Jump to content

Who will pay Burnes $400M this offseason?


psagawa

Recommended Posts

37 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

Hold up a second.

I'm not stating that an impact hasn't resulted from the relocation.

I'm stating that Baltimore had no case for keeping the Nationals out of DC and that the market can (and does) support two teams.

The ownership of the Orioles got a heck of a bribe with MASN, which should have resulted additional monies that would have lessened the monetary impact of the Nationals.  I'm sure it did to some extent even if he network was underutilized.

 

They absolutely had a case.  It was going to decimate their attendance and market share.

Now, that said, obviously the area can have 2 teams…I’m not saying it can’t.

But it was an enormous financial hardship to the Os when it happened, which is why the MaSN deal was set up the way it was and why the Os were right to fight them in court and why the Nats should have never won.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

They absolutely had a case.  It was going to decimate their attendance and market share.

Now, that said, obviously the area can have 2 teams…I’m not saying it can’t.

But it was an enormous financial hardship to the Os when it happened, which is why the MaSN deal was set up the way it was and why the Os were right to fight them in court and why the Nats should have never won.

Why would the Nats have lost?

What precedent would have been cited?

The AFL-NFL merger?  But wait that's Football so that's a stupid comparison.

Let me guess, I should just google it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Can_of_corn said:

Why would the Nats have lost?

What precedent would have been cited?

The AFL-NFL merger?  But wait that's Football so that's a stupid comparison.

Let me guess, I should just google it?

Who cares bout precedent?  There was an agreement that should have been upheld. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

They absolutely had a case.  It was going to decimate their attendance and market share.

Now, that said, obviously the area can have 2 teams…I’m not saying it can’t.

But it was an enormous financial hardship to the Os when it happened, which is why the MaSN deal was set up the way it was and why the Os were right to fight them in court and why the Nats should have never won.

I believe there was a wink, wink to the Nats that basically said, "Don't worry we'll take care of this later."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

Who cares bout precedent?  There was an agreement that should have been upheld. 

What agreement?

Honest question.

The Orioles moved into a territory that they shared with a ML team from Washington.

Are you saying that MLB made an agreement with Baltimore after DC lost their team to never move a team back?

If they did that's the dumbest thing ever.  Why would they do that?  What did Baltimore give up for that concession?

I've never heard of this, I am waiting eagerly for this story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

What agreement?

Honest question.

The Orioles moved into a territory that they shared with a ML team from Washington.

Are you saying that MLB made an agreement with Baltimore after DC lost their team to never move a team back?

If they did that's the dumbest thing ever.  Why would they do that?  What did Baltimore give up for that concession?

I've never heard of this, I am waiting eagerly for this story.

The MASN agreement and the arrangement they had in terms of percentages 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

🤦‍♂️

 

I don’t think you are following what I’m saying.

It's hard.

 

You said "the Os were right to fight them in court and why the Nats should have never won.".

I want to know why you think that MLB (the Nats) shouldn't have won from a legal standpoint. 

 

Or are you just saying they shouldn't have won because it was unfair to the O's? 

Is that the disconnect?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

It's hard.

 

You said "the Os were right to fight them in court and why the Nats should have never won.".

I want to know why you think that MLB (the Nats) shouldn't have won from a legal standpoint. 

 

Or are you just saying they shouldn't have won because it was unfair to the O's? 

Is that the disconnect?

I’m saying the Os had an agreement with MLB and that should have held up.  Been pretty clear about that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Sports Guy said:

I’m saying the Os had an agreement with MLB and that should have held up.  Been pretty clear about that. 

What agreement?

The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Can_of_corn said:

What agreement?

The agreement you are talking about happened as a result of the move.  The MASN agreement would not have existed if Angelos had gone to court to block the move.

I’m aware.   You are arguing something im Not.

Edited by Sports Guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Can_of_corn said:

You don't think teams like the Cowboys have inherent advantages?

Also, I guess you are just ignoring my baseball example?  Because it's too old?

From a legal standpoint what grounds did the Orioles have to keep the Nats out?

MLB just gave them a fat bribe that they mishandled to expedite the process since they knew how litigious Angelos was.

 

You're also older than me so there!


The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB
 

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/

Highest $305 million vs $60 million 

https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space

Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline. 

If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time.

The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024. 
 

The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both. 


What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done. 
 

They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool, nice work there.

 

So?

Are we owed a large market?

Does DC not deserve their own team?

Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits).

