Jump to content

Outfield PA the rest of the way


Frobby

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, Frobby said:

He’s only played there a small amount in the majors.  In the minors, he played CF about 75% of the time.   So, it’s not like he’s inexperienced as a CF.   

The point of contention isn't Cowser's experience, but rather the value of those defensive stats in such a small sample.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Frobby said:

In CF: 

Mullins (624.1 innings): -1 Rtot, -1 Rdrs, +3 OAA, +0.1 UZR

Cowser (152.0 innings): +3 Rtot, +1 Rdrs, +1 OAA, +0.5 UZR

Cowser tops Mullins in 3 of the 4 metrics, and also in the fourth one if you pro-rate it by innings played.  

So, I’m not going to say Cowser is as good or better than Mullins in CF, but where’s the evidence that he isn’t?   The only real evidence is that when they’re both in the field at the same time, Hyde plays Mullins in CF.   But that may be more of a veteran deference thing, or it may reflect, as @Sports Guysaid, that Cowser’s skill set works better than Mullins’ in a corner spot.  Honestly, I couldn’t see Mullins making the throw from the LF wall at all.   And, throwing left-handed is disadvantageous for a LF on a lot of plays Cowser throws right-handed).  
 

The bolded is honestly enough for me.

Hyde said verbatim on Sunday that "Mullins is my best defensive center fielder."

They surely have proprietary stats we are  not privy to, and there's no reason to think they're not better than what he have, and that the O's would go against them if they showed something different.

There's no evidence they do things out of "veteran deference."  If they did, they wouldn't have sat Mullins and Hays as much as they have this year.

BTW, why do you think it's disadvantageous to be LH in LF?  You do have to turn against your body to throw to second, but any ball you're moving towards the line to field is an easier play.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

 

There's a lot to like about Cowser.  He does a lot of things well.

Unfortunate, he has one giant gaping hole in his game, and it may well be the most important tool.

That said, I want him to play a lot going forward and I still think he can improve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pickles said:

 

BTW, why do you think it's disadvantageous to be LH in LF?  You do have to turn against your body to throw to second, but any ball you're moving towards the line to field is an easier play.  

I was mostly thinking about the throwing.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, Malike said:

This is good reading.

According to Tom Tango, MLB Senior Database Architect of Stats, expected stats were designed to only be descriptive. If the goal was to be predictive, they would have been designed differently. Expected stats tell you what the likely outcome should have been. They are not predictive so use them accordingly.

Properly Diving Into Expected Stats | Community Blog (fangraphs.com)

I want to make sure I understand. So what these stats refer to is the expected outcome of a play that has already happened? As in, “in this play, we expected X, And Y happened?”

And the only thing we can glean from this information is whether a player has been particularly unlucky or not?

If I’m correct, I don’t see much value in this particular stat, and if I’m still incorrect, or at least incomplete, do you mind filling in what I’m missing?

Because to be honest, when I look at a savant page and see a whole lot of red, I occasionally don’t look much deeper.

Edited by HowAboutThat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, HowAboutThat said:

I want to make sure I understand. So what these stats refer to is the expected outcome of a play that has already happened? As in, “in this play as we would have expected X, And Y happened?”

And the only thing we can glean from this information is whether a player has been particularly unlucky or not?

If I’m correct, I don’t see much value in this particular stat, and if I’m still incorrect, or at least incomplete, do you mind filling in what I’m missing?

Because to be honest, when I look at a savant page and see a whole lot of red, I occasionally don’t look much deeper.

Your first paragraph is correct. If you have time you should really read the article I linked, it should answer all of your questions and I'm at work so have really limited time depending on when the next emergency happens or BS drunk annoying call, etc.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mullins is hitting .174 in July with 1 XBH and a 7:1 K/BB ratio. Cowser’s OPS on the season is now .108 points higher and he’s been worth 1.7 more WAR in almost the same number of PA’s.

Deciding who gets more PA’s between the two shouldn’t be that hard. Mullins has a .640 OPS the last calendar year. I’ll take my chances with Cowser. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LGOrioles said:

Mullins is hitting .174 in July with 1 XBH and a 7:1 K/BB ratio. Cowser’s OPS on the season is now .108 points higher and he’s been worth 1.7 more WAR in almost the same number of PA’s.

