Jump to content

One down, one to go


incubus

Recommended Posts

I didn't see it. You mean the great Papelbon blew a save? Say it ain't so Jonathan. :clap3:

There are very few players for whom I have animosity, but he's one of them. I wish Vlad's hit had gone right through his O-lips and down his throat.

This brings up an interesting scenario. There was a rumor when they acquired Wagner that if he did well they would possibly look to (1) extend him, and then (2) move Papelbon via trade.

There's rumors about lots of stuff. I can't believe Theo would get rid of a guy like Papelbon so he can rely on a closer who's gonna be almost 40...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't see it. You mean the great Papelbon blew a save? Say it ain't so Jonathan. :clap3:

This brings up an interesting scenario. There was a rumor when they acquired Wagner that if he did well they would possibly look to (1) extend him, and then (2) move Papelbon via trade.

Boston future's closer, if not Papelbon, is Bard, IMO. I would imagine that Wagner would stay in the set-up role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think outside the box for a minute.

The question with Papelbon has always been how long will his arm last before it falls apart?

He has shown a few signs the last couple of seasons that his talent/arm may be beginning to erode, if ever so slightly. His BB-Rate was triple this year to what it was last year, for instance. His LD% went up for the second straight season, for instance. His FB% went from 31% last year to 52% this year, for instance. The effectiveness of his fastball declined for the second straight season, for instance. Opposing batters chased fewer pitches outside of the strike zone than they ever have before, for instance. The contact rate on his pitches went up for the second straight season, for instance.

He's approaching his last two years of arbitration, I believe, which means that he's about to become very expensive.

The team that acquires him will have his services for at least two years, which means that his trade value will likely never be higher than it will be this offseason.

Maybe there's an NL team that feels it is a closer away from contending next season that just so happens to have in its minor league system what the Red Sox feel they could use - say good young pitching or maybe a shortstop of the future (just to throw a position out there).

So they look at all those things and trade Papelbon to make up for the loss of talent in the Martinez and whoever trades in July and August. After doing that they sign Wagner as the bridge to Bard who would then either take over as closer in 2011 or 2012.

I could definitely see them moving Papelbon this offseason.

Very nicely done. You've changed how I look at it.

I like it when somebody changes my mind ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think outside the box for a minute.

The question with Papelbon has always been how long will his arm last before it falls apart?

He has shown a few signs the last couple of seasons that his talent/arm may be beginning to erode, if ever so slightly. His BB-Rate was triple this year to what it was last year, for instance. His LD% went up for the second straight season, for instance. His FB% went from 31% last year to 52% this year, for instance. The effectiveness of his fastball declined for the second straight season, for instance. Opposing batters chased fewer pitches outside of the strike zone than they ever have before, for instance. The contact rate on his pitches went up for the second straight season, for instance.

He's approaching his last two years of arbitration, I believe, which means that he's about to become very expensive.

The team that acquires him will have his services for at least two years, which means that his trade value will likely never be higher than it will be this offseason.

Maybe there's an NL team that feels it is a closer away from contending next season that just so happens to have in its minor league system what the Red Sox feel they could use - say good young pitching or maybe a shortstop of the future (just to throw a position out there).

So they look at all those things and trade Papelbon to make up for the loss of talent in the Martinez and whoever trades in July and August. After doing that they sign Wagner as the bridge to Bard who would then either take over as closer in 2011 or 2012.

I could definitely see them moving Papelbon this offseason.

Throw in the fact that Epstein isn't afraid to deal a fan favorite and you have the makings of an interesting, and likely eventful, offseason in Beantown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Posts

    • the question isn’t about being able to make the offers, it’s about being awarded compensatory picks for more than one.
    • I don’t consider a 4 o’clock game a night game. He also caught Wednesday night and Thursday day this week. Moral of the story is McCann will start 4 games in 7 days because he is Burnes preferred catcher.
    • It is absolutely possible. In 2022, the Mets gave a QO to Bassitt, Nikki, and DeGrom. The Red Sox gave a QO to Boegarts and Eovaldi. The Yankees gave a QO to Judge and Rizzo. The Dodgers gave a QO to Turner and Anderson. I know that it seems to be a foregone conclusion that Santander will not be on the team after this season, and while I generally agree that it is more probable than not that he will not be re-signed, I do think there is a non-zero chance that he will be retained. I think he is the most likely of Mullins, Hays, and himself to be retained, even if it is a small chance. The team has told us how they feel about his bat because he plays essentially everyday, and I have heard Kostka say that they value his clubhouse presence.
    • Santander won’t get a QO, and if he did, he would accept. His defense is declining and we have too many capable youngsters who should replace him effectively. But to your question, I don’t know if there’s a limit, but I doubt it.
    • O's will probably have to wait till July for a trade because there are so many more buyers than sellers.  I think teams like the Blue Jays, Rays Tigers and Mets are likely to be sellers but they are still in the race although not very good teams as constituted. 
    • No Scott. He’s way too undependable. We need someone who WON’T enter a game and walk folks like he’s promoting a healthy lifestyle. He’s been a lot bette4 this season, but he’s too undependable, and we already have too many of those. No Flaherty either. That’s like taking your GF back after she cheated on you.
    • The team's continued success has really put Elias on the spot IMO and I don't see a Flaherty type as an option anymore.  My money is on a sensible trade that comes at a price high enough that most of us here, including myself, won't like, but a premium comes with having bad luck and that's where the O's are at the moment.
  • Popular Contributors

×
×
  • Create New...