Jump to content

MLB nonexistant clips on youtube. What gives, ya'll?


Moose Milligan

Recommended Posts

I'm on another board arguing about the athletic merits of baseball players and I wanted to dig and find some video clips of certain plays/players...and to my dismay, there aren't many (if any).

I had to dig hard to find a montage of Ozzie Smith. Rey Ordonez plays? Fugghetaboutit. Bo Jackson's 300+ foot strike to nail Reynolds? Can't be found.

Plenty of football and basketball highlights though.

I mean, I suppose I understand why MLB yanks baseball clips down, but IMO, it's kind of stupid not to have as many clips out there as they can. Why can't someone who wasn't around for Ozzie's prime appreciate his defensive wizardry easily? Why can't I watch Bo's throw whenever I want?

It's publicity for your sport. It's not a bad thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interestingly, I took a Wharton business of sports class with a professor who knows the guy at MLB who is in charge of all of this (who is a Wharton grad himself, IIRC). Anyway, apparently the MLB guy has a very strict philosophy about protecting rights and not allowing anything free to be disseminated on the internet. In the same vein, I believe MLB sued Slingbox (my professor said the higher-ups at MLB and Slingbox genuinely loathe each other), whereas the other leagues weren't as upset.

My professor said he thought it was foolish for MLB not to embrace technology, whereas he especially commended NHL and nhl.com for doing a much better job. His theory was that if you are stubborn like MLB is being, people are still going to find ways to get it out there illegally, and embracing technology allows for essentially free viral marketing which disseminates interest in your product.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interestingly, I took a Wharton business of sports class with a professor who knows the guy at MLB who is in charge of all of this (who is a Wharton grad himself, IIRC). Anyway, apparently the MLB guy has a very strict philosophy about protecting rights and not allowing anything free to be disseminated on the internet. In the same vein, I believe MLB sued Slingbox (my professor said the higher-ups at MLB and Slingbox genuinely loathe each other), whereas the other leagues weren't as upset.

My professor said he thought it was foolish for MLB not to embrace technology, whereas he especially commended NHL and nhl.com for doing a much better job. His theory was that if you are stubborn like MLB is being, people are still going to find ways to get it out there illegally, and embracing technology allows for essentially free viral marketing which disseminates interest in your product.

Bingo. Exactly what I was looking for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NHL has been amazing with it. They even have an account they control, but what is great is they let other people post videos no problem. The best is any fight you want to see is up at youtube.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, there are countless times when I've tried to pull up someone's "So-and-so's greatest WebGems mix" video only to find that there really aren't any... like at all. There are plenty of them out there for basketball rookies and football scrubs but we can't even view a simple highlight reel of Cal's greatest plays on the internet. Disgraceful, MLB is trying to make our National Pastime a thing of the past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • Starting point has changed.  Given the fact he has approx 1/7th of his season in the books at 1.139, to OPS just .780 for the season, he'd have to drop off to under .730 the rest of the way.  That sort of drop off wouldn't be acceptable to me. I'd like him to OPS .800 the rest of the way for roughly .850 for the season.  The more they use him in a platoon role, the better I think that number might be.
    • Can I ask how you timed it vs the DVR?  Did you use a stopwatch or count click with pause/FF, or something else?
    • I can’t fathom why anyone would want a Tanner Scott return. In 10 innings, he is 0-4 with a 1.78 whip. He was maddening before, and now he’s older. But I wonder if the Red Sox would part with Justin Slaten? He’s been pretty outstanding. Yeah, only 8 innings, but we hired Yohan Ramirez, and he’s been a catastrophe in 10. Yes, I know he’s a rule 5, and the Bosox are in the East. And their pitching is pretty thin, too. But they know they aren’t going anywhere in this division, and they might think getting a good return for a Free Rule 5 guy might be worthwhile.
    • This draft unfolded weirdly.  First with the *nix guys getting taken early and then how no defensive players got taken all draft, and then a bunch of teams reaching for OTs.  I'm pretty happy with how the draft unfolded because I think we got a player that I expected to be gone by the teens or early 20s.  I don't know what we're doing with our OL but hopefully we can maybe trade up from 62 to pick someone up.
    • I have it on dvr and I timed it four times. I got 10.75, 10.80, 10.74, and 10.78.
    • This is exactly what EDC said tonight     
    • My guess is more of a safety profile than they preferred. They clearly wanted Wiggins. They ran that pick up fast. And then when you listen to the press conference, the love for the player was obvious.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...