Deciding who gets more PA’s between the two shouldn’t be that hard. Mullins has a .640 OPS the last calendar year. I’ll take my chances with Cowser. 

As I've mentioned previously on this board, Mullins needs to be made into the full-time 4th OF immediately. It's ridiculous that Hyde and Elias have mishandled and benched Kjerstad so much when he's a difference-making bat. And it's also bad roster management to have been benching Cowser more often recently.

Cowser is a fine defensive CF, has clearly better offensive numbers than Mullins, has gotten unlucky, and has good underlying metrics which suggest he has even more offensive upside to tap into. He needs to be this team's full-time CF as soon as possible.

Mullins is a clearly declining player. It's time to make a change. Mullins would be one of the very best 4th OF's in baseball, and can play regularly as a late-game defensive replacement for Kjerstad (pushing Cowser back to LF when Mullins comes into games). Mullins would also be a great pinch-runner for late game situations, making Jorge Mateo even more obsolete after Coby Mayo is called up.

Edited by Brooks The Great
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, sportsfan8703 said:

Cowser had elite batting analytics “red” when he makes contact. The contact is the “blue” part of his baseball savant page. 

Gotta make contact. Contact to damage ratio. Channeling Buck Showalter post game pressers. 

Cowser does K 6.7% more than Mullins but he also walks 4.4% more. Even with the K’s, his OBP is .309 (compared to a laughable .257 for Mullins) and his SLG is .430 (compared to .374 for Mullins). Striking out less isn’t really that much of an argument in favor of Mullins considering his low walk rate and how little damage he does when he makes contact. 

Since May 1st, when Cowser has struggled, he has a 78 wRC+. Mullins has a 75 wRC+ in the last calendar year. There is zero reason to be playing Mullins over Cowser. He has considerably less upside offensively and while Cowser has been going through some rookie struggles the last 2 months, he’s still been better offensively in that time frame than Mullins has been in the last calendar year (which covers 132 games and 451 PA’s).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LGOrioles said:

Cowser does K 6.7% more than Mullins but he also walks 4.4% more. Even with the K’s, his OBP is .309 (compared to a laughable .257 for Mullins) and his SLG is .430 (compared to .374 for Mullins). Striking out less isn’t really that much of an argument in favor of Mullins considering his low walk rate and how little damage he does when he makes contact. 

Since May 1st, when Cowser has struggled, he has a 78 wRC+. Mullins has a 75 wRC+ in the last calendar year. There is zero reason to be playing Mullins over Cowser. He has considerably less upside offensively and while Cowser has been going through some rookie struggles the last 2 months, he’s still been better offensively in that time frame than Mullins has been in the last calendar year (which covers 132 games and 451 PA’s).

There’s a million ways to slice and dice this.   Mullins had an abysmal May, so starting with May 1 isn’t doing him any favors.  He rebounded nicely in June, while Cowser really didn’t.  They’re both getting plenty of playing time and I expect that will continue, but right now I’m leaning Mullins until Cowser heats up.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Frobby said:

There’s a million ways to slice and dice this.   Mullins had an abysmal May, so starting with May 1 isn’t doing him any favors.  He rebounded nicely in June, while Cowser really didn’t.  They’re both getting plenty of playing time and I expect that will continue, but right now I’m leaning Mullins until Cowser heats up.  

I was counting Cowser’s stats since May since that’s when he started struggling. Mullins wRC+ listed was from the last calendar year, so a much larger sample size where he has been struggling even more so than Cowser. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LGOrioles said:

Cowser does K 6.7% more than Mullins but he also walks 4.4% more. Even with the K’s, his OBP is .309 (compared to a laughable .257 for Mullins) and his SLG is .430 (compared to .374 for Mullins). Striking out less isn’t really that much of an argument in favor of Mullins considering his low walk rate and how little damage he does when he makes contact. 

Since May 1st, when Cowser has struggled, he has a 78 wRC+. Mullins has a 75 wRC+ in the last calendar year. There is zero reason to be playing Mullins over Cowser. He has considerably less upside offensively and while Cowser has been going through some rookie struggles the last 2 months, he’s still been better offensively in that time frame than Mullins has been in the last calendar year (which covers 132 games and 451 PA’s).

