Jump to content

Is Ramon packing it in?


banks703

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, SteveA said:

I'm comfortable with Westburg/Mayo/Norby covering 2nd and 3rd.

How much of a dropoff would it be from the defense Urias is providing these days?

After today I could play there. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, glenn__davis said:

Absolutely not.  If Gunnars calling is that's his ball.  Urias needs to get out of the way there. 

Yep.  The SS is like the CF.  If he calls it, you clear out.  Not sure baseball was one of OOO’s sports.    

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, OriolesUpAndDowns said:

Who is the back up SS with Mateo out?

 

Urias or Westburg?

Therein lies the problem.  Urias hasn’t played a total of 70 games at the position (and that doesn’t include total innings) and hasn’t played there at all since 2022.  I can’t imagine Westburg being much better there.  

Either Urias has to play at 3B every day to get his reps in, or they need to search outside the organization for a backup SS who can also play at other positions.  Mateo’s injury has really hurt the bench dynamic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's hilarious that people want to get rid of our utility IF.  Our Utility IF has a WRC+ of 95.  I guess people think it should be 120 and he should have made the All Star Team.  Won a Gold Glove 2 years ago.  Again this is a back up player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, OriolesMagic83 said:

It's hilarious that people want to get rid of our utility IF.  Our Utility IF has a WRC+ of 95.  I guess people think it should be 120 and he should have made the All Star Team.  Won a Gold Glove 2 years ago.  Again this is a back up player.

Problem is, we have two of them. One of Mateo/Urias should go. The Mateo injury complicates things, so I think you have to hold onto Urias until then, but when Mateo is back you dont need to carry both of them, and you didnt have to carry both of them in April either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, terpoh said:

Problem is, we have two of them. One of Mateo/Urias should go. The Mateo injury complicates things, so I think you have to hold onto Urias until then, but when Mateo is back you dont need to carry both of them, and you didnt have to carry both of them in April either.

Is Mateo coming back this year?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, eddie83 said:

Is Mateo coming back this year?

I dont think theyve indicated anything either way. But point being I dont see them moving off Urias with Mateo out, regardless of how long that is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Posts

    • The fumble was on Rosengarten.  He let Chris Jones to the outside when Faalele was supposed to be helping him to the inside.  Really awful play by Rosengarten.
    • Did you think he was hurting the team at shortstop in the first half?
    • I was trying to figure out who Jackson looks like then it hit me - the vkeyboardist for Nena  
    • Except Hyde has done EXACTLY just that - he plays waiver wire nobodies like Rivera and Maton over Coby Mayo. And a trash trade acquisition in Jimenez (who should be on waivers) over Mayo at the DH spot as well. And Hyde played a former waiver wire pickup in O'Hearn over Kjerstad. As if O'Hearn is some sort of established star.  O'Hearn has a .658 OPS over the past 30 days, and a .729 OPS in the 2nd half this season after a .756 in the 2nd half in 2023 - so he's had two straight seasons of significant 2nd half declines. O'Hearn doesn't deserve to be treated as some sort of established commodity, but Hyde does so to the team's detriment. Not playing and developing a top 10 hitting prospect in all of baseball in Mayo is irresponsible and egregiously terrible roster management by Elias and Hyde. Especially considering awful players like Rivera and Jimenez are getting playing time over him.  
    • Again, it couldn’t have been said better.   Gunnar is in his second year and will more than likely get better at everything he does as a baseball player.  Which is something to look forward to.  
    • One good Bud Norris year out of Rogers would be nice.  Two would be amazing.
    • Except he really isn't hurting the team at SS.  Again, he's an 8+ WAR player this year.  I don't know why anyone would want to argue for moving him off a position where he's performing at an MVP level.  This season is already as valuable as Ripken's '83 MVP season and more valuable than any other season Ripken had except 1984 and his monster 1991 campaign. I saw Cal play at shortstop, too.  And I think when we all think of Cal at shortstop, we think of the refined version....the guy that made 3 errors in a season (and somehow lost the Gold Glove to Ozzie f'ing Guillen) and the guy that had a whole chapter dedicated to him in George Will's "Men at Work." You neglected to respond to the idea that Gunnar can get better at the position.  There's a lot to like with him defensively already, but he's not a fully finished product and I don't think anyone here is arguing that he is.  I suspect that if you took Cal in his second season and matched that up with Gunnar, you'd see some similarities.  I also suspect that Gunnar isn't the defender that he'll be in 5 or 6 years from now, just like Ripken wasn't the best defender at SS in his early seasons. Gunnar is a 5 tool player.  There's nothing that he can't do on a baseball field and I'm sure if you put him in a "traditional power position" like a corner outfield spot, he'd be just fine. But I find it funny that you want to be called old fashioned, yet here we are discussing Cal Ripken, the guy that broke the mold for what a shortstop can be and turned it into a power position.  Ripken was ultimate anti-traditionalist of the position and responsible for the slew of power hitting shortstops that came in after him.  And quite frankly, I don't know why we're talking about power when we're debating defense.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...