think MLB is maybe reluctant to go all in on streaming for this reason.  Perhaps they're looking for new different model that could allow them to bundle individual team channels with Netflix, or Prime, or maybe with your cell phone plan or something else.  This could give them some stability, but it could also be a turn off for the more hardcore fans who just want the Orioles and little else.  It will be interesting to see how this all shakes out and if MLB, and the Orioles, will prosper or suffer as a result.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...