I don't think it is clear at all. They have both been maddeningly inconsistent at the plate. Mullins is coming off an .849 June. They are both under .500 in July. Sharing time makes sense until one or the other establishes consistency. I think Mullins has an edge on defense, Cowser's OBP gives him an edge on offense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Posts

    • Any new thoughts on trades?   I think we are out on both Crochet and Skubal.  But I believe we will trade for a solid number three type for the rotation.  Maybe a Jameson Taillon or Chris Bassitt type.    I would love to see the O’s get Skubal though.  I think I might be in the minority when I say trade Holliday.  I think with Gunnar, Westy, Mayo and Norby, we can afford to move Holliday.  And the Tigers would love to have him and be rid of the horrible Javier Baez at SS.  Obviously Holliday would not be enough.  I would suggest also trading a promising OFer, maybe Jud Fabian, a promising IFer, Max Wagner and also throw in a promising SP, like Seth Johnson.    Thoughts? 
    • I thought this comment by Eric Longenghagen was interesting: Groupthink on the Rise Another common response from industry personnel this year was something like, “We are all making decisions looking at the same data and, increasingly, based on similar interpretations of that data.” This intersects with the college contact hitter point above. Teams are looking at fastball vertical approach angle and hitters’ contact and chase rates, and they have regression models that are fed the same data as their competitors’ models, in part because MLB (and its cheaper owners) wanted to avoid an arms race in this space. People in successful organizations diffuse to bad ones when the bad ones make a new GM or POBO hire, and the methodology of the successful orgs spreads to the crummier teams. This is happening faster than individual teams can make a leap in scouting or dev, and we’re approaching a sort of equilibrium where the competitive advantages will be mined from the interpersonal nooks and crannies of this process and the strategy with which teams pick. I think you could argue that orgs that are less inclined to adhere to data-based methods are in a better position now than ever before because the many data-driven teams end up competing for the same players. If there’s a science- or analytics-driven gap between teams, it’s in the way player development is considered as they determine their draft targets. https://blogs.fangraphs.com/2024-mlb-draft-day-two-and-three-roundup/
    • Please keep the top 3.  
    • Burnes has been kind of unlucky in the W/L department this year.  In his 7 no decisions he’s pitched 42 innings to a 3.00 ERA.  He’s thrown 17 quality starts in 21 outings.  The guy really gives his team a chance to win every single time he takes the mound.  
    • I never expected Bradfield to develop a lot of power.  I’d call his season mildly disappointing so far (.279/.351/.375) but not a disaster.   Honesty, with one pretty strong month his numbers could be right where I would have expected.   I doubt the O’s are looking to unload Bradfield just because Honeycutt may soon be signed, but he’s certainly not an untouchable if another team wants him as part of a package in exchange for something we need this year.    
    • Well as Malike tells me all the time you are ruining my ignore button but now I can’t unsee this.  Hindsight is always 20/20 with these guys that have some kind of agenda.  This guys is to prove that Elias or “Mike” as he always addresses him as is just not that good of a GM.   To have anticipated Means would have to have a second Tommy John surgery would make Elias clairvoyant.  Much less Wells, who also who was a very successful pitcher a year ago.  To say acquiring Corbin Burnes is just a lateral move is just wrong.  Burnes would have been an upgrade to ANY pitching staff in baseball and we gave up a top talented prospect to do it.  A move they should have made and I don’t doubt he will do it again.   Bottom line is to date the team and pitching staff Elias has put together had the Orioles with the best record in the AL through 102 games even with three top end starters needing TJ surgery.  How many other pitching staff’s could endure that with the results we have had so far?  Maybe the very rich Dodgers.  It is also not fair to judge Elias on what he can accomplish with John Angelos as an owner versus what he may be able to accomplish with this new ownership.  I guarantee he has more assets at his disposal today then he did any time before opening day.  Lets let the season and the trade deadline play out.  
    • The two guys Seattle traded for Arozarena were both draft picks in last years draft. 4th rd and 6th rd picks. The 4th rd pick was an overslot $1.2 million HS bat. The 6th rd pick was a NCAA SP that actually was underslot at 230k.  Just for that perspective with the recent draft. The $1.2 million signing bonus is on par with what we gave Jackson Baumeister as a 2nd rd pick last year. 
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...