Jump to content

Brandon Young 2024


Just Regular

Recommended Posts

High praise from Eric Longenhagen, who put him in Others who earned Consideration on his MLB-wide Top 100 mid-May update published today at Fangraphs.

https://blogs.fangraphs.com/a-top-100-prospects-update/

Holliday 1, Basallo 9, Mayo 22, Kjerstad 26, Povich 92 the other Orioles placements.

Brandon Young, RHP, Baltimore Orioles

 

Young has had a little velocity bump and has been utterly dominant at Double-A Bowie. His fastball has always had big vertical break, but now it’s more often 93-94 mph, up from 91-92. He has a well-defined four-pitch mix and plus command, though only his changeup is generating a plus rate of swing-and-miss and Young locates that pitch in the zone much more often than is typical of a big league pitcher. He’s a near-ready starter but let’s see him sustain the velo bump all year before considering him a mid-rotation prospect.

 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow. “Near-ready starter” and consideration in the top 100 based on a breakout in 17.1 IP in AA as a 25 year old?

I’d love to see it obviously, but that seems really going out on a limb. Young hasn’t pitched nearly enough in his whole professional career to suggest he can hold up under a full SP workload, or sustain this velo bump. I’m excited for Young and this only reinforces my thought that the Orioles might have something here, but my hopes are still just for a healthy season and maybe he becomes a RP option in 2025. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

Wow. “Near-ready starter” and consideration in the top 100 based on a breakout in 17.1 IP in AA as a 25 year old?

I’d love to see it obviously, but that seems really going out on a limb. Young hasn’t pitched nearly enough in his whole professional career to suggest he can hold up under a full SP workload, or sustain this velo bump. I’m excited for Young and this only reinforces my thought that the Orioles might have something here, but my hopes are still just for a healthy season and maybe he becomes a RP option in 2025. 

I hear you. He's 6'6" and 215. As he gets healthy does he gain some velocity? I think there might be more in the tank. But I agree the durability is an issue worth watching.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really his fault that he’s 25 in AA, with the TJ surgery.  He’s old for the level but not in terms of MiL experience.  It’s not like he’s been stuck at a level for non-injury reasons.  My guess is the O’s will push him to AAA in a month or two.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Line today: 4.2 IP, 5 H, 4 R, 1 BB, 7 K. No homers, so must have clustered all of those baserunners together to end up with that many runs allowed. 

ERA now 4.09 but today’s line won’t put a dent in his stellar FIP/xFIP, which both support Longenhagen’s “consideration for the top 100” assessment. He’s certainly on promotion watch soon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Longenhagen is the same guy who had Cowser as our #12 prospect last year and said Westburg was a fringy defender who would need a late inning defensive replacement.   I hope he’s right this time.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Longenhagen is the same guy who had Cowser as our #12 prospect last year and said Westburg was a fringy defender who would need a late inning defensive replacement.   I hope he’s right this time.

He definitely goes out on a limb more than others, and I’ll never trust his opinion on a player’s defense after Westburg (and then doubling down in a chat this past winter even after Westburg’s rookie year). So when he tanks a guy’s review for defensive reasons or says something like Jud Fabian doesn’t have CF defense (when literally everyone else does), that means nothing to me. 

However, if he’s one of the first to highlight Young and he does end up getting more recognition down the line, he’ll deserve some credit.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

He definitely goes out on a limb more than others, and I’ll never trust his opinion on a player’s defense after Westburg (and then doubling down in a chat this past winter even after Westburg’s rookie year). So when he tanks a guy’s review for defensive reasons or says something like Jud Fabian doesn’t have CF defense (when literally everyone else does), that means nothing to me. 

However, if he’s one of the first to highlight Young and he does end up getting more recognition down the line, he’ll deserve some credit.

Ya know, I just read his write up and it’s almost embarrassing.  He seems to have no clue that Basallo wasn’t catching because of the stress fracture in his elbow.   
 

“He looks good behind the plate (his receiving has improved, and his arm is still great), but he is more often playing first base and DH’ing than he is catching. Especially with his offense slowing down somewhat, I think it makes sense for the Orioles to revisit focus on the catching position.”

Then he calls Brandon Young “utterly dominant” so far this year.   Out of 6 appearances at the time of the article, Young had two appearances which could be described as dominant.  2 of 6.   Each of those two consisted of 3 innings.  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, RZNJ said:

Ya know, I just read his write up and it’s almost embarrassing.  He seems to have no clue that Basallo wasn’t catching because of the stress fracture in his elbow.   
 

“He looks good behind the plate (his receiving has improved, and his arm is still great), but he is more often playing first base and DH’ing than he is catching. Especially with his offense slowing down somewhat, I think it makes sense for the Orioles to revisit focus on the catching position.”

Then he calls Brandon Young “utterly dominant” so far this year.   Out of 6 appearances at the time of the article, Young had two appearances which could be described as dominant.  2 of 6.   Each of those two consisted of 3 innings.  
 

 

I think it’s fair to say Young has been utterly dominant based on his K/BB/HR rates producing a 1.15 FIP and 1.54 xFIP. But that’s only if you’re only looking at those things rather than the actual ERA results, which have definitely not been dominant. 

The Basallo bit was embarrassing and clearly he just didn’t know about the injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, CaptainRedbeard said:

I think it’s fair to say Young has been utterly dominant based on his K/BB/HR rates producing a 1.15 FIP and 1.54 xFIP. But that’s only if you’re only looking at those things rather than the actual ERA results, which have definitely not been dominant. 

The Basallo bit was embarrassing and clearly he just didn’t know about the injury.