I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Posts

    • It will be retired with the first big $$ free agent or extension signed under Rubenstein.
    • Cool, nice work there.   So? Are we owed a large market? Does DC not deserve their own team? Should the fans of Baltimore just become Redskins fans and not tried to get their own team when the Colts left?  (sorry to bring up football again but come on, that fits). I laid it all out a couple months ago, MLB has more teams bringing home the hunk of metal than other sports since 2000.  The competitive balance is fine.  It's harder?  Yea?  OK it's harder.
    • The Cowboys have an owner with deep pockets. I agree 100% … There is some cap manipulation that happens. At the end of the day they have a $255 million limit they are required to operate under. The Dodgers, Yankees, Red Sox, etc can decide each year how much they want to add to the luxury tax fund as opposed to not being able to fit a potential move under the cap. Here are the 2024 payrolls for the NFL and MLB   https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2024/04/03/mlb-team-payrolls-2024-highest-lowest-mets/73139425007/ Highest $305 million vs $60 million  https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cap/_/year/2024/sort/cap_maximum_space Highest $259.5 million vs $217 million these numbers will likely get tighter once they make additions before the trade deadline.  If you can’t see the difference I’m just wasting my time. The biggest driving force in MLB beyond the ability of some to spend lavishly is the tv markets. The club controls so much of their tv revenue that it’s an unfair game. The moved that created the Orioles didn’t have much of an effect on the Senators tv market which was likely nonexistent then. Plus MLB is allowing contract manipulation like Othani’s contract. Instead of $700 divided by length 10 years, Somehow he only counts as like $46 million which is laughable. Plus they are paying $85 million in luxury tax fees in 2024.    The Orioles were a large market team when the Expos moved to DC. They could afford to spend with the Yankees, Red Sox , and Blue Jays. Could the Orioles afford to pay $85 million in luxury tax fees? Could the Yankees? I know the answer to both.  What grounds ? Who cares ? The impact was astronomical …It made it very difficult to compete in the AL East without tank a thon! It split their tv market in half. Obviously MLB papered over that long enough to get an agreement done.    They turned a large market team into 2 small/mid market teams. The Orioles and Nationals payrolls combined place them only 11th in baseball. Obviously they could afford to spend more. But it’s doubtful either will ever be top 10 for more than a season  or two as they try to hang onto a window.     
    • Thanks for the detailed explanation of all of the issues.  Sounds like a mess.
    • Yeah the amenities are pretty outdated at the yard and they seem to do nothing year over year to improve them. The touchscreens have been banged on to death to the point they barely function, so you can't accurately fill out your order at the kiosks, and they don't have a way for the people behind the counter to ring you up at many of the food places. The sound is low to non-existent in certain sections of the club level, like around 218. Seems like there should be speakers that reach there but they might have been damaged by rain, etc. and they are too lazy to fix them. If you go to a game that's even slightly busy, you will wait forever to get into the bathroom, and the sink will be an absolute mess with no soap or paper towels. It's even worse on the club level where they have one sink that's right by the door. Nearby businesses don't care, either. The Hilton parking garage reeks of decay, pot and human waste. They don't turn on the air circulation fans, even if cars are waiting for an hour and a half to exit from P3, filling up the air with carbon monoxide. They only let you enter the stadium with one 20 oz bottle of water. It's so expensive to buy a drink or water in the stadium, but with all the salty food, 20 oz of water isn't enough, especially on a hot day. Vegetarian food options are poor to none, other than things like chips, fries, hot pretzels and the occasional pizza. Vida Taco is better, but at an inconvenient location for many seats. The doors on the club level are not accessible. They're anti-accessible. Big, heavy doors you have to go through to get to/from the escalators, and big, heavy doors to get to your seats, none of them automatic (or even with the option to be automatic with a button press). Makes it hard to carry food out to your seats even if not handicapped. The furniture in the lounges on the club level seem designed to allow as few people as possible to sit down. Not great when we have so many rain delays during the season. Should put more, smaller chairs in and allow more of the club level ticket holders to have a seat while waiting for thunderstorms to pass. They keep a lot of the entrance/exit gates closed except for playoff/sellout games, which means people have to slowly "mooooo" all the way down Eutaw St to get to parking. They are too cheap to staff all the gates, so they make people exit by the warehouse, even though it would be a lot more convenient for many fans to open all the gates. Taking Light Rail would be super convenient, except that if there's at least 20k fans in attendance, it's common to have to wait 90-120 minutes to be able to board a non-full train heading toward Glen Burnie. A few trains might come by, but they are already full, or fill up fast when folks walk up to the Convention Center stop to pre-empt the folks trying to board at Camden Station. None of the garages in the area are set up to require pre-payment on entry (reservation, or give them your card / digital payment at the entrance till). If they were, emptying out the garage would be very quick, as they wouldn't need to ticket anyone on the way out: if you can't get in without paying, you can always just leave without having to stop and scan your phone or put a ticket in the machine. They shut down the Sports Legends Museum at Camden Station in 2015 because the Maryland Stadium Authority was too greedy. That place was a fun distraction if you were in the area when a game wasn't about to start, like if you show up super early on Opening Day or a playoff day. Superbook's restaurant on Eutaw is a huge downgrade from Dempsey's in terms of menu and service quality. Dempsey's used to be well-staffed, you could reserve a table online, and they had all kinds of great selection for every diet. Superbook seems like just another bar serving the same swill that the rest of the park serves, with extremely minimal and low-quality food. For that matter, most of the food at the stadium is very low quality these days. A lot of things we used to love are made to a lower standard now if they are served at all. These are gripes about the stadium and the area that haven't changed my entire adult life. Going to an O's game requires one to tolerate many small inconveniences and several major inconveniences, any number of which could easily be fixed by the relevant authorities if they gave a damn about the people who pay to come see the team play. You would think a mid-market team would be able to afford to invest in the fan experience. You would think the city and partnering organizations like garages, the Stadium Authority and MTA would at least try to do their part to make the experience enjoyable and free of kinks. You would think they would put some thought into handling the "growing pains" of the fanbase due to recent renewed interest after the dark years. Instead, all we get is the same indifference and the same annoyances year in and year out. The whole area is overdue for a revamp. Not sure if $600 mil will get it done, but at least it's a start. Hopefully they can start to patch up some of the many holes in the fan experience. If you're not going to invest in Burnes, at least make it so paying customers have an easier, more enjoyable time getting to/from the stadium and having some food while we're there.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...