One thing I have to add on Young.   That analysis was based on about 17 IP.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well as an early guy on Young pre-TJ, I'm glad to see him back and throwing well. I still need to see more swing and miss on the breaking balls but the change can be a real weapon. I have him at the bottom of my top 30 right now because I just need to see more on the breaking ball, see him getting deeper into games, and staying healthy over 120 innings or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We’ll get his Statcast data now!

Saw this excellent write up on Twitter. Makes me even more convinced that the injury question is really the main thing that could hold him back, especially with that funky delivery. And sounds like there could even be a bit more unlock to find a better weapon against righties.

Total Stuff+: 107 | Fastball: 115 | Changeup: 108 | Slider: 96 | Curveball: 100

Overall: Weird combo of height, release and vertical break; great underlying swing-miss

Young has dominated Double-A Bowie through 5 starts, posting a 42% strikeout with just a 4% walk rate. The success stems from a plus four-seam fastball. It’s averaging 93 mph with 20” vertical break and 5” arm-side from a 6.2’ release. His release is higher than the average of 5.8’, but even once you adjust for that release, he’s still carrying the ball ~2” more than average. In trying to figure out how that shape could be chewing up hitters to the tune of a 41% swing-miss rate, almost double that of the usual fastball, I stumbled on his height. Young is 6-foot-6, which I did not expect based on the pitch characteristics presented above. The majority of guys touching 20” vertical from a 6.2’ release (like Jose Urquidy and Trevor Richards) are doing so with higher arm angles from shorter frames. Young is somehow able to do so from a larger frame. He falls off hard towards the first base side after foot plant, which helps to get his shoulder line lower so he can sustain a higher release. This and his extension prevent him from having a 6.6’+ release, an area where it would make his vertical break less impactful. Hitter performance is also telling us it’s a weird look.

His best secondary is a changeup which he’s putting in the zone at a 63% clip. This is very high for a changeup (40% is average). Despite the high zone rate, he’s still generating strong swing-miss and limiting contact quality. His slider grades below average due to the 84 mph velocity it averages without outlier sweep or drop. The pitch looks like the sliders of Dean Kremer and Grayson Rodriguez in shape, just slower (~5” sweep, ~5” vertical break). It has an xwOBA above .420, which is high for a slider. I imagine it’s a righty weapon for him, but still a work in progress based on the results. It’s also the only thing in his mix that’s not in zone over 40%. Cueing this shape harder is common practice in orgs. If it sacrifices drop to push into the 86-87 mph range, where movement becomes less important for a pitch’s success from a Stuff+ perspective, it would be worth it.

  • Thanks 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So if he continues cruising in Norfolk, do we resist the temptation to bring him up this year to help the bullpen? With his plus command and whiff %’s he’d could be a huge asset. But those things also scream future starter…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, joelala said:

So if he continues cruising in Norfolk, do we resist the temptation to bring him up this year to help the bullpen? With his plus command and whiff %’s he’d could be a huge asset. But those things also scream future starter…

Definitely future starter, but I’m assuming his workload is going to be closely monitored this year given his past injuries. So he could get shifted to a RP at the end of this year for workload considerations, maybe even earlier than Povich and McDermott.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • On the spot?  Maybe.   Even at full health, people would have accepted not winning the division because of the pace the Yankees are on.   We have a comfortable lead for the WC so if the Orioles can continue winning at a reasonable pace with Burnes/GRod/Kremer/Irvin/Povich/Suarez.   As far as the playoffs go, there’s only a few starters that inspire confidence in a playoff series that will be available.   Elias isn’t trading Holliday, Basallo, or Mayo.  He just isn’t.   He can get relievers without giving up top prospects.  The question is, can he get someone like Crochet without giving up those top 3?   Crochet, despite innings concerns, gives you a playoff starter plus someone who’ll be here after Burnes is gone. However, Crochet is an A.J. Preller type of move, not an Elias type of move.   If Povich looks the part of a ML starter AND no more starters go down, I could see Elias standing pat on the starters and fortifying the back end of the bullpen.
    • If a team that loses a qualifying free agent does not receive revenue sharing and did exceed the luxury-tax salary threshold the previous season, it is awarded a compensatory pick after the fourth round. San Diego Padres Compensation for Josh Hader. The Astros forfeited their second-round pick for signing Hader. San Diego Padres Compensation for Blake Snell. The Giants forfeited their third-round pick for signing Snell. Toronto Blue Jays Compensation for Matt Chapman. The Giants forfeited their second-round pick for signing Chapman.
    • If a team that loses a qualifying free agent does not receive revenue sharing and did not exceed the luxury-tax salary threshold the previous season, it is awarded a compensatory pick after Competitive Balance Round B.   Los Angeles Angels Compensation for Shohei Ohtani. The Dodgers forfeited their second- and fifth-round picks for signing Ohtani.
    • picks If a team that loses a qualifying free agent is a revenue-sharing recipient and the free agent signs for at least $50 million, the team will be awarded a pick between the first round and Competitive Balance Round A.   Minnesota Twins Compensation for Sonny Gray. The Cardinals forfeited their second-round pick for signing Gray.
    • The answer appears to be, yes, you can receive more than one compensation picks. Angels -- Shohei Ohtani: Pick after Competitive Balance Round B Blue Jays -- Matt Chapman: Pick after Round 4 Cubs -- Cody Bellinger: Pick after Competitive Balance Round B Padres -- Blake Snell: Pick after Round 4 Padres -- Josh Hader: Pick after Round 4
    • the question isn’t about being able to make the offers, it’s about being awarded compensatory picks for more than one.
    • I don’t consider a 4 o’clock game a night game. He also caught Wednesday night and Thursday day this week. Moral of the story is McCann will start 4 games in 7 days because he is Burnes preferred catcher